Effect of an interactive voice response system on self-management in kidney transplant recipients: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
entrez:
9
2
2019
pubmed:
9
2
2019
medline:
21
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Adherence to a complex and ongoing set of therapeutic recommendations significantly determines short and long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT). Interactive voice response system (IVRS) is a novel phone-based platform which is potentially useful to deliver health behavior interventions. The aims of the study is to describe the development of a theory-driven and educational IVRS investigate the effect of an IVRS on the self-management outcomes in KT recipients as compared with the control group. This study has been designed as a randomized, 2 parallel groups controlled trial. The KT recipients' older than18 years of age with access to a cellphone will be included. A total of 120 patients will be randomly assigned to the control and intervention groups. The participants in the intervention group will receive completely automatic calls in 3 categories: educational, medication adherence, and reminders by the IVRS, whereas those in the control group will receive usual care. The follow up will be performed within 6 months. The primary outcome will be the medication adherence while patients' transplant knowledge, health-related quality of life, and rehospitalization rates will be considered as secondary outcomes. Thus far, recruitment of participants has not been completed and results will be published in 2019. The IVRS is potentially useful to help KT recipients improve the self-management outcomes. The hypothesis is using an IVRS intervention makes a significant difference between basel assessment of adherence to immunosuppressive medications scale, 12-item short form survey, second version, kidney transplant understanding tool baseline scores, and those obtained at the end of study. This trial is registered with the Iran Trial Registrar under registration number IRCT20180124038492N1 and registration date 30 January 2018. https://irct.ir/trial/29215.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30732143
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014291
pii: 00005792-201902080-00024
pmc: PMC6380874
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14291Références
Gordon EJ, Prohaska T, Siminoff LA, et al. Can focusing on self-care reduce disparities in kidney transplantation outcomes? Am J Kidney Dis 2005;45:935–40.
Jamieson NJ, Hanson CS, Josephson MA, et al. Motivations, challenges, and attitudes to self-management in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Am J Kidney Dis 2016;67:461–78.
Low JK, Williams A, Manias E, et al. Interventions to improve medication adherence in adult kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;30:752–61.
Pinsky B, Takemoto SK, Lentine KL, et al. Transplant outcomes and economic costs associated with patient noncompliance to immunosuppression. Am J Transplant 2009;9:2597–606.
Andersson C. Comparison of WEB and interactive voice response (IVR) methods for delivering brief alcohol interventions to hazardous-drinking university students: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Addict Res 2015;21:240–52.
Taber DJ, et al. The Impact of Health Care Appointment Non-Adherence on Graft Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation. Am J Nephrol 2017;45:91–8.
Moller AC, Merchant G, Conroy DE, et al. Applying and advancing behavior change theories and techniques in the context of a digital health revolution: proposals for more effectively realizing untapped potential. J Behav Med 2017;40:85–98.
Dallery J, Kurti A, Erb P. A new frontier: integrating behavioral and digital technology to promote health behavior. Behav Anal 2015;38:19–49.
Bain-Brickley D, Butler LM, Kennedy GE, et al. Interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in children with HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;12:CD009513.
Balke W-T, Handels H, Kalet IJ, et al. Discussion of spatial-symbolic query engine in anatomy’. Methods Inf Med 2012;51:479–88.
van Velthoven MH, Car J, Zhang Y, et al. mHealth series: New ideas for mHealth data collection implementation in low- and middle-income countries. J Glob Health 2013;3:020101doi: 10.7189/jogh.03.020101.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.03.020101
Yousef AM, Chatti MA, Schroeder U, et al. The state of MOOCs from 2008 to 2014: A critical analysis and future visions. InInternational conference on computer supported education 2014 Apr 1 (pp. 305–327). Springer, Cham.
Cho YM, Lee S, Islam SMS, et al. Theories applied to m-health interventions for behavior change in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2018;24:727–41.
Cormick G, Kim NA, Rodgers A, et al. Interest of pregnant women in the use of SMS (short message service) text messages for the improvement of perinatal and postnatal care. Reprod Health 2012;9:9.
Dew MA, Roth LH, Thompson ME, et al. Medical compliance and its predictors in the first year after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 1996;15:631–45.
Kraft MR, Androwich I. Interactive voice response technology: a tool for improving healthcare. InNI 2012: Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics 2012 (Vol. 2012). American Medical Informatics Association.
Sondaal SF, Browne JL, Amoakoh-Coleman M, et al. Assessing the effect of mHealth interventions in improving maternal and neonatal care in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PloS One 2016;11:e0154664.
