2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial.
3D
Laparoscopic
Rectal cancer
Three-dimensional
Total mesorectal excision
Trial
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
20
08
2018
accepted:
17
12
2018
pubmed:
19
1
2019
medline:
15
5
2020
entrez:
19
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of laparoscopy in rectal cancer has been questioned. 3D laparoscopic systems are suggested to aid optimal surgical performance but have not been evaluated in advanced procedures. We hypothesised that stereoscopic imaging could improve the performance of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME). A multicentre developmental randomised controlled trial comparing 2D and 3D laparoscopic TME was performed (ISRCTN59485808). Trial surgeons were colorectal consultants that had completed their TME proficiency curve and underwent stereoscopic visual testing. Patients requiring elective laparoscopic TME with curative intent were centrally randomised (1:1) to 2D or 3D using Karl Storz IMAGE1 S D3-Link™ and 10-mm TIPCAM®1S 3D passive polarising laparoscopic systems. Outcomes were enacted adverse events as assessed by the observational clinical human reliability analysis technique, intraoperative data, 30-day patient outcomes, histopathological specimen assessment and surgeon cognitive load. 88 patients were included. There were no differences in patient or tumour demographics, surgeon stereopsis, case difficulty, cognitive load, operative time, blood loss or conversion between the trial arms. 1377 intraoperative adverse events were identified (median 18 per case, IQR 14-21, range 2-49) with no differences seen between the 2D and 3D arms (18 (95% CI 17-21) vs. 17 (95% CI 16-19), p = 0.437). 3D laparoscopy had non-significantly higher mesorectal fascial plane resections (94 vs. 77%, p = 0.059; OR 0.23 (95% CI 0.05-1.16)) but equal lymph node yield and circumferential margin distance and involvement. 30-day morbidity, anastomotic leak, re-operation, length of stay and readmission rates were equal between the 2D and 3D arms. Feasibility of performing multicentre 3D laparoscopic multicentre trials of specialist performed complex procedures is shown. 3D imaging did not alter the number of intraoperative adverse events; however, a potential improvement in mesorectal specimen quality was observed and should form the focus of future 3D laparoscopic TME trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30656453
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9
pii: 10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9
pmc: PMC6722156
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN59485808']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3370-3383Références
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 1;20(7):1729-34
pubmed: 11919228
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):821-8
pubmed: 19269520
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96
pubmed: 19638912
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12
pubmed: 19782876
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jul;11(7):637-45
pubmed: 20610322
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jun;13(6):614-6
pubmed: 21564472
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):796-803
pubmed: 22042584
Br J Surg. 2012 Sep;99(9):1219-26
pubmed: 22864881
Lancet. 1986 Jun 28;1(8496):1479-82
pubmed: 2425199
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 15;(4):CD005200
pubmed: 24737031
Ann Surg. 2014 Aug;260(2):220-9
pubmed: 24743623
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):767-74
pubmed: 24837215
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):716-22
pubmed: 25072446
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Mar;17(3):197-204
pubmed: 25421215
Colorectal Dis. 2015 May;17(5):O115-22
pubmed: 25714054
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32
pubmed: 25830422
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):11-23
pubmed: 25840896
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1346-55
pubmed: 26441179
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63
pubmed: 26441180
Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):234-9
pubmed: 26501704
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Jun;20(6):361-367
pubmed: 27154295
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Oct;20(10):683-93
pubmed: 27510524
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug 16;9(8):368-377
pubmed: 28874957
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580
pubmed: 29067426
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2986-2993
pubmed: 29368286
Br J Surg. 2018 Apr;105(5):491-501
pubmed: 29465749
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):e181607
pubmed: 29874375
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):589-595
pubmed: 30080730
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):596-602
pubmed: 30247332
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3251-3274
pubmed: 30515610
Lancet. 1998 Jan 24;351(9098):248-51
pubmed: 9457094