Comparison of hospitalised trends, treatment cost and health outcomes of fall-related hip fracture for people aged ≥ 65 years living in residential aged care and the community.
Accidental Falls
/ economics
Activities of Daily Living
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Comorbidity
Female
Health Care Costs
/ statistics & numerical data
Hip Fractures
/ economics
Homes for the Aged
Hospitalization
/ economics
Humans
Independent Living
Male
Medical Record Linkage
New South Wales
/ epidemiology
Osteoporotic Fractures
/ economics
Retrospective Studies
Community
Hip fracture
Hospitalisation
Residential aged care
Journal
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
ISSN: 1433-2965
Titre abrégé: Osteoporos Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9100105
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
13
08
2018
accepted:
04
12
2018
pubmed:
21
12
2018
medline:
4
9
2019
entrez:
21
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study compared hip fracture rates and health outcomes of older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) to the community. The RACF resident age-standardised hospitalisation rate was five times higher than the community rate and declining. RACF residents experience overall worse health outcomes and survival post-hip fracture. To compare hospitalisation trends, characteristics and health outcomes following a fall-related hip fracture of older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) to older people living in the community. A retrospective analysis of fall-related hip fracture hospitalisations of people aged ≥ 65 years during 1 July 2008 and 30 June 2013 in New South Wales (NSW), Australia's largest populated state. Linked hospitalisation, RACF and Aged Care Assessment Appraisal data collections were examined. Negative binomial regression examined the significance of hospitalisation temporal trends. There were 28,897 hip fracture hospitalisations. One-third were of older people living in RACFs. The hospitalisation rate was 2180 per 100,000 (95%CI: 2097.0-2263.7) for RACF residents and 390 per 100,000 (95%CI 384.8-395.8) for older people living in the community. The hospitalisation rate for RACF residents was estimated to decline by 2.9% annually (95%CI: - 4.3 to - 1.5). Hospital treatment cost for hip fractures was AUD$958.5 million. Compared to older people living in the community, a higher proportion of RACF residents were aged ≥ 90 years (36.1% vs 17.2%), were female (75.3% vs 71.8%), had > 1 Charlson comorbidity (37.6% vs 35.6%) and 58.2% had dementia (vs 14.4%). RACF residents had fewer in-hospital rehabilitation episodes (18.7% vs 60.9%) and a higher proportion of unplanned readmissions (10.6% vs 9.1%) and in-hospital mortality (5.9% vs 3.3%) compared to older people living in the community. RACF residents are a vulnerable cohort of older people who experience worse health outcomes and survival post-hip fracture than older people living in the community. Whether access to individualised hip fracture rehabilitation for RACF residents could improve their health outcomes should be examined.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30569228
doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4800-6
pii: 10.1007/s00198-018-4800-6
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
311-321Subventions
Organisme : Dementia Collaborative Research Centres, Australia
ID : n/a
Organisme : NSW Ministry of Health
ID : n/a
Références
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Feb;38(1):13-8
pubmed: 24494939
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):67
pubmed: 28726112
Bone. 2009 Aug;45(2):246-53
pubmed: 19409518
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Feb;32(2):153-158
pubmed: 27605004
Osteoporos Int. 2009 Oct;20(10):1633-50
pubmed: 19421703
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Sep 1;17(9):852-9
pubmed: 27349626
Osteoporos Int. 2011 May;22(5):1277-88
pubmed: 21461721
Ageing Res Rev. 2011 Sep;10(4):430-9
pubmed: 21402176
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Sep 02;16:158
pubmed: 27590604
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Nov-Dec;67:61-7
pubmed: 27434743
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Oct;62(10):1127-33
pubmed: 17921426
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):917-20
pubmed: 21553328
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):1011-9
pubmed: 17063133
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1273-80
pubmed: 25055155
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jul;19(7):592-600.e7
pubmed: 29941156
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Apr 03;7:208
pubmed: 24708799
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676-82
pubmed: 21330339
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Aug;53(8):1386-91
pubmed: 16078966
J Qual Clin Pract. 2000 Dec;20(4):167-70
pubmed: 11207957
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Nov;38(23):2286-95
pubmed: 26765956
J Hosp Med. 2010 Feb;5(2):69-75
pubmed: 20104623
BMJ. 2006 Jul 1;333(7557):27-30
pubmed: 16809710
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:17
pubmed: 25609030
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Mar;26(3):1219-24
pubmed: 25377498
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jul;19(7):607-612
pubmed: 29752159
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Sep;71(9):1230-4
pubmed: 26980299
Public Health. 2002 Sep;116(5):257-62
pubmed: 12209400
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jan;24(1):99-109
pubmed: 22349962
Osteoporos Int. 2013 May;24(5):1599-603
pubmed: 23108781
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Dec;19(12):1741-7
pubmed: 18484149