Transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation utilizing a novel vascular closure device with resorbable collagen material: a feasibility study.
Absorbable Implants
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiography
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ diagnosis
Axillary Artery
Collagen
Equipment Design
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Male
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
/ instrumentation
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Closure Devices
Transaxillary
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Vascular closure device
Journal
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
ISSN: 1861-0692
Titre abrégé: Clin Res Cardiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101264123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
30
10
2018
accepted:
13
12
2018
pubmed:
19
12
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
19
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We herein aimed to evaluate technical feasibility of transaxillary (Tax) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) utilizing a novel vascular closure device with a resorbable collagen plug and absence of suture material. Between 05/2018 and 8/2018, eight patients (76.0 ± 5.9 years, 62.5% male, logEuroSCORE I 23.6 ± 4.7) received Tax-TAVI using the MANTA™ vascular closure device. Implanted transcatheter heart valves consisted of Edwards Sapien 3, NVT Allegra, Medtronic CoreValve EvolutR and SJM Portico. Puncture location depth was variable (3.5-7.5 cm). The left subclavian artery was used in five cases, the right subclavian artery in three cases. Low-pressure balloon-angioplasty for vessel closure was performed in 5/8 patients. VARC-2 defined device success was met in all patients. Major access site complication occurred in one patient with aneurysma spurium of the subclavian artery and consecutive stent implantation on postoperative day 5. The MANTA™ device is applicable in Tax-TAVI, with potential particular advantages regarding easiness of use and marked access for subsequent interventions in case of vascular complications. Before conclusions regarding clinical efficacy and safety can be made, the device has to be evaluated in larger patient cohorts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30560381
doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1407-z
pii: 10.1007/s00392-018-1407-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Collagen
9007-34-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
779-786Références
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 May;5(5):477-486
pubmed: 22625184
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):6-23
pubmed: 23084102
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec 31;8(1):null
pubmed: 25552563
Circulation. 2015 Jun 2;131(22):1989-2000
pubmed: 25832034
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;117(2):245-51
pubmed: 26639038
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jul;105(7):585-91
pubmed: 26680213
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 14;69(10):1215-1230
pubmed: 27956264
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;232:247-254
pubmed: 28118931
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;119(7):1094-1099
pubmed: 28153349
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1167-1174
pubmed: 28296065
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 11;70(2):252-289
pubmed: 28315732
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 27;10(6):613-619
pubmed: 28335899
EuroIntervention. 2017 Oct 20;13(8):928-934
pubmed: 28606889
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791
pubmed: 28886619
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):998-1001
pubmed: 29068128
Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(1):202-208
pubmed: 29131296
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):935-944
pubmed: 29314570
J Cardiol. 2018 Jun;71(6):525-533
pubmed: 29499894
J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;72(5):369-376
pubmed: 29804907
EuroIntervention. 2019 May 20;15(1):76-77
pubmed: 30295294