Biomarker analysis of the GATSBY study of trastuzumab emtansine versus a taxane in previously treated HER2-positive advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
/ administration & dosage
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Docetaxel
/ administration & dosage
Esophagogastric Junction
/ drug effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Polymorphism, Genetic
Prognosis
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ metabolism
Stomach Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Survival Rate
Young Adult
Biomarkers
Gastric cancer
Gastroesophageal junction
Trastuzumab emtansine
Journal
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
ISSN: 1436-3305
Titre abrégé: Gastric Cancer
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 100886238
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
12
10
2018
accepted:
26
12
2018
pubmed:
2
2
2019
medline:
31
12
2019
entrez:
2
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prespecified exploratory biomarker analyses of the phase II/III GATSBY study (NCT01641939) assessed whether patient subgroups experienced a survival benefit from trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus taxane therapy, and to advance understanding of HER2-positive advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (AGC) disease biology. Adults with HER2-positive AGC whose disease progressed during/after first-line therapy were enrolled and randomized to receive T-DM1 [Stage 1: 3.6 mg/kg q3w, 2.4 mg/kg qw, or taxane (docetaxel/paclitaxel); Stage 2: 2.4 mg/kg qw or taxane]. Primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival (OS). Prespecified exploratory biomarkers included HER2, HER3, PTEN, PIK3CA mutation status, FcγR, and cMET. Tumor samples from patients who received 2.4 mg/kg T-DM1 (n = 228) or taxane (n = 117) were included. Median OS was longer in subgroups with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ [9.5 versus 8.3 months for T-DM1 versus taxane; hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.68-1.43)] versus HER2 IHC 2+/in situ hybridization-positive [5.2 versus 9.2 months for T-DM1 versus taxane; HR 1.53 (95% CI 0.94-2.50)] tumors. Trends towards increased median OS were also observed in subgroups with > versus ≤ median HER2 mRNA expression, higher versus lower HER2 gene copy number, HER2 gene ratio and H score, and homogenous or nonfocal HER2 IHC staining. T-DM1 was not associated with superior OS versus taxane in any subgroup. Patients with previously treated HER2-positive AGC with higher HER2 expression experienced a better treatment effect from T-DM1 than those with lower HER2 expression and may derive comparable survival benefits from T-DM1 and taxane therapy. NCT01641939 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01641939 ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Prespecified exploratory biomarker analyses of the phase II/III GATSBY study (NCT01641939) assessed whether patient subgroups experienced a survival benefit from trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus taxane therapy, and to advance understanding of HER2-positive advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (AGC) disease biology.
METHODS
Adults with HER2-positive AGC whose disease progressed during/after first-line therapy were enrolled and randomized to receive T-DM1 [Stage 1: 3.6 mg/kg q3w, 2.4 mg/kg qw, or taxane (docetaxel/paclitaxel); Stage 2: 2.4 mg/kg qw or taxane]. Primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival (OS). Prespecified exploratory biomarkers included HER2, HER3, PTEN, PIK3CA mutation status, FcγR, and cMET. Tumor samples from patients who received 2.4 mg/kg T-DM1 (n = 228) or taxane (n = 117) were included.
RESULTS
Median OS was longer in subgroups with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ [9.5 versus 8.3 months for T-DM1 versus taxane; hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.68-1.43)] versus HER2 IHC 2+/in situ hybridization-positive [5.2 versus 9.2 months for T-DM1 versus taxane; HR 1.53 (95% CI 0.94-2.50)] tumors. Trends towards increased median OS were also observed in subgroups with > versus ≤ median HER2 mRNA expression, higher versus lower HER2 gene copy number, HER2 gene ratio and H score, and homogenous or nonfocal HER2 IHC staining. T-DM1 was not associated with superior OS versus taxane in any subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with previously treated HER2-positive AGC with higher HER2 expression experienced a better treatment effect from T-DM1 than those with lower HER2 expression and may derive comparable survival benefits from T-DM1 and taxane therapy.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT01641939 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01641939 ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30706247
doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-00923-7
pii: 10.1007/s10120-018-00923-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
SE2KH7T06F
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01641939']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
803-816Références
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi57-63
pubmed: 24078663
Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 1;65(23):10992-1000
pubmed: 16322248
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 13;96(8):4240-5
pubmed: 10200246
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):689-99
pubmed: 24793816
Biostatistics. 2004 Jul;5(3):465-81
pubmed: 15208206
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Jan;16(1):228-238
pubmed: 27811012
Oncotarget. 2015 Mar 10;6(7):5072-87
pubmed: 25669984
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3753-61
pubmed: 25332247
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19
pubmed: 22149875
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1783-91
pubmed: 23020162
Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97
pubmed: 20728210
Histopathology. 2008 Jun;52(7):797-805
pubmed: 18422971
Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):640-653
pubmed: 28343975
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jul;128(2):347-56
pubmed: 20730488
Oncologist. 2016 Sep;21(9):1085-90
pubmed: 27401892
Cancer Cell. 2007 Oct;12(4):395-402
pubmed: 17936563
Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Mar;11(3):660-9
pubmed: 22238368
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Jul;9(7):463-75
pubmed: 19536107
Nature. 2014 Sep 11;513(7517):202-9
pubmed: 25079317
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 10;32(29):3212-20
pubmed: 25199759
Cancer Res. 1986 Aug;46(8 Suppl):4244s-4248s
pubmed: 3524805
Cancer Res. 2008 Nov 15;68(22):9280-90
pubmed: 19010901
Gastric Cancer. 2019 May;22(3):527-535
pubmed: 30386954
Cancer Res. 2008 Mar 1;68(5):1471-7
pubmed: 18316611
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 22;100(15):8933-8
pubmed: 12853564
Chin J Cancer Res. 2015 Apr;27(2):163-71
pubmed: 25937778
Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jul;18(3):476-84
pubmed: 25038874
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 1;22(15):3755-63
pubmed: 26920887
Mod Pathol. 2012 May;25(5):637-50
pubmed: 22222640
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 1;32(19):2039-49
pubmed: 24868024
Cancer Res. 2008 Nov 15;68(22):9221-30
pubmed: 19010894
Cancer Cell. 2004 Aug;6(2):117-27
pubmed: 15324695
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1437-44
pubmed: 24733796