Milk handling practices and consumption behavior among Borana pastoralists in southern Ethiopia.
Disease perception
Milk boiling
Milk consumption
Milk container smoking
Milk hygiene
Safe milk
Journal
Journal of health, population, and nutrition
ISSN: 2072-1315
Titre abrégé: J Health Popul Nutr
Pays: Bangladesh
ID NLM: 100959228
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 02 2019
07 02 2019
Historique:
received:
07
09
2018
accepted:
27
01
2019
entrez:
9
2
2019
pubmed:
9
2
2019
medline:
24
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Safety and wholesomeness of milk intended for human consumption are influenced by various interlinked factors. However, information on what these factors are, especially in the pastoral traditional communities of Ethiopia, is largely lacking. The objective of this study is to assess the hygienic milk production, processing and consumption practices, and behaviors of Borana pastoralists. The study used qualitative participatory research methods. Individual semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, informal discussions, and observations were carried out on (1) milk handling practices, (2) perceptions of quality and safety of milk, including perceived criteria for good milk, (3) awareness of milk-borne diseases, and (4) perception towards milk boiling practices. The interviews and discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by identifying themes. Some risky behaviors related to milk handling and consumption were identified. These include unhygienic conditions in handling milk and milk products, consumption behaviors such as consuming raw milk purchased from markets, and children directly consuming milk from the udder of animals (e.g., goats). There was a very strong reluctance to boil milk before consumption mainly because of the misconception that nutrients in the milk are destroyed when milk is boiled and "boiled milk is dead". On the other hand, potential risk mitigation practices were identified such as smoking of milk containers (which may help reduce microbial growth), processing milk through fermentation, consuming milk in boiled tea, and a recent trend towards boiling milk for babies. However, the latter was not motivated by concern over microbial hazards but the belief that raw milk could form curds in children's stomach which might then suffocate them. The findings highlight the need to promote hygienic handling practices of milk and closely engage with local communities to improve their understanding of milk safety to facilitate change in practices. Educating pastoralists on good milk production practices should be given priority. One of the ways to do this could be by strengthening the integration of milk hygiene in research and development programs as an entry point for behavioral change towards the safe handling and consumption of milk and milk products.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Safety and wholesomeness of milk intended for human consumption are influenced by various interlinked factors. However, information on what these factors are, especially in the pastoral traditional communities of Ethiopia, is largely lacking. The objective of this study is to assess the hygienic milk production, processing and consumption practices, and behaviors of Borana pastoralists.
METHODS
The study used qualitative participatory research methods. Individual semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, informal discussions, and observations were carried out on (1) milk handling practices, (2) perceptions of quality and safety of milk, including perceived criteria for good milk, (3) awareness of milk-borne diseases, and (4) perception towards milk boiling practices. The interviews and discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by identifying themes.
RESULTS
Some risky behaviors related to milk handling and consumption were identified. These include unhygienic conditions in handling milk and milk products, consumption behaviors such as consuming raw milk purchased from markets, and children directly consuming milk from the udder of animals (e.g., goats). There was a very strong reluctance to boil milk before consumption mainly because of the misconception that nutrients in the milk are destroyed when milk is boiled and "boiled milk is dead". On the other hand, potential risk mitigation practices were identified such as smoking of milk containers (which may help reduce microbial growth), processing milk through fermentation, consuming milk in boiled tea, and a recent trend towards boiling milk for babies. However, the latter was not motivated by concern over microbial hazards but the belief that raw milk could form curds in children's stomach which might then suffocate them.
CONCLUSION
The findings highlight the need to promote hygienic handling practices of