Long-term outcome after coronary endarterectomy adjunct to coronary artery bypass grafting.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Bypass
/ methods
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnosis
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Endarterectomy
/ methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Survival Rate
/ trends
Sweden
/ epidemiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Coronary artery bypass grafting
Coronary endarterectomy
Reintervention
Survival
Journal
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
ISSN: 1569-9285
Titre abrégé: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101158399
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2019
01 07 2019
Historique:
received:
09
07
2018
revised:
22
10
2018
accepted:
25
11
2018
pubmed:
31
1
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
31
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Coronary endarterectomy (CE) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is occasionally required to achieve revascularization in diffusely diseased vessels. Its beneficial effect has been questioned because of an increased risk of perioperative mortality and morbidity; however, its influence on the long-term outcome remains uncertain. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of adjunct CE on the incidence of a first postoperative angiogram and the need for repeat intervention and on late deaths after CABG. Two propensity-matched cohorts of patients undergoing CABG with CE (537 patients) and without adjunct CE (no CE) (537 patients) in Sweden over the period 2000-2015 were used to compare long-term outcomes. Mortality rates, postoperative incidence of coronary angiography and the need for reintervention were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean follow-up time (standard deviation) was 9.9 (4.6) years for CE and 10.0 (4.6) years for no CE. Overall survival, clinically driven angiography and coronary reintervention during follow-up (95% confidence interval) at 10 years were 65.8% (60.8-70.3), 28.2% (23.8-34.3) and 11.6% (8.7-15.3), respectively, for CE and 70.7% (65.9-74.9), 21.7% (17.8-26.3) and 12.7% (9.7-16.6), respectively, for no CE. There was a significant difference in the use of postoperative angiography between the 2 groups (P = 0.02). Although patients are subjected to an increased risk of repeat angiography, CE seems to be an acceptable treatment alternative in patients who have diffuse coronary artery disease that cannot be treated effectively by CABG alone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30698788
pii: 5303693
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy363
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22-27Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.