How do midwives facilitate women to give birth during physiological second stage of labour? A protocol for a systematic review.
Intrapartum care
Midwifery
Physiological birth
Second stage of labour
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jan 2019
03 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
18
08
2018
accepted:
09
12
2018
entrez:
5
1
2019
pubmed:
5
1
2019
medline:
3
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Midwives' practices during the second stage of labour vary nationally and internationally. We aim to retrieve evidence that supports high-quality intrapartum care by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, EMBASE.com , Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Maternity and Infant Care Database (through MIDIRS), and The Cochrane Library will be searched to identify studies that meet the inclusion criteria. No language or publication date constraints will be applied. Articles that pass the two-stage screening process will then be assessed for risk of bias and have their reference lists hand searched. A midwife's practice can be influenced by education and cultural practices but ultimately it should be informed by up-to-date research evidence. By analysing and synthesising the results of the studies, this systematic review will provide valuable insight into high-quality evidence-based midwifery care, which can inform practice, education and future research. PROSPERO CRD42018088300.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Midwives' practices during the second stage of labour vary nationally and internationally. We aim to retrieve evidence that supports high-quality intrapartum care by conducting a systematic review of the literature.
METHODS
Electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, EMBASE.com , Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Maternity and Infant Care Database (through MIDIRS), and The Cochrane Library will be searched to identify studies that meet the inclusion criteria. No language or publication date constraints will be applied. Articles that pass the two-stage screening process will then be assessed for risk of bias and have their reference lists hand searched.
DISCUSSION
A midwife's practice can be influenced by education and cultural practices but ultimately it should be informed by up-to-date research evidence. By analysing and synthesising the results of the studies, this systematic review will provide valuable insight into high-quality evidence-based midwifery care, which can inform practice, education and future research.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42018088300.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30606256
doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0916-1
pii: 10.1186/s13643-018-0916-1
pmc: PMC6317258
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1Références
Br J Clin Psychol. 2000 Mar;39(1):35-51
pubmed: 10789027
Midwifery. 2013 Jul;29(7):759-64
pubmed: 22884894
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 02;(3):CD007412
pubmed: 25730178
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e777-e779
pubmed: 27663682
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6
pubmed: 27005575
Birth. 2000 Jun;27(2):104-11
pubmed: 11251488
BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):577-83
pubmed: 19076128
Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):326-9
pubmed: 9251637