Analysis of the French national evaluation of radiology residents.
Clinical Competence
/ legislation & jurisprudence
France
Health Policy
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Internship and Residency
Licensure, Medical
/ legislation & jurisprudence
National Health Programs
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Radiology
/ education
Retrospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Docimology
Learning
Pedagogy
Radiology
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional imaging
ISSN: 2211-5684
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Imaging
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101568499
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
01
11
2018
accepted:
18
11
2018
pubmed:
12
12
2018
medline:
31
3
2020
entrez:
12
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In France, a national evaluation is given annually to radiology residents. The aim of this study was to perform both a docimological analysis of the quality of the questionnaire and a statistical analysis of the results. This retrospective study, which included French radiology residents from Year 1 to Year 5 of residency, was performed from 2015 to 2017 across 25 medical universities in France. Both qualitative and quantitative docimological analyses were performed as assessed by the Cronbach alpha coefficient, the difficulty of question (PDI), and the coefficient of discrimination (Rir). Results to the questionnaire were compared between years of residency. The results of the analysis confirmed the quality of the questionnaire (Cronbach alpha coefficient=0.71, mean [PDI=0.40]) though the majority of questions could be answered by memory rather than cognitive ability. The mean Rir was 0.02, indicating that students could not be certified using only the questionnaire. The results measuring resident level of knowledge were moderate, with mean results ranging from 9.2/20 at the first year to 11.3/20 at the fifth year of residency (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in results obtained between the third, fourth, and fifth year of residency but results were significantly different among university hospitals. Even if close interactions exist between learning and pedagogic environment, our results suggest that it may be useful to further develop an evaluation process in relation with pedagogic instructions in order to provide more optimal training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30527527
pii: S2211-5684(18)30294-8
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.11.006
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
185-193Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Société française de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.