Piette JD, Striplin D, Marinec N, et al. A randomized trial of mobile health support for heart failure patients and their informal caregivers: impacts on caregiver-reported outcomes. Med Care 2015;53:692.
Tsoli S, Sutton S, Kassavou A. Interactive voice response interventions targeting behaviour change: a systematic literature review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. BMJ Open 2018;8:e018974.
Butler JA, Roderick P, Mullee M, et al. Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation 2004;77:769–76.
Posadzki P, Mastellos N, Ryan R, et al. Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions. Cochrane Library 2016.
Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Cooper PS, et al. Interventions to improve medication adherence among older adults: meta-analysis of adherence outcomes among randomized controlled trials. Gerontologist 2009;49:447–62.
Graves MM, Roberts MC, Rapoff M, et al. The efficacy of adherence interventions for chronically ill children: a meta-analytic review. J Pediatr Psychol 2009;35:368–82.
Ross SM. Role for automated communication strategies in medication adherence management. Am Health Drug Benefits 2008;1:20.
Williams A, Manias E, Walker R. Interventions to improve medication adherence in people with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2008;63:132–43.
Osborne RH, Spinks JM, Wicks IP. Patient education and self-management programs in arthritis. Med J Aust 2004;180:S23.
Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, Whitfield K. The health education impact questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns 2007;66:192–201.
Ceniceros X. Testing the Effects of the E-Health Amputee Patient Empowerment Program (EAPEP) (Doctoral dissertation).
Rosaasen N, Taylor J, Blackburn D, et al. Development and Validation of the Kidney Transplant Understanding Tool (K-TUT). Transplant Direct 2017;3:
Urstad KH, Wahl AK, Andersen MH, et al. Limited evidence for the effectiveness of educational interventions for renal transplant recipients. Results from a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Patient Educ Couns 2013;90:147–54.
de Oliveira Marsicano E, da Silva Fernandes N, Colugnati F, et al. Transcultural adaptation and initial validation of Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Basel assessment of adherence to immunosuppressive medications scale (BAASIS) in kidney transplants. BMC Nephrol 2013;14:108.
Chisholm MA, Lance CE, Williamson GM, et al. Development and validation of an immunosuppressant therapy adherence barrier instrument. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;20:181–8.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:834–40.
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7.
Garcia MFFM, Bravin AM, Garcia PD, et al. Behavioral measures to reduce non-adherence in renal transplant recipients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int Urol Nephrol 2015;47:1899–905.
Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ, et al. The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2): a population-based validation study from Tehran, Iran. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:12.
Bender BG, Apter A, Bogen DK, et al. Test of an interactive voice response intervention to improve adherence to controller medications in adults with asthma. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:159–65.
Calder LA, Cwinn AA, Gatien M, et al. The feasibility of an interactive voice response system (IVRS) for monitoring patient safety after discharge from the ED. Emerg Med J 2017;35:180–5.
Castle T, Cunningham MA, Marsh GM. Antidepressant medication adherence via interactive voice response telephone calls. Am J Manag Care 2012;18:e346–55.
Heapy AA, Higgins DM, Goulet JL, et al. Interactive voice response-based self-management for chronic back pain: the COPES noninferiority randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:765–73.
Hettema JE, Hosseinbor S, Ingersoll KS. Feasibility and reliability of interactive voice response assessment of HIV medication adherence: research and clinical implications. HIV Clin Trials 2012;13:271–7.
Kassavou A, Sutton S. Reasons for non-adherence to cardiometabolic medications, and acceptability of an interactive voice response intervention in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes in primary care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015597.
Skolarus LE, Piette JD, Pfeiffer PN, et al. Interactive voice response-an innovative approach to post-stroke depression self-management support. Transl Stroke Res 2017;8:77–82.
Cizmic A, Heilmann RM, Milchak JL, et al. Impact of interactive voice response technology on primary adherence to bisphosphonate therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 2015;26:2131–6.
Derose SF, Green K, Marrett E, et al. Automated outreach to increase primary adherence to cholesterol-lowering medications. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:38–43.
Migneault JP, Dedier JJ, Wright JA, et al. A culturally adapted telecommunication system to improve physical activity, diet quality, and medication adherence among hypertensive African–Americans: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med 2012;43:62–73.
Vollmer WM, Feldstein A, Smith DH, et al. Use of health information technology to improve medication adherence. Am J Manag Care 2011;17:S79.
Tsoli S, Sutton S, Kassavou A. Interactive voice response interventions targeting behaviour change: a systematic literature review: Stergiani Tsoli. European Journal of Public Health 2018;28(suppl_4):cky213-167.