Intramuscular injection, intravenous infusion, and intravenous bolus of oxytocin in the third stage of labor for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a three-arm randomized control trial.


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 14 06 2018
accepted: 07 01 2019
entrez: 20 1 2019
pubmed: 20 1 2019
medline: 9 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Oxytocin for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) prophylaxis is commonly administered by either intramuscular (IM) injection or intravenous (IV) infusion with both routes recommended equally and little discussion of potential differences between the two. This trial assesses the effectiveness and safety of 10 IU oxytocin administered as IM injection versus IV infusion and IV bolus during the third stage of labor for PPH prophylaxis. In two tertiary level Egyptian maternity hospitals, women delivering vaginally without exposure to pre-delivery uterotonics were randomized to one of three prophylactic oxytocin administration groups after delivery of the baby. Blood loss was measured 1 h after delivery, and side effects were recorded. Primary outcomes were mean postpartum blood loss and proportion of women with postpartum blood loss ≥500 ml in this open-label, three-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial. Four thousand nine hundred thirteen eligible, consenting women were randomized. Compared to IM injection, mean blood loss was 5.9% less in the IV infusion arm (95% CI: -8.5, - 3.3) and 11.1% less in the IV bolus arm (95% CI: -14.7, - 7.8). Risk of postpartum blood loss ≥500 ml in the IV infusion arm was significantly less compared to IM injection (0.8% vs. 1.5%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.91). No side effects were reported in any arm. Intravenous oxytocin is more effective than intramuscular injection for the prevention of PPH in the third stage of labor. Oxytocin delivered by IV bolus presents no safety concerns after vaginal delivery and should be considered a safe option for PPH prophylaxis. clinicaltrials.gov # NCT01914419 , posted August 2, 2013.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Oxytocin for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) prophylaxis is commonly administered by either intramuscular (IM) injection or intravenous (IV) infusion with both routes recommended equally and little discussion of potential differences between the two. This trial assesses the effectiveness and safety of 10 IU oxytocin administered as IM injection versus IV infusion and IV bolus during the third stage of labor for PPH prophylaxis.
METHODS METHODS
In two tertiary level Egyptian maternity hospitals, women delivering vaginally without exposure to pre-delivery uterotonics were randomized to one of three prophylactic oxytocin administration groups after delivery of the baby. Blood loss was measured 1 h after delivery, and side effects were recorded. Primary outcomes were mean postpartum blood loss and proportion of women with postpartum blood loss ≥500 ml in this open-label, three-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial.
RESULTS RESULTS
Four thousand nine hundred thirteen eligible, consenting women were randomized. Compared to IM injection, mean blood loss was 5.9% less in the IV infusion arm (95% CI: -8.5, - 3.3) and 11.1% less in the IV bolus arm (95% CI: -14.7, - 7.8). Risk of postpartum blood loss ≥500 ml in the IV infusion arm was significantly less compared to IM injection (0.8% vs. 1.5%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.91). No side effects were reported in any arm.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Intravenous oxytocin is more effective than intramuscular injection for the prevention of PPH in the third stage of labor. Oxytocin delivered by IV bolus presents no safety concerns after vaginal delivery and should be considered a safe option for PPH prophylaxis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
clinicaltrials.gov # NCT01914419 , posted August 2, 2013.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30658605
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2181-2
pii: 10.1186/s12884-019-2181-2
pmc: PMC6339323
doi:

Substances chimiques

Oxytocics 0
Oxytocin 50-56-6

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01914419']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

38

Références

Lancet. 2001 Sep 1;358(9283):689-95
pubmed: 11551574
Lancet. 2002 Feb 23;359(9307):707-8; discussion 709-10
pubmed: 11879890
BJOG. 2002 Feb;109(2):173-7
pubmed: 11905429
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;100(6):1301-12
pubmed: 12468178
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Jan;23(1):13-6
pubmed: 12623474
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;49(1):76-7
pubmed: 14710151
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2004;58(2):72-6
pubmed: 15103233
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):294-9
pubmed: 15684155
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;98(1):116-9
pubmed: 17142825
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD000494
pubmed: 17636640
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Jul;29(5):396-401
pubmed: 19603316
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 04;(8):CD006173
pubmed: 20687079
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 May;117(2):108-18
pubmed: 22502595
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;(8):CD000494
pubmed: 22895917
Am J Perinatol. 2013 Aug;30(7):523-8
pubmed: 23208766
Reprod Sci. 2013 Sep;20(9):1011-9
pubmed: 23296037
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Feb 21;13:46
pubmed: 23433172
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 30;(10):CD001808
pubmed: 24173606
Can J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;61(9):808-18
pubmed: 24906304
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Nov;127(2):175-9
pubmed: 25108586
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 02;(3):CD007412
pubmed: 25730178
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jun;293(6):1219-25
pubmed: 26538357
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;294(5):911-916
pubmed: 26980230
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 22;9:CD009332
pubmed: 30246877
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972 Jul;79(7):644-6
pubmed: 5043430
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970 Nov 1;108(5):751-60
pubmed: 5311917
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1978;57(2):97-103
pubmed: 636863
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Nov;103(11):1068-73
pubmed: 8916990

Auteurs

Dyanna Charles (D)

Gynuity Health Projects, 220 East 42nd St, Suite 710, New York, NY, 10010, USA. dcharles@gynuity.org.

Holly Anger (H)

Gynuity Health Projects, 220 East 42nd St, Suite 710, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

Rasha Dabash (R)

Gynuity Health Projects, 220 East 42nd St, Suite 710, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

Emad Darwish (E)

Shatby Maternity Hospital, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Mohamed Cherine Ramadan (MC)

El Galaa Teaching Hospital, 41 El-Galaa, Cairo, Egypt.

Amr Mansy (A)

Shatby Maternity Hospital, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Yomna Salem (Y)

El Galaa Teaching Hospital, 41 El-Galaa, Cairo, Egypt.

Ilana G Dzuba (IG)

Gynuity Health Projects, 220 East 42nd St, Suite 710, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

Meagan E Byrne (ME)

Gynuity Health Projects, 220 East 42nd St, Suite 710, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

Miral Breebaart (M)

Independent Consultant, 16B Dr. Mostafa el Diwani, Garden City, Cairo, Egypt.

Beverly Winikoff (B)

Gynuity Health Projects, 220 East 42nd St, Suite 710, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH