Shared genome analyses of notable listeriosis outbreaks, highlighting the critical importance of epidemiological evidence, input datasets and interpretation criteria.
Listeria monocytogenes
clonal complex
genomic epidemiology
listeriosis
outbreak
whole genome sequencing
Journal
Microbial genomics
ISSN: 2057-5858
Titre abrégé: Microb Genom
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101671820
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
17
1
2019
medline:
17
8
2019
entrez:
17
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The persuasiveness of genomic evidence has pressured scientific agencies to supplement or replace well-established methodologies to inform public health and food safety decision-making. This study of 52 epidemiologically defined Listeria monocytogenes isolates, collected between 1981 and 2011, including nine outbreaks, was undertaken (1) to characterize their phylogenetic relationship at finished genome-level resolution, (2) to elucidate the underlying genetic diversity within an endemic subtype, CC8, and (3) to re-evaluate the genetic relationship and epidemiology of a CC8-delimited outbreak in Canada in 2008. Genomes representing Canadian Listeria outbreaks between 1981 and 2010 were closed and manually annotated. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and horizontally acquired traits were used to generate phylogenomic models. Phylogenomic relationships were congruent with classical subtyping and epidemiology, except for CC8 outbreaks, wherein the distribution of SNV and prophages revealed multiple co-evolving lineages. Chronophyletic reconstruction of CC8 evolution indicates that prophage-related genetic changes among CC8 strains manifest as PFGE subtype reversions, obscuring the relationship between CC8 isolates, and complicating the public health interpretation of subtyping data, even at maximum genome resolution. The size of the shared genome interrogated did not change the genetic relationship measured between highly related isolates near the tips of the phylogenetic tree, illustrating the robustness of these approaches for routine public health applications where the focus is recent ancestry. The possibility exists for temporally and epidemiologically distinct events to appear related even at maximum genome resolution, highlighting the continued importance of epidemiological evidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30648944
doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000237
pmc: PMC6412057
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Bacterial
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 1;61(3):305-12
pubmed: 25888672
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Feb;54(2):289-95
pubmed: 26582830
PLoS Pathog. 2008 Sep 05;4(9):e1000146
pubmed: 18773117
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 1;25(15):1968-9
pubmed: 19497936
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Oct;29(4):881-913
pubmed: 28590251
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;17(11):2113-21
pubmed: 22099115
BMC Genomics. 2013 Dec 17;14:895
pubmed: 24341328
Syst Biol. 2010 May;59(3):307-21
pubmed: 20525638
J Food Prot. 2014 Nov;77(11):1929-39
pubmed: 25364927
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jun;80(12):3632-44
pubmed: 24705322
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(Web Server issue):W347-52
pubmed: 21672955
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Sep 1;81(17):6024-37
pubmed: 26116683
J Microbiol Methods. 2008 Feb;72(2):141-8
pubmed: 18096258
N Engl J Med. 1983 Jan 27;308(4):203-6
pubmed: 6401354
Genome Biol. 2004;5(2):R12
pubmed: 14759262
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 25;5(6):e11147
pubmed: 20593022
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):944-53
pubmed: 24004121
J Food Prot. 2015 Jun;78(6):1132-41
pubmed: 26038903
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 21;112(29):9070-5
pubmed: 26153419
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Oct 10;2:16185
pubmed: 27723724
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Jul;31(7):592-4
pubmed: 23839141
Microb Genom. 2017 Jun 8;3(6):e000116
pubmed: 29026651
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Mar;78(6):1876-89
pubmed: 22247147
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(Web Server issue):W129-32
pubmed: 23677610
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015 Aug;12(8):645-52
pubmed: 26258258
Zoonoses Public Health. 2016 Feb;63(1):62-71
pubmed: 25996458
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jun;17(6):1110-2
pubmed: 21749783
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Nov 20;82(3):939-53
pubmed: 26590290
Genome Res. 2008 May;18(5):802-9
pubmed: 18332092
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Feb 15;44(4):521-8
pubmed: 17243054
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;19(1):1-9; quiz 184
pubmed: 23260661
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 May 08;13:87
pubmed: 22568821
Environ Microbiol. 2014 Feb;16(2):405-16
pubmed: 24274459
Genome Med. 2013 Apr 29;5(4):36
pubmed: 23673226
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015 Dec;12(12):966-71
pubmed: 26583272
Clin Microbiol Infect. 1996 Aug;2(1):2-11
pubmed: 11866804
Epidemiol Infect. 2010 Apr;138(4):559-72
pubmed: 19818199
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Sep;53(9):2877-88
pubmed: 26135867
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015 Oct;12(10):820-7
pubmed: 26259128
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Jun;8(6):390
pubmed: 20467444
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006 Spring;3(1):20-31
pubmed: 16602976
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42448
pubmed: 22860127
Front Genet. 2015 Jul 07;6:235
pubmed: 26217378
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 1;63(3):380-6
pubmed: 27090985
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Dec;54(12):2850-2853
pubmed: 27629902
Genome Biol. 2014 Nov 18;15(11):538
pubmed: 25418119
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Apr;46(4):1435-50
pubmed: 18256218
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 May;50(5):1748-51
pubmed: 22337989
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Sep 1;81(17):6059-69
pubmed: 26116668
Public Health Genomics. 2013;16(1-2):25-30
pubmed: 23548714
Int J Med Microbiol. 2011 Feb;301(2):79-96
pubmed: 20708964
BMC Genomics. 2008 Nov 13;9:539
pubmed: 19014550
BMC Genomics. 2010 Feb 18;11:120
pubmed: 20167121