ABO-identical matching has no superiority in long-term survival in comparison to ABO-compatible matching in lung transplantation.
ABO-blood group
Lung transplantation
Patient outcome
Survival
Journal
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery
ISSN: 1749-8090
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jan 2019
28 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
01
06
2018
accepted:
15
01
2019
entrez:
30
1
2019
pubmed:
30
1
2019
medline:
8
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Even though identical blood group matching between recipient and donor is preferred, it is still not clear by how much this improves the outcome for patients who received a lung transplant (LTx), or whether there is any survival benefit. Earlier studies have yielded ambiguous results and few have investigated long-term survival. The aim of this study is, therefore, to explore the different outcomes of identical and compatible recipient and donor blood group matching to determine whether identical matching is superior (LTx). Between January 1990 to June 2016, 297 patients underwent primary LTx, 10 patients underwent heart and lung transplantation (HLTx), and 18 patients required re-transplantation (Re-LTx) at Skåne University Hospital in Lund. With a total of 325 transplantations at our center, 262 were ABO-identically matched while 53 were ABO-compatible. For survival analyses, the end-point used was retransplantation-free survival in addition to excluding HLTx (n = 10), assessed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier. ABO-compatible patients had a median of 49 days (2-641), and ABO-identical patients had a median of 89 days (1-1717) (p = 0.048) on the transplant waiting list. Patients with a limited survival up to 1-year showed significant difference in survival rate for ABO-compatible recipients compared to ABO-identical recipients (p < 0.05), however no significant difference was shown in overall survival between the two groups (p > 0.05), with the same pattern shown in patients with a limited survival rate up to ten years, emphysema-patients, when excluding single-LTx and patients transplanted before 2005 and after 2005, respectively (p > 0.05). Recipients who received ABO-compatible matched grafts showed a similar survival rate to recipients who received ABO-identical matched grafts in the present study. Cytolomegalovirus and Ebstein Barr Virus mismatch were also identified as risk factors particular among emphysema patients. Since ABO-identical transplantations and ABO-compatible transplantations showed similar results, the present selection-bias of preferring ABO-identical lungs could be adjusted to increase organ allocation. It might also be possible to shorten recipient waiting list time, as an identical match showed over 80% higher time on the waiting list than a compatible, non-identical match.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Even though identical blood group matching between recipient and donor is preferred, it is still not clear by how much this improves the outcome for patients who received a lung transplant (LTx), or whether there is any survival benefit. Earlier studies have yielded ambiguous results and few have investigated long-term survival. The aim of this study is, therefore, to explore the different outcomes of identical and compatible recipient and donor blood group matching to determine whether identical matching is superior (LTx).
METHOD
METHODS
Between January 1990 to June 2016, 297 patients underwent primary LTx, 10 patients underwent heart and lung transplantation (HLTx), and 18 patients required re-transplantation (Re-LTx) at Skåne University Hospital in Lund. With a total of 325 transplantations at our center, 262 were ABO-identically matched while 53 were ABO-compatible. For survival analyses, the end-point used was retransplantation-free survival in addition to excluding HLTx (n = 10), assessed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier.
RESULTS
RESULTS
ABO-compatible patients had a median of 49 days (2-641), and ABO-identical patients had a median of 89 days (1-1717) (p = 0.048) on the transplant waiting list. Patients with a limited survival up to 1-year showed significant difference in survival rate for ABO-compatible recipients compared to ABO-identical recipients (p < 0.05), however no significant difference was shown in overall survival between the two groups (p > 0.05), with the same pattern shown in patients with a limited survival rate up to ten years, emphysema-patients, when excluding single-LTx and patients transplanted before 2005 and after 2005, respectively (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Recipients who received ABO-compatible matched grafts showed a similar survival rate to recipients who received ABO-identical matched grafts in the present study. Cytolomegalovirus and Ebstein Barr Virus mismatch were also identified as risk factors particular among emphysema patients. Since ABO-identical transplantations and ABO-compatible transplantations showed similar results, the present selection-bias of preferring ABO-identical lungs could be adjusted to increase organ allocation. It might also be possible to shorten recipient waiting list time, as an identical match showed over 80% higher time on the waiting list than a compatible, non-identical match.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30691526
doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0846-6
pii: 10.1186/s13019-019-0846-6
pmc: PMC6350378
doi:
Substances chimiques
ABO Blood-Group System
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24Références
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999 Aug;18(8):764-8
pubmed: 10512522
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999 Nov;18(11):1065-70
pubmed: 10598729
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000 Dec;19(12):1199-204
pubmed: 11124490
Transfus Med. 2001 Aug;11(4):343-51
pubmed: 11532189
Chest. 2003 Oct;124(4):1232-41
pubmed: 14555551
Am J Transplant. 2004;4 Suppl 9:13-26
pubmed: 15113352
Transplantation. 2005 Feb 15;79(3):310-6
pubmed: 15699761
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):1154-60
pubmed: 16678604
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):525-31
pubmed: 17258592
Transplant Proc. 2007 Jan-Feb;39(1):172-5
pubmed: 17275499
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Feb;27(2):184-91
pubmed: 18267225
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun;89(6):1756-64; discussion 1764-5
pubmed: 20494023
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Oct;30(10):1104-22
pubmed: 21962018
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;14(2):183-7
pubmed: 22159257
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Oct;31(10):1073-86
pubmed: 22975097
Blood. 2012 Dec 20;120(26):5224-30
pubmed: 22983446
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;95(6):1912-7; discussion 1917-8
pubmed: 23623543
Surgery. 2013 Aug;154(2):274-81
pubmed: 23830030
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Aug;33(8):822-8
pubmed: 24880825
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;98(4):1167-74
pubmed: 25106683
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Mar;99(3):762-8
pubmed: 25597790
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;23(1):65-73
pubmed: 27052747
Transplantation. 1988 Aug;46(2):246-9
pubmed: 3136561
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Jun;109(6):1075-9; discussion 1079-80
pubmed: 7776671
Transplantation. 1993 Aug;56(2):466-7
pubmed: 8356604
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996 Aug;15(8):850-1
pubmed: 8878768
Transplantation. 1998 Jan 27;65(2):261-4
pubmed: 9458026