Peptimapper: proteogenomics workflow for the expert annotation of eukaryotic genomes.
Bioinformatics
Genome annotation
Peptide sequence tag
Proteogenomics
Proteomics
Tandem mass spectrometry
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jan 2019
17 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
26
02
2018
accepted:
03
01
2019
entrez:
19
1
2019
pubmed:
19
1
2019
medline:
30
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurate structural annotation of genomes is still a challenge, despite the progress made over the past decade. The prediction of gene structure remains difficult, especially for eukaryotic species, and is often erroneous and incomplete. We used a proteogenomics strategy, taking advantage of the combination of proteomics datasets and bioinformatics tools, to identify novel protein coding-genes and splice isoforms, assign correct start sites, and validate predicted exons and genes. Our proteogenomics workflow, Peptimapper, was applied to the genome annotation of Ectocarpus sp., a key reference genome for both the brown algal lineage and stramenopiles. We generated proteomics data from various life cycle stages of Ectocarpus sp. strains and sub-cellular fractions using a shotgun approach. First, we directly generated peptide sequence tags (PSTs) from the proteomics data. Second, we mapped PSTs onto the translated genomic sequence. Closely located hits (i.e., PSTs locations on the genome) were then clustered to detect potential coding regions based on parameters optimized for the organism. Third, we evaluated each cluster and compared it to gene predictions from existing conventional genome annotation approaches. Finally, we integrated cluster locations into GFF files to use a genome viewer. We identified two potential novel genes, a ribosomal protein L22 and an aryl sulfotransferase and corrected the gene structure of a dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase. We experimentally validated the results by RT-PCR and using transcriptomics data. Peptimapper is a complementary tool for the expert annotation of genomes. It is suitable for any organism and is distributed through a Docker image available on two public bioinformatics docker repositories: Docker Hub and BioShaDock. This workflow is also accessible through the Galaxy framework and for use by non-computer scientists at https://galaxy.protim.eu . Data are available via ProteomeXchange under identifier PXD010618.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Accurate structural annotation of genomes is still a challenge, despite the progress made over the past decade. The prediction of gene structure remains difficult, especially for eukaryotic species, and is often erroneous and incomplete. We used a proteogenomics strategy, taking advantage of the combination of proteomics datasets and bioinformatics tools, to identify novel protein coding-genes and splice isoforms, assign correct start sites, and validate predicted exons and genes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our proteogenomics workflow, Peptimapper, was applied to the genome annotation of Ectocarpus sp., a key reference genome for both the brown algal lineage and stramenopiles. We generated proteomics data from various life cycle stages of Ectocarpus sp. strains and sub-cellular fractions using a shotgun approach. First, we directly generated peptide sequence tags (PSTs) from the proteomics data. Second, we mapped PSTs onto the translated genomic sequence. Closely located hits (i.e., PSTs locations on the genome) were then clustered to detect potential coding regions based on parameters optimized for the organism. Third, we evaluated each cluster and compared it to gene predictions from existing conventional genome annotation approaches. Finally, we integrated cluster locations into GFF files to use a genome viewer. We identified two potential novel genes, a ribosomal protein L22 and an aryl sulfotransferase and corrected the gene structure of a dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase. We experimentally validated the results by RT-PCR and using transcriptomics data.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Peptimapper is a complementary tool for the expert annotation of genomes. It is suitable for any organism and is distributed through a Docker image available on two public bioinformatics docker repositories: Docker Hub and BioShaDock. This workflow is also accessible through the Galaxy framework and for use by non-computer scientists at https://galaxy.protim.eu . Data are available via ProteomeXchange under identifier PXD010618.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30654742
