Effect of Adding Docetaxel to Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Rising Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels After Primary Local Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aged
Androgen Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Anilides
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Docetaxel
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Nitriles
/ administration & dosage
Progression-Free Survival
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Quality of Life
Risk
Tosyl Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Triptorelin Pamoate
/ administration & dosage
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2019
01 May 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
1
2
2019
medline:
11
2
2020
entrez:
1
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) plus docetaxel is the standard of care in hormone-naive metastatic prostate cancer but is of uncertain benefit in a nonmetastatic, high-risk prostate cancer setting. To assess the benefit of ADT plus docetaxel in patients presenting with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after primary local therapy and high-risk factors but no evidence of metastatic disease. This open-label, phase 3, randomized superiority trial comparing ADT plus docetaxel vs ADT alone enrolled patients from 28 centers in France between June 4, 2003, and September 25, 2007; final follow-up was conducted April 12, 2017, and analysis was performed May 2 to July 31, 2017. Patients had undergone primary local therapy for prostate cancer, were experiencing rising PSA levels, and were considered to be at high risk of metastatic disease. Stratification was by prior local therapy and PSA-level doubling time (≤6 vs >6 months), and intention-to-treat analysis was used. Patients were randomly assigned to receive ADT (1 year) plus docetaxel, 70 mg/m2 (every 3 weeks [6 cycles]), or ADT alone (1 year). The primary outcome was PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). Secondary end points were PSA response, radiologic PFS, overall survival, safety, and quality of life. Overall, 254 patients were randomized (1:1) to the trial; median age, 64 years in the ADT plus docetaxel arm, 66 years in the ADT alone arm. At a median follow-up of 30.0 months, the median PSA-PFS was 20.3 (95% CI, 19.0-21.6) months in the ADT plus docetaxel arm vs 19.3 (95% CI, 18.2-20.8) months in the ADT alone arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62-1.16; P = .31). At a median follow-up of 10.5 years, there was no significant between-arm difference in radiologic PFS (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74-1.43; P = .88). Overall survival data were not mature. The most common grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects in the ADT plus docetaxel arm were neutropenia (60 of 125 patients [48.0%]), febrile neutropenia (10 [8.0%]), and thrombocytopenia (4 [3.0%]). There was no significant between-arm difference in overall quality of life. Compared with ADT alone, combined ADT plus docetaxel therapy with curative intent did not significantly improve PSA-PFS in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and rising PSA levels and no evidence of metastatic disease. French Health Products Safety Agency identifier: 030591; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00764166.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30703190
pii: 2723273
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6607
pmc: PMC6512307
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Anilides
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Nitriles
0
Tosyl Compounds
0
Triptorelin Pamoate
08AN7WA2G0
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
bicalutamide
A0Z3NAU9DP
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00764166']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
623-632Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(3):378-85
pubmed: 21091976
J Urol. 2004 Mar;171(3):1141-7
pubmed: 14767288
Lancet. 2016 Mar 19;387(10024):1163-77
pubmed: 26719232
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):6992-8
pubmed: 16192586
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3352-7
pubmed: 15738531
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Mar 15;64(4):1162-7
pubmed: 16427211
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 20;28(30):4562-7
pubmed: 20855838
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):13-14
pubmed: 27812683
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017 Aug;9(8):565-573
pubmed: 28794807
Eur Urol. 2016 May;69(5):802-20
pubmed: 26691493
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):11-12
pubmed: 27812686
J Clin Oncol. 1983 Nov;1(11):710-9
pubmed: 6668489
Ann Oncol. 2007 Jun;18(6):1064-70
pubmed: 17434899
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2006 Mar;4(4):287-92
pubmed: 16729913
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):376-382
pubmed: 29261442
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1765-71
pubmed: 17470867
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):727-737
pubmed: 27155740
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):787-94
pubmed: 26028518
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 1;22(3):537-56
pubmed: 14752077
J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2221-5
pubmed: 15126789
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 1;24(34):5408-13
pubmed: 17135641
Semin Urol Oncol. 1999 Aug;17(3):130-4
pubmed: 10462315
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0157660
pubmed: 27308831
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 20;35(27):3097-3104
pubmed: 28796587
JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1591-7
pubmed: 10235151
J Urol. 2018 Nov;200(5):956-966
pubmed: 29730201
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(1):32-9
pubmed: 21777360
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1502-12
pubmed: 15470213
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):737-46
pubmed: 26244877
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Dec;29(12):778-786
pubmed: 29079227
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):243-256
pubmed: 26718929
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 20;23(12):2789-96
pubmed: 15837994
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 25;107(12):djv261
pubmed: 26409187
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1872-6
pubmed: 14532796
Cancer. 2013 Oct 15;119(20):3610-8
pubmed: 23943299
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):149-58
pubmed: 23306100