Integrated Effects of Genetic Resistance and Prothioconazole + Tebuconazole Application Timing on Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat.


Journal

Plant disease
ISSN: 0191-2917
Titre abrégé: Plant Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9882809

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 30 11 2018
medline: 11 7 2019
entrez: 29 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Integrated Fusarium head blight (FHB) management programs consisting of different combinations of cultivar resistance class and an application of the fungicide prothioconazole + tebuconazole at or after 50% early anthesis were evaluated for efficacy against FHB incidence (INC; percentage of diseased spikes), index (IND; percentage of diseased spikelets per spike), Fusarium damaged kernel (FDK), deoxynivalenol (DON) toxin contamination, grain yield, and test weight (TW) in inoculated field trials conducted in 11 U.S. states in 2014 and 2015. Mean log response ratios and corresponding percent control values for INC, IND, FDK, and DON, and mean differences in yield and TW relative to a nontreated, inoculated susceptible check (S_CK), were estimated through network meta-analyses as measures of efficacy. Results from the analyses were then used to estimate the economic benefit of each management program for a range of grain prices and fungicide applications costs. Management programs consisting of a moderately resistant (MR) cultivar treated with the fungicide were the most efficacious, reducing INC by 60 to 69%, IND by 71 to 76%, FDK by 66 to 72%, and DON by 60 to 64% relative to S_CK, compared with 56 to 62% for INC, 68 to 72% for IND, 66 to 68% for FDK, and 58 to 61% for DON for programs with a moderately susceptible (MS) cultivar. The least efficacious programs were those with a fungicide application to a susceptible (S) cultivar, with less than a 45% reduction of INC, IND, FDK, or DON. All programs were more efficacious under conditions favorable for FHB compared with less favorable conditions, with applications made at 50% early anthesis being of comparable efficacy to those made 2 to 7 days later. Programs with an MS cultivar resulted in the highest mean yield increases relative to S_CK (541 to 753 kg/ha), followed by programs with an S cultivar (386 to 498 kg/ha) and programs with an MR cultivar (250 to 337 kg/ha). Integrated management programs with an MS or MR cultivar treated with the fungicide at or after 50% early anthesis were the most likely to result in a 50 or 75% control of IND, FDK, or DON in a future trial. At a fixed fungicide application cost, these programs were $4 to $319/MT more economically beneficial than corresponding fungicide-only programs, depending on the cultivar and grain price. These findings demonstrate the benefits of combining genetic resistance with a prothioconazole + tebuconazole treatment to manage FHB, even if that treatment is applied a few days after 50% early anthesis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30484755
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-18-0565-RE
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fungicides, Industrial 0
Triazoles 0
prothioconazole 27B9FV58IY
tebuconazole 401ATW8TRW

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

223-237

Auteurs

P A Paul (PA)

Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691.

J D Salgado (JD)

Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691.

G Bergstrom (G)

Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

C A Bradley (CA)

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky Research and Education Center, Princeton, KY 42445.

E Byamukama (E)

South Dakota State University, Department of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Sciences, Brookings, SD 57007.

A M Byrne (AM)

Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

V Chapara (V)

North Dakota State University, Langdon Research Extension Center, Langdon, ND 58249.

J A Cummings (JA)

Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

M I Chilvers (MI)

Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

R Dill-Macky (R)

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

A Friskop (A)

North Dakota State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Fargo, ND 58102.

N Kleczewski (N)

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, The University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19719.

L V Madden (LV)

Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691.

M Nagelkirk (M)

Michigan State University Extension, Sandusky, MI 48471.

J Stevens (J)

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Plant Pathology, NE 68538.

M Smith (M)

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, Northwest Research and Outreach Center, Crookston, MN 56716.

S N Wegulo (SN)

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Plant Pathology, NE 68538.

K Wise (K)

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky Research and Education Center, Princeton, KY 42445.

D Yabwalo (D)

South Dakota State University, Department of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, Brookings, SD 57007.

Articles similaires

Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Capsicum Disease Resistance Plant Diseases Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Ralstonia solanacearum
Genome, Bacterial Virulence Phylogeny Genomics Plant Diseases
Triticum Transcription Factors Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins Salt Stress

Classifications MeSH