What is the outcome for patients undergoing more than two ileocolonic resections for recurrent Crohn's disease? A comparative study of 569 consecutive procedures.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colectomy
/ adverse effects
Colon
/ surgery
Crohn Disease
/ pathology
Female
Humans
Ileum
/ surgery
Laparoscopy
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Recurrence
Reoperation
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Crohn's disease
laparoscopic
outcomes
recurrence
surgery
Journal
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
ISSN: 1463-1318
Titre abrégé: Colorectal Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
11
11
2018
accepted:
31
12
2018
pubmed:
20
1
2019
medline:
26
9
2020
entrez:
20
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the outcome for patients undergoing repeated ileocolonic resection for recurrent Crohn's disease (CD). All patients undergoing ileocolonic resection for terminal ileal CD between 1998 and 2016 in our tertiary care centre were retrospectively reviewed. Between 1998 and 2016, 569 ileocolonic resections were performed for CD: 403 of these were primary resections (1R, 71%), 107 second resections (2R, 19%) and 59 were third (or more) resections (> 2R, 10%). The laparoscopic approach rate was significantly less in the > 2R group (20/59, 34%) compared with the 2R (71/107, 66%; P = 0.002) and 1R (366/403, 91%) groups. However, conversion to an open approach did not show any difference between the three groups [1R group 46/366 (13%) vs 2R group 14/71 (20%) vs > 2R group 3/20 (15%); 1R vs > 2R P = 0.750; 2R vs > 2R P = 0.633]. Postoperative morbidity was significantly increased in the > 2R (28/59, 52%) group compared with the 1R group (115/403, 29%; P < 0.001) but showed no difference compared with the 2R group (43/107, 40%; P = 0.365). There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) [1R group n = 24 (6%); 2R group n = 6 (6%); > 2R group n = 4, 7%; 1R vs > 2R P = 0.865, 2R vs > 2R P = 0.761]. Although the overall morbidity rate was higher, repeated surgery for recurrent CD in patients undergoing three or more ileocolonic resections was not associated with an increased risk of severe postoperative morbidity in our series.
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
563-569Informations de copyright
Colorectal Disease © 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.