Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.
Adult
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia
/ therapy
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
/ epidemiology
Defibrillators, Implantable
Electrocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Primary Prevention
/ methods
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
/ epidemiology
Survival Rate
/ trends
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2019
01 04 2019
Historique:
received:
05
11
2018
revised:
19
12
2018
accepted:
20
12
2018
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
10
1
2020
entrez:
26
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy remains a corner stone of sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). We aimed to assess predictors of appropriate ICD therapies in the Scandinavian cohort of ARVC patients who received ICD for primary prevention of SCD. Study group comprised of 79 definite ARVC patients by 2010 Task Force criteria (60% male, age at ICD implant 39 ± 14 years) who were enrolled in the Nordic ARVC Registry and received an ICD for primary SCD prevention. The primary end point of appropriate ICD shock or death from any cause was assessed and compared with 137 definite ARVC patients who received ICD for secondary SCD prevention (74% male, age at ICD implant 42 ± 15 years). In the study group, 38% were ≤35 years of age at baseline, 25% had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and 29% had syncope at baseline. Major repolarization abnormality (hazard ratio = 4.00, 95% confidence interval 1.30 to 12.30, p = 0.015) and age ≤35 years (hazard ratio = 4.21, 95% confidence interval 1.49 to 11.85, p = 0.001) independently predicted the primary end point. The outcome did not differ between the primary prevention patients with either of these risk factors and the secondary prevention cohort (2% to 4% annual event rate) whereas patients without risk factors did not have any appropriate ICD shocks during follow-up. In conclusion, young age at ARVC diagnosis and major repolarization abnormality independently predict ICD shocks or death in the primary prevention ICD recipients and associated with the event rate similar to the one observed in the secondary prevention cohort. Our data indicate the benefit of ICD for primary prevention in patients with any of these risk factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30678832
pii: S0002-9149(19)30056-6
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.12.049
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1156-1162Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.