Decrease in interpretation time for both novice and experienced readers using a concurrent computer-aided detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Breast cancer
Computer-assisted diagnosis
Digital breast tomosynthesis
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
21
09
2018
accepted:
13
11
2018
pubmed:
14
12
2018
medline:
6
6
2019
entrez:
15
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the diagnostic performance and interpretation time of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for both novice and experienced readers with and without using a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for concurrent read. CAD system was developed for concurrent read in DBT interpretation. In this observer performance study, we used an enriched sample of 100 DBT cases including 70 with and 30 without breast cancers. Image interpretation was performed by four radiologists with different experience levels (two experienced and two novice). Each reader completed two reading sessions (at a minimum 2-month interval), once with and once without CAD. Three different rating scales were used to record each reader's interpretation. Reader performance with and without CAD was reported and compared for each radiologist. Reading time for each case was also recorded. Average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for BI-RADS scale on using CAD were 0.778 and 0.776 without using CAD, demonstrating no statistically significant differences. Results were consistent when the probability of malignancy and percentage probability of malignancy scales were used. Reading times per case were 72.07 s and 62.03 s (SD, 37.54 s vs 34.38 s) without and with CAD, respectively. The average difference in reading time on using CAD was a statistically significant decrease of 10.04 ± 1.85 s, providing 14% decrease in time. The time-reducing effect was consistently observed in both novice and experienced readers. DBT combined with CAD reduced interpretation time without diagnostic performance loss to novice and experienced readers. • The use of a concurrent DBT-CAD system shortened interpretation time. • The shortened interpretation time with DBT-CAD did not come at a cost to diagnostic performance to novice or experienced readers. • The concurrent DBT-CAD system improved the efficiency of DBT interpretation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30547203
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5886-0
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5886-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2518-2525Subventions
Organisme : R&D Convergence Program of the National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) of the Republic of Korea
ID : CAP-13-3-KERI
Références
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jan;26(1):184-90
pubmed: 25929946
Radiology. 2017 May;283(2):371-380
pubmed: 28287917
Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2061-71
pubmed: 23553585
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20150743
pubmed: 27072391
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Oct 13;106(11):
pubmed: 25313245
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):685-694
pubmed: 29064756
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Sep;189(3):616-23
pubmed: 17715109
Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):104-13
pubmed: 23169790
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Dec;97:83-89
pubmed: 29153373
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):663-84
pubmed: 26599926
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 18;356(3):227-36
pubmed: 17229950
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):586-91
pubmed: 19620460
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):256-266
pubmed: 27786548
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9
pubmed: 23623721
Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):47-56
pubmed: 23297332
Breast Cancer. 2016 Nov;23(6):886-892
pubmed: 26534858
JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):33-8
pubmed: 8667536
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75
pubmed: 12355001
Cancer. 2001 May 1;91(9):1724-31
pubmed: 11335897
Radiology. 2014 Jan;270(1):49-56
pubmed: 24354377
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 May;19(5):1219-28
pubmed: 20406961
Radiology. 2004 Jan;230(1):29-41
pubmed: 14617762
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1778-86
pubmed: 23117178