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5431-9
pii: 10.1186/s12864-019-5431-9
pmc: PMC6337836
doi:
Substances chimiques
Codon
0
Peptides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
56Subventions
Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche
ID : ANR-10-BTBR-04-02
Références
Anal Chem. 2001 May 1;73(9):1917-26
pubmed: 11354471
Proteomics. 2001 May;1(5):641-50
pubmed: 11678034
Proteomics. 2004 Jan;4(1):59-77
pubmed: 14730672
Anal Chem. 2005 Feb 15;77(4):964-73
pubmed: 15858974
BMC Genomics. 2005 Sep 19;6:128
pubmed: 16171517
Anal Chem. 2007 Feb 15;79(4):1393-400
pubmed: 17243770
J Proteome Res. 2008 May;7(5):1873-83
pubmed: 18348511
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 23;9:393
pubmed: 18811941
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 30;105(52):21034-8
pubmed: 19098097
PLoS Genet. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000434
pubmed: 19370165
Genome Biol. 2009;10(6):R66
pubmed: 19531237
J Proteome Res. 2010 Feb 5;9(2):990-6
pubmed: 20000637
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;604:137-44
pubmed: 20013369
Proteomics. 2010 Jun;10(11):2074-88
pubmed: 20373519
New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(1):42-51
pubmed: 20456050
Nature. 2010 Jun 3;465(7298):617-21
pubmed: 20520714
Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R86
pubmed: 20738864
New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(1):1-4
pubmed: 20840144
Mol Biosyst. 2011 Feb;7(2):284-91
pubmed: 20967315
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Apr 22;12:115
pubmed: 21513508
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 12;108(28):11518-23
pubmed: 21709217
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 Feb;11(2):M111.012682
pubmed: 21997732
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27587
pubmed: 22114679
Bioinformatics. 2012 Feb 15;28(4):464-9
pubmed: 22199388
Plant J. 2012 Aug;71(3):366-77
pubmed: 22394375
J Proteomics. 2012 Jul 16;75(13):3898-913
pubmed: 22575386
J Proteome Res. 2013 Jun 7;12(6):3019-25
pubmed: 23614390
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1002:267-94
pubmed: 23625410
Proteomics. 2013 Oct;13(18-19):2731-42
pubmed: 23636904
J Proteomics. 2013 Jun 28;86:27-42
pubmed: 23665149
BMC Genomics. 2013 Dec 21;14:909
pubmed: 24359479
J Proteomics. 2014 Jun 13;105:5-18
pubmed: 24440519
Plant J. 2014 Oct;80(2):367-81
pubmed: 25065645
BMC Genomics. 2014 Aug 22;15:703
pubmed: 25149441
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 8;24(17):1945-57
pubmed: 25176635
Biol Reprod. 2014 Nov;91(5):123
pubmed: 25210130
Proteomics. 2014 Dec;14(23-24):2731-41
pubmed: 25297486
J Proteome Res. 2014 Dec 5;13(12):5898-908
pubmed: 25301683
Nat Methods. 2014 Nov;11(11):1114-25
pubmed: 25357241
Proteomics. 2014 Dec;14(23-24):2631-2
pubmed: 25469796
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Mar 11;43(5):e29
pubmed: 25510491
J Proteome Res. 2015 May 1;14(5):2255-66
pubmed: 25760677
J Proteome Res. 2015 Jul 2;14(7):2784-91
pubmed: 26004133
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015 Nov;14(11):3087-93
pubmed: 26269333
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0140535
pubmed: 26496392
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D447-56
pubmed: 26527722
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016 Jan;15(1):329-39
pubmed: 26560066
Mass Spectrom Rev. 2017 Sep;36(5):584-599
pubmed: 26670565
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1410:77-89
pubmed: 26867739
F1000Res. 2015 Dec 14;4:1443
pubmed: 26913191
J Phycol. 2008 Oct;44(5):1315-21
pubmed: 27041728
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 05;7:427
pubmed: 27092112
J Proteome Res. 2016 Jul 1;15(7):2309-20
pubmed: 27225868
Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 02;7:11778
pubmed: 27250503
New Phytol. 2017 Apr;214(1):219-232
pubmed: 27870061
Methods Enzymol. 2017;585:201-216
pubmed: 28109430
J Integr Bioinform. 2016 Dec 18;13(4):293
pubmed: 28187409
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 03;7:43241
pubmed: 28256542
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2017 Jun;16(6):959-981
pubmed: 28456751
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e43-e46
pubmed: 29092937
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 2;9(1):903
pubmed: 29500430
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W537-W544
pubmed: 29790989
J Proteome Res. 2018 Sep 5;:null
pubmed: 30130115
Anal Chem. 1994 Dec 15;66(24):4390-9
pubmed: 7847635
Anal Chem. 1995 Sep 15;67(18):3202-10
pubmed: 8686885