Use of computed tomography and diffusion weighted imaging in children with ventricular shunt.
Child
Child, Preschool
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Female
Humans
Hydrocephalus
/ surgery
Male
Neuroimaging
/ methods
Postoperative Complications
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiation Dosage
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
/ adverse effects
Diffusion weighted imaging
Radiation dose
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Journal
Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1433-0350
Titre abrégé: Childs Nerv Syst
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8503227
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
20
08
2018
accepted:
28
12
2018
pubmed:
9
1
2019
medline:
12
5
2020
entrez:
9
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the indications, number, and imaging results of brain computed tomography (CT) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt, to estimate the radiation dose, and to evaluate the effectiveness of DWI. This retrospectively study included 54 consecutive patients (boys/girls = 30/24, mean age, 3 ± 4.1 years) with shunt that were placed due to congenital abnormalities-hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy between January 2015 and March 2018. The presence of shunt-related complications (SRC) was assessed using clinical and neuroimaging findings, and the standard reference was accepted as the shunt revision. Size comparisons of ventricles were performed using Evans index and the frontal and occipital horn ratio, and each measurement made by the observers were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. A kappa coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated to assess the agreement between observers. The mean number of hospital admission, number of CT scans, and DWI were 5.8, 4.8, and 1.1, respectively per patient. A significant linear correlation was observed between hospital admission and CT scans (r = 0.288, p = 0.035). The number of CT scans and the cumulative effective dose per patient were higher in patients with SRC than in those without (p < 0.001). The mortality rate due to radiation-induced neoplasia has increased by 0.33% in the study period. The inter-observer agreement was perfect or substantial for the catheter visualization, assessment of the ventricular system on DWI, and for the image quality of DWI between observers (κ = 0.704-1, p ≤ 0.001). No significant difference was found between CT and DWI in the measurements of Evans index and the frontal and occipital horn ratio (p > 0.05). Inter-observer agreements between observers were almost perfect for the Evans index and the frontal and occipital horn ratio (ICC = 0.94-0.99, p < 0.001). An awareness of the use of CT in children is still inadequate and difficulties in the diagnosis of SRC probably cause the overuse of CT. DWI should be preferred in the diagnosis of SRC and the follow-up of patients. Otherwise, the increase in the prevalence of several diseases, particularly neoplasia, may be inevitable because of the over use of CT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30617617
doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-04046-3
pii: 10.1007/s00381-018-04046-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
477-486Références
World Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;80(6):e307-12
pubmed: 23111234
Pediatr Radiol. 2008 Jun;38(6):645-56
pubmed: 18392817
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Nov;33(10):1851-4
pubmed: 22555583
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Aug 1;167(8):700-7
pubmed: 23754213
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999 Mar;30(3):122-6
pubmed: 10352413
Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e47-54
pubmed: 24918222
Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):995-1003
pubmed: 18710988
World Neurosurg. 2014 Feb;81(2):404-10
pubmed: 23380280
Pol J Radiol. 2014 Oct 01;79:344-8
pubmed: 25289112
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Feb;190(2):273-4
pubmed: 18212208
J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):449-55
pubmed: 24472355
Neurosurgery. 2008 May;62(5):1095-102; discussion 1102-3
pubmed: 18580807
J Neurosurg. 2001 Feb;94(2):202-10
pubmed: 11213955
Neuroradiology. 1999 Jul;41(7):480-6
pubmed: 10450839
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009 Aug;56(4):745-55
pubmed: 19660625
J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101(2 Suppl):147-51
pubmed: 15835101
Neurosurgery. 2008 Feb;62(2):445-53; discussion 453-4
pubmed: 18382323
J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Mar;20(3):400-5
pubmed: 23266077
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002 Oct;18(5):337-40
pubmed: 12395002
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Feb;176(2):289-96
pubmed: 11159059
Childs Nerv Syst. 2012 Aug;28(8):1237-41
pubmed: 22729572
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998 Nov;29(5):245-9
pubmed: 9917541
Arch Dis Child. 2002 Sep;87(3):198-201
pubmed: 12193425
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jan;180(1):71-5
pubmed: 12490479
J Emerg Med. 2009 Jan;36(1):50-4
pubmed: 18343078
Pediatr Radiol. 2002 Apr;32(4):228-1; discussion 242-4
pubmed: 11956700
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):677-82
pubmed: 17766543
Radiographics. 1998 May-Jun;18(3):635-51
pubmed: 9599388
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Apr;24(4):201-10
pubmed: 18431216
Turk Neurosurg. 2011 Jan;21(1):66-73
pubmed: 21294094