A randomized trial of decision support for tobacco dependence treatment in an inpatient electronic medical record: clinical results.
Clinical Decision-Making
Decision Support Techniques
Electronic Health Records
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ statistics & numerical data
Prospective Studies
Smoking Cessation
/ methods
Tobacco Use Cessation Devices
Tobacco Use Disorder
/ prevention & control
Treatment Outcome
Decision support
Electronic health records
Smoking cessation
Tobacco dependence treatment
Journal
Implementation science : IS
ISSN: 1748-5908
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101258411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 01 2019
22 01 2019
Historique:
received:
20
08
2018
accepted:
11
01
2019
entrez:
24
1
2019
pubmed:
24
1
2019
medline:
14
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Smokers usually abstain from tobacco while hospitalized but relapse after discharge. Inpatient interventions may encourage sustained quitting. We previously demonstrated that a decision support tool embedded in an electronic health record (EHR) improved physicians' treatment of hospitalized smokers. This report describes the effect on quit rates of this decision support tool and order set for hospitalized smokers. In a single hospital system, 254 physicians were randomized 1:1 to receive a decision support tool and order set, embedded in the EHR. When an adult patient was admitted to a medical service, an electronic alert appeared if current smoking was recorded in the EHR. For physicians receiving the intervention, the alert linked to an order set for tobacco treatment medications and electronic referral to the state tobacco quitline. Additionally, "Tobacco Use Disorder" was added to the patient's problem list, and a secure message was sent to the patient's primary care provider (PCP). In the control arm, no alert appeared. Patients were contacted by phone at 1, 6, and 12 months; those reporting tobacco abstinence at 12 months were asked to return to measure exhaled carbon monoxide. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the data. From 2013 to 2016, the alert fired for 10,939 patients (5391 intervention, 5548 control). Compared to control physicians, intervention physicians were more likely to order tobacco treatment medication, populate the problem list with tobacco use disorder, refer to the quitline, and notify the patient's PCP. In a subset of 1044 patients recruited for intensive follow-up, one-year quit rates for intervention and control patients were, respectively, 11.5% and 11.6%, (p = 0.94), after controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance. Similarly, there were no differences in 1- and 6-month quit rates. Although we were able to improve processes of care, long-term tobacco quit rates were unchanged. This likely reflects, in part, the need for sustained quitting interventions, and higher-than-expected quit rates in controls. Future enhancements should improve prescription of medications for smoking cessation at discharge, engagement of primary care providers, and perhaps direct engagement of patients in a more longitudinal approach. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01691105 . Registered on September 12, 2012.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Smokers usually abstain from tobacco while hospitalized but relapse after discharge. Inpatient interventions may encourage sustained quitting. We previously demonstrated that a decision support tool embedded in an electronic health record (EHR) improved physicians' treatment of hospitalized smokers. This report describes the effect on quit rates of this decision support tool and order set for hospitalized smokers.
METHODS
In a single hospital system, 254 physicians were randomized 1:1 to receive a decision support tool and order set, embedded in the EHR. When an adult patient was admitted to a medical service, an electronic alert appeared if current smoking was recorded in the EHR. For physicians receiving the intervention, the alert linked to an order set for tobacco treatment medications and electronic referral to the state tobacco quitline. Additionally, "Tobacco Use Disorder" was added to the patient's problem list, and a secure message was sent to the patient's primary care provider (PCP). In the control arm, no alert appeared. Patients were contacted by phone at 1, 6, and 12 months; those reporting tobacco abstinence at 12 months were asked to return to measure exhaled carbon monoxide. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the data.
RESULTS
From 2013 to 2016, the alert fired for 10,939 patients (5391 intervention, 5548 control). Compared to control physicians, intervention physicians were more likely to order tobacco treatment medication, populate the problem list with tobacco use disorder, refer to the quitline, and notify the patient's PCP. In a subset of 1044 patients recruited for intensive follow-up, one-year quit rates for intervention and control patients were, respectively, 11.5% and 11.6%, (p = 0.94), after controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance. Similarly, there were no differences in 1- and 6-month quit rates.
CONCLUSIONS
Although we were able to improve processes of care, long-term tobacco quit rates were unchanged. This likely reflects, in part, the need for sustained quitting interventions, and higher-than-expected quit rates in controls. Future enhancements should improve prescription of medications for smoking cessation at discharge, engagement of primary care providers, and perhaps direct engagement of patients in a more longitudinal approach.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01691105 . Registered on September 12, 2012.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30670043
doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0856-8
pii: 10.1186/s13012-019-0856-8
pmc: PMC6343239
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01691105']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Pagination
8Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R18 HL108788
Pays : United States
Références
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):566-77
pubmed: 27647057
Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77
pubmed: 12090408
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Feb;15(1):89-94
pubmed: 18277192
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;(5):CD001837
pubmed: 22592676
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26
pubmed: 22310560
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 3;347(14):1087-93
pubmed: 12362011
Transl Behav Med. 2014 Sep;4(3):324-32
pubmed: 25264471
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Apr;33(2):189-99
pubmed: 17447871
Circulation. 2016 Jan 5;133(1):21-30
pubmed: 26553744
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Apr 1;148(7):554-6
pubmed: 18378950
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):501-4
pubmed: 20647183
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):185-195
pubmed: 28194729
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):382-5
pubmed: 20042745
Chest. 2000 Aug;118(2 Suppl):40S-46S
pubmed: 10939998
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 29;366(13):1172-4
pubmed: 22417200
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Dec;13(12):2012-22
pubmed: 15598756
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):597-608
pubmed: 27647060
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):247-53
pubmed: 24314401