Prognostic Value of Knowledge of Cancer and Used Unconventional Therapy Methods on Quality of Life in Advanced, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Clinical Practice.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ psychology
Eating
Female
Humans
Hypothermia, Induced
/ methods
Life Style
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Medication Knowledge
/ statistics & numerical data
Prognosis
Quality of Life
Survival Rate
Chemotherapy
Colorectal cancer
Knowledge of cancer
Quality of life
Treatment outcomes
Journal
Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education
ISSN: 1543-0154
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
14
12
2018
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
8
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy in the world and the second cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite the search for new therapeutic agents, there are still many doubts concerning the quality of life (QOL) improvement in palliative patients. In this study, we assessed the impact of oncology knowledge on QOL and the relationship between QOL and various environmental factors and unconventional treatment methods in patients with CRC treated with chemotherapy and targeted therapy. The results of first-line palliative chemotherapy in 330 patients with colorectal cancer treated between January 2010 and December 2016 in two centers were analyzed. The average age of patients was 66 ± 11.7 years. Median survival time was 25 months. In multivariate analysis, the performance status and response to treatment had a significant effect on survival time. A trend towards shorter survival was also observed in patients receiving 5-FU monotherapy, in elderly patients and in patients with less oncology knowledge. A relationship between general quality of life and performance status (PS 0 vs. PS > 0), response to treatment and oncology knowledge was found. Patients with limited oncology knowledge more often used unconventional therapy methods in parallel with the treatment. In patients over 70 years of age and in patients with worse overall condition, 5-FU monotherapy was more commonly used (p < 0.01). The level of oncology knowledge of the treated patients observed in everyday clinical practice may be related to some parameters of treatment effectiveness assessment, such as QOL and may be related to the use of unconventional treatment methods. Those, in turn may have an impact on the QOL of the treated patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30523599
doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1454-1
pii: 10.1007/s13187-018-1454-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
151-158Références
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(16):2938-47
pubmed: 10944126
Lancet. 2000 Mar 25;355(9209):1041-7
pubmed: 10744089
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):229-37
pubmed: 14657227
Lancet. 1998 Oct 31;352(9138):1413-8
pubmed: 9807987
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1403-9
pubmed: 8560308
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Sep;30(3):432-8
pubmed: 25270555
N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 28;343(13):905-14
pubmed: 11006366
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jan;15(1):23-34
pubmed: 24314615
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3721-8
pubmed: 12963704
Cancer Treat Rev. 2012 Aug;38(5):554-8
pubmed: 21807465
Ann Oncol. 2009 Feb;20(2):251-7
pubmed: 18718892
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):883-91
pubmed: 23759360
Cancer Treat Rev. 2012 Oct;38(6):807-14
pubmed: 22445316
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Apr;18(4):417-21
pubmed: 19554353