Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Assessment of JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2 Copy Number Alterations at 9p24.1 in Breast Cancer: Potential Implications for Clinical Management.
B7-H1 Antigen
/ genetics
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
DNA Copy Number Variations
/ genetics
Female
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ methods
Humans
Janus Kinase 2
/ genetics
Microsatellite Instability
Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 Protein
/ genetics
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ genetics
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
/ genetics
Journal
The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD
ISSN: 1943-7811
Titre abrégé: J Mol Diagn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100893612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
05
06
2018
revised:
28
08
2018
accepted:
24
10
2018
pubmed:
24
12
2018
medline:
23
6
2020
entrez:
22
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Genomic amplification at 9p24.1, including the loci for JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2, has recently been described as a mechanism of resistance in postchemotherapy, triple-negative breast cancer. This genomic signature holds significant promise as a prognostic biomarker and has implications for targeted therapy with JAK2 inhibitors, as well as with immunotherapy. To guide future screening strategies, the frequency of these alterations was determined. A total of 5399 cases were included in the study. This encompassed 2890 institutional cases tested by the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets assay and 2509 cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The combined incidence of 9p24.1 amplifications in both the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets and TCGA cohorts was 1.0% (56/5399 cases) and showed a >10-fold higher incidence in triple-negative breast cancer (triple-negative: 5.1%; non-triple-negative: 0.5%). Tumor mutation burden and stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, parameters used to assess response to immunotherapy, were not significantly higher for these cases. The significance of genomic losses at 9p24.1 is unclear, and further studies are needed. Herein, we studied the spectrum of copy number alterations in breast cancer cases within our institutional clinical sequencing cohort and those profiled by TCGA to determine the frequency of genomic alterations that may predict response or resistance to JAK2 inhibitors and/or immunotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30576871
pii: S1525-1578(18)30244-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.10.006
pmc: PMC6432425
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
CD274 protein, human
0
PDCD1LG2 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 Protein
0
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
JAK2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.2
Janus Kinase 2
EC 2.7.10.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
307-317Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):259-71
pubmed: 25214542
Mod Pathol. 2018 Feb;31(2):214-234
pubmed: 29192647
Leukemia. 2016 Aug;30(8):1701-7
pubmed: 27211272
Nat Commun. 2016 May 10;7:11479
pubmed: 27161491
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Jun;134(6):907-22
pubmed: 20524868
Oncotarget. 2015 Sep 22;6(28):26483-93
pubmed: 26317899
Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jan 23;11(476):
pubmed: 30674656
Drug Discov Today. 2015 Dec;20(12):1422-8
pubmed: 26320725
Nat Rev Immunol. 2003 Nov;3(11):900-11
pubmed: 14668806
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Mar 1;23(5):1220-1226
pubmed: 27620277
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Mar 1;9(379):
pubmed: 28251903
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;23(11):2640-2646
pubmed: 28572258
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):1283-94
pubmed: 27451390
Fam Cancer. 2017 Oct;16(4):525-529
pubmed: 28405781
Blood Adv. 2017 Dec 12;1(26):2643-2654
pubmed: 29296917
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 20;34(21):2460-7
pubmed: 27138582
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3997-4013
pubmed: 24101045
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;4(9):1237-1244
pubmed: 29902298
Nat Med. 2017 Jun;23(6):703-713
pubmed: 28481359
Breast Cancer. 2017 Jan;24(1):3-15
pubmed: 27138387
Mod Pathol. 2017 Nov;30(11):1516-1526
pubmed: 28752839
Blood. 2010 Oct 28;116(17):3268-77
pubmed: 20628145
Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Sep;7(9):673-83
pubmed: 17721432
Nature. 2014 Sep 11;513(7517):202-9
pubmed: 25079317
Blood. 2017 Jun 8;129(23):3071-3073
pubmed: 28356247
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;158(1):1-9
pubmed: 27260189
Cancer Discov. 2017 Feb;7(2):188-201
pubmed: 27903500
J Mol Diagn. 2017 Mar;19(2):244-254
pubmed: 28027945
Oncogene. 2016 Feb 25;35(8):939-51
pubmed: 25982279
Cancer Discov. 2014 Feb;4(2):232-45
pubmed: 24356096
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Mar;60(3):505-14
pubmed: 9042909
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Nov;16(11):2598-2608
pubmed: 28835386
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 1;375(9):819-29
pubmed: 27433843
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 15;7(11):12024-34
pubmed: 26918453
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):311-9
pubmed: 25482239
Nature. 2012 Apr 18;486(7403):346-52
pubmed: 22522925
J Mol Diagn. 2015 May;17(3):251-64
pubmed: 25801821