Image quality and radiation dose of ECG-triggered High-Pitch Dual-Source cardiac computed tomography angiography in children for the evaluation of central vascular stents.
Adolescent
Age Factors
Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques
/ adverse effects
Child
Child, Preschool
Computed Tomography Angiography
/ adverse effects
Electrocardiography
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Peripheral Arterial Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Predictive Value of Tests
Prosthesis Design
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Exposure
/ adverse effects
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Stents
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Cardiac CT
Children
Dual-source CT
ECG-triggered
High Pitch
Stent
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
09
05
2018
accepted:
17
01
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
23
4
2019
entrez:
27
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Assess image quality and radiation dose of ECG-triggered High-Pitch Dual-Source CTA for the evaluation central vascular stents in children. We included all children ≤ 21 years old with one or more central vascular stents and available prospective ECG-triggered High-Pitch Dual-Source CTA performed at our institution between January 2015 and August 2017. Demographic and scanner information was retrieved. Two board-certified pediatric radiologists blinded to the clinical data, independently reviewed and scored each case using a four-point quality score. Scores 1, 2 and 3 were considered of diagnostic image quality. Inter-observer agreement and non-parametric test were used. 18 patients (10 girls, 8 boys) with a mean age of 9.47 ± 7.38 years (mean ± SD) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-two central vascular stents were evaluated. Mean quality score was 2.07 ± 0.94 with 12.5% (4/32) of the cases classified as unevaluable. Interobserver agreement was excellent (k = 0.86). There is no significant difference between quality score and stent location (p = 0.07). There is a significant difference with stent material as all non-diagnostic scores were only seen in covered stents made of platinum-iridium (p < 0.001). There was no association between image quality and age, height, weight, BSA, heart rate, radiation dose or stent lumen size (p > 0.05). ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral DS-CTA offers appropriate image quality for assessment of central vascular stents in children.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30684082
doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01539-3
pii: 10.1007/s10554-019-01539-3
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
367-374Références
Fam Med. 2005 May;37(5):360-3
pubmed: 15883903
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Mar;67(3):477-81
pubmed: 16475177
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Jul;68(1):11-20
pubmed: 16764005
Biomaterials. 2007 Mar;28(9):1689-710
pubmed: 17188349
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 6;49(9):951-9
pubmed: 17336718
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):677-82
pubmed: 17766543
Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):567-76
pubmed: 17848683
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Jun;24(5):535-46
pubmed: 18368512
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):1241-6
pubmed: 18430838
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008 Jun;20(3):243-7
pubmed: 18475090
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct 1;72(4):544-51
pubmed: 18814228
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec;68(3):362-8
pubmed: 18842371
J Artif Organs. 2009;12(2):73-9
pubmed: 19536623
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Mar;77(3):436-42
pubmed: 19783395
Eur Heart J. 2010 Feb;31(3):340-6
pubmed: 19897497
Circulation. 1991 Jun;83(6):1923-39
pubmed: 2040045
Singapore Med J. 2010 Jun;51(6):457-63
pubmed: 20658103
Invest Radiol. 2011 Feb;46(2):116-23
pubmed: 20856124
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Oct;195(4):865-71
pubmed: 20858811
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Dec;80(3):e440-5
pubmed: 21310567
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2012;8:Doc02
pubmed: 22536300
Eur Radiol. 2012 Oct;22(10):2057-66
pubmed: 22592808
Magn Reson Med. 2013 May;69(5):1438-42
pubmed: 22700326
ISRN Cardiol. 2012;2012:139823
pubmed: 22997590
Radiology. 2013 Mar;266(3):979-87
pubmed: 23249571
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Apr;82(4):617-22
pubmed: 23265926
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Apr;6(4):458-65
pubmed: 23498678
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 Nov;47(8):625-31
pubmed: 24048257
Vasa. 2013 Nov;42(6):395-412
pubmed: 24220116
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015 Aug;18(10):1066-1071
pubmed: 24460213
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Nov;15(11):1238-45
pubmed: 24939952
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;20(4):499-503
pubmed: 25564579
Eur Radiol. 2016 Apr;26(4):1149-58
pubmed: 26255034
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 Aug 27;8:359-67
pubmed: 26345228
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jan-Feb;10(1):13-21
pubmed: 26524989
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Apr 09;11:47
pubmed: 27059600
Pediatr Cardiol. 2016 Dec;37(8):1525-1533
pubmed: 27567910
J Radiol Prot. 2016 Dec;36(4):N57-N66
pubmed: 27642775
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 31;12(1):e0171138
pubmed: 28141852
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jul;104(1):190-196
pubmed: 28274523
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;15(4):257-266
pubmed: 28293976
Clin Radiol. 2017 Oct;72(10):864-870
pubmed: 28576437
Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Oct;38(7):1393-1399
pubmed: 28689328
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2017 Sep;45(6):527-532
pubmed: 28902643
Eur J Pediatr. 1989 Feb;148(5):389-92
pubmed: 2920744
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;55(4):584-592
pubmed: 29426592