Effect of cyclosporine A versus tacrolimus on the response to antiviral therapy after hepatitis C genotype-4 recurrence post-liver transplantation: A prospective cohort trial.
Adult
Aged
Antiviral Agents
/ therapeutic use
Calcineurin Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Cyclosporine
/ therapeutic use
Drug Interactions
/ physiology
Drug Therapy, Combination
/ methods
Female
Genotype
Hepacivirus
/ drug effects
Hepatitis C, Chronic
/ drug therapy
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Interferon-alpha
/ therapeutic use
Liver Transplantation
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Polyethylene Glycols
/ therapeutic use
Prospective Studies
Recombinant Proteins
/ therapeutic use
Recurrence
Ribavirin
/ therapeutic use
Sofosbuvir
/ therapeutic use
Tacrolimus
/ therapeutic use
Young Adult
antiviral therapy
calcineurin inhibitors
hepatitis C genotype-4
liver transplantation
sustained virological response
Journal
Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics
ISSN: 1365-2710
Titre abrégé: J Clin Pharm Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704308
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
15
09
2018
revised:
07
12
2018
accepted:
08
01
2019
pubmed:
5
2
2019
medline:
20
8
2019
entrez:
5
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The influence of immunosuppression on the response to antiviral therapy (AVT) for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients remains controversial, especially for the rarely investigated genotype 4. This study aims to compare the effects of the two widely used calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac)) on the therapeutic response to different AVT regimens. A prospective, dual-centre, cohort study of 126 Egyptian living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients with recurrent HCV genotype 4 infection, who were categorized into three groups according to the AVT used. Group I received pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN-α 2a) plus ribavirin (RBV) (n = 44), group II received the direct antiviral agent (DAA) sofosbuvir plus RBV (n = 52) and group III received daclatasvir and sofosbuvir (also DAAs) plus RBV (n = 30). Each group was further subdivided according to the primary immunosuppression (CsA or Tac). The sustained virological response (SVR) and relapse rates were considered the primary therapeutic outcomes of AVT. No significant intergroup differences were observed in the achievement of primary and secondary outcomes. SVR rates in the IFN-based regimen were 75% and 66.7% in CsA and Tac users and 81.2% and 83% in DAAs, respectively. Relapse rates in the IFN-based regimen were 10% and 16.7% in CsA and Tac users and 12.5% and 14.9% in DAAs, respectively. Within the limitations of a relatively small study, CsA did not offer an advantage over Tac regarding the response to AVT after HCV genotype 4 recurrence in LDLT recipients.
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
Calcineurin Inhibitors
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Interferon-alpha
0
Recombinant Proteins
0
Polyethylene Glycols
3WJQ0SDW1A
Ribavirin
49717AWG6K
Cyclosporine
83HN0GTJ6D
peginterferon alfa-2a
Q46947FE7K
Sofosbuvir
WJ6CA3ZU8B
Tacrolimus
WM0HAQ4WNM
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Pagination
447-453Informations de copyright
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.