Genomic alterations in breast cancer: level of evidence for actionability according to ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT).
BRCA1 Protein
/ genetics
BRCA2 Protein
/ genetics
Breast Neoplasms
/ genetics
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
/ genetics
Female
Genome, Human
/ genetics
Genomic Instability
/ genetics
Humans
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Mutation
/ genetics
Neoplasm Staging
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
/ genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
/ genetics
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ genetics
breast cancer
genomic alterations
precision medicine
target prioritization
targeted therapies
Journal
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2019
01 03 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
5
2
2019
medline:
25
3
2020
entrez:
5
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Better knowledge of the tumor genomic landscapes has helped to develop more effective targeted drugs. However, there is no tool to interpret targetability of genomic alterations assessed by next-generation sequencing in the context of clinical practice. Our aim is to rank the level of evidence of individual recurrent genomic alterations observed in breast cancer based on the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) in order to help the clinicians to prioritize treatment. Analyses of databases suggested that there are around 40 recurrent driver alterations in breast cancer. ERBB2 amplification, germline BRCA1/2 mutations, PIK3CA mutations were classified tier of evidence IA based on large randomized trials showing antitumor activity of targeted therapies in patients presenting the alterations. NTRK fusions and microsatellite instability (MSI) were ranked IC. ESR1 mutations and PTEN loss were ranked tier IIA, and ERBB2 mutations and AKT1 mutations tier IIB. Somatic BRCA 1/2 mutations, MDM2 amplifications and ERBB 3 mutations were ranked tier III. Seventeen genes were ranked tier IV based on preclinical evidence. Finally, FGFR1 and CCND1 were ranked tier X alterations because previous studies have shown lack of actionability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30715161
pii: S0923-7534(19)31092-0
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz036
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
BRCA1 Protein
0
BRCA1 protein, human
0
BRCA2 Protein
0
BRCA2 protein, human
0
MDM2 protein, human
EC 2.3.2.27
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
EC 2.3.2.27
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
EC 2.7.1.137
PIK3CA protein, human
EC 2.7.1.137
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
AKT1 protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
EC 2.7.11.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
365-373Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.