Profiling of patient-specific myocytes identifies altered gene expression in the ophthalmoplegic subphenotype of myasthenia gravis.
Adolescent
Adult
Cells, Cultured
Female
Fibroblasts
/ metabolism
Gene Expression Regulation
Humans
Male
Muscle Cells
/ metabolism
Myasthenia Gravis, Autoimmune, Experimental
/ metabolism
Ophthalmoplegia
/ metabolism
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Receptors, Nicotinic
/ metabolism
Skin
/ cytology
Exome Sequencing
Young Adult
Gene expression
Myasthenia gravis
Myotranscriptome
Ophthalmoplegia
Subphenotype
Transdifferentiation
Journal
Orphanet journal of rare diseases
ISSN: 1750-1172
Titre abrégé: Orphanet J Rare Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101266602
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 01 2019
29 01 2019
Historique:
received:
20
04
2018
accepted:
21
01
2019
entrez:
31
1
2019
pubmed:
31
1
2019
medline:
20
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While extraocular muscles are affected early in myasthenia gravis (MG), but respond to treatment, we observe a high incidence of treatment-resistant ophthalmoplegia (OP-MG) among MG subjects with African genetic ancestry. Previously, using whole exome sequencing, we reported potentially functional variants which associated with OP-MG. The aim of this study was to profile the expression of genes harbouring the OP-MG associated variants using patient-derived subphenotype-specific 'myocyte' cultures. From well-characterised MG patients we developed the 'myocyte' culture models by transdifferentiating dermal fibroblasts using an adenovirus expressing MyoD. These myocyte cultures were treated with homologous acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenic sera to induce muscle transcripts in response to an MG stimulus. Gene expression in myocytes derived from OP-MG (n = 10) and control MG subjects (MG without ophthalmoplegia; n = 6) was quantified using a custom qPCR array profiling 93 potentially relevant genes which included the putative OP-MG susceptibility genes and other previously reported genes of interest in MG and experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis (EAMG). OP-MG myocytes compared to control MG myocytes showed altered expression of four OP-MG susceptibility genes (PPP6R2, CANX, FAM136A and FAM69A) as well as several MG and EAMG genes (p < 0.05). A correlation matrix of gene pair expression levels revealed that 15% of gene pairs were strongly correlated in OP-MG samples (r > 0.78, p < 0.01), but not in control MG samples. OP-MG susceptibility genes and MG-associated genes accounted for the top three significantly correlated gene pairs (r ≥ 0.98, p < 1 × 10 Using a surrogate cell culture model our findings suggest that muscle gene expression and co-expression differ between OP-MG and control MG individuals. These findings implicate pathways not previously considered in extraocular muscle involvement in myasthenia gravis and will inform future studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
While extraocular muscles are affected early in myasthenia gravis (MG), but respond to treatment, we observe a high incidence of treatment-resistant ophthalmoplegia (OP-MG) among MG subjects with African genetic ancestry. Previously, using whole exome sequencing, we reported potentially functional variants which associated with OP-MG. The aim of this study was to profile the expression of genes harbouring the OP-MG associated variants using patient-derived subphenotype-specific 'myocyte' cultures.
METHODS
From well-characterised MG patients we developed the 'myocyte' culture models by transdifferentiating dermal fibroblasts using an adenovirus expressing MyoD. These myocyte cultures were treated with homologous acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenic sera to induce muscle transcripts in response to an MG stimulus. Gene expression in myocytes derived from OP-MG (n = 10) and control MG subjects (MG without ophthalmoplegia; n = 6) was quantified using a custom qPCR array profiling 93 potentially relevant genes which included the putative OP-MG susceptibility genes and other previously reported genes of interest in MG and experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis (EAMG).
RESULTS
OP-MG myocytes compared to control MG myocytes showed altered expression of four OP-MG susceptibility genes (PPP6R2, CANX, FAM136A and FAM69A) as well as several MG and EAMG genes (p < 0.05). A correlation matrix of gene pair expression levels revealed that 15% of gene pairs were strongly correlated in OP-MG samples (r > 0.78, p < 0.01), but not in control MG samples. OP-MG susceptibility genes and MG-associated genes accounted for the top three significantly correlated gene pairs (r ≥ 0.98, p < 1 × 10
CONCLUSION
Using a surrogate cell culture model our findings suggest that muscle gene expression and co-expression differ between OP-MG and control MG individuals. These findings implicate pathways not previously considered in extraocular muscle involvement in myasthenia gravis and will inform future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30696470
doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1003-y
pii: 10.1186/s13023-019-1003-y
pmc: PMC6352355
doi:
Substances chimiques
CHRNA1 protein, human
0
Receptors, Nicotinic
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24Subventions
Organisme : National Research Foundation
ID : 113416
Pays : International
Organisme : AFM-Téléthon
ID : 20049
Pays : International
Références
Front Physiol. 2016 Nov 10;7:524
pubmed: 27891095
BMC Mol Biol. 2009 Jul 02;10:66
pubmed: 19573231
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1132:220-4
pubmed: 18567871
Genes Immun. 2010 Jan;11(1):1-10
pubmed: 19675582
Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Nov 25;21(23):5463-7
pubmed: 8265363
Physiol Genomics. 2005 Aug 11;22(3):283-91
pubmed: 15855387
Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8
pubmed: 18546601
Neuromuscul Disord. 2017 Sep;27(9):816-825
pubmed: 28673556
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jun 10;55(7):4348-59
pubmed: 24917137
Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Dec 15;17(24):4022-35
pubmed: 18806275
Genes Cells. 2004 Sep;9(9):801-9
pubmed: 15330857
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jan;1412(1):113-128
pubmed: 29266249
J Neurochem. 2011 Mar;116(5):926-35
pubmed: 21214571
Muscle Nerve. 2015 Apr;51(4):533-7
pubmed: 25060190
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 29;106(52):22405-10
pubmed: 20018737
Clin Chem. 2009 Apr;55(4):611-22
pubmed: 19246619
Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034
pubmed: 12184808
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Oct;58(4):542-549
pubmed: 29790193
S Afr Med J. 2012 May 23;102(6):532-6
pubmed: 22668957
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 1;24(13):i390-8
pubmed: 18586739
Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 15;21(24):4348-55
pubmed: 16234317
PLoS Curr. 2014 Mar 06;6:
pubmed: 24634799
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 Apr;1778(4):917-30
pubmed: 18023270
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jan;1412(1):14-20
pubmed: 28984362
J Neuroophthalmol. 2017 Dec;37(4):414-417
pubmed: 28742638
J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr;61(4):307-16
pubmed: 26632886
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012 Feb 01;4(2):
pubmed: 22300977
J Clin Invest. 1994 Jul;94(1):16-24
pubmed: 8040257
Curr Eye Res. 2001 Aug;23(2):86-92
pubmed: 11840345
Biotechnol Lett. 2004 Mar;26(6):509-15
pubmed: 15127793
Mol Aspects Med. 2006 Apr-Jun;27(2-3):126-39
pubmed: 16469371
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015 Jan 15;3:1
pubmed: 25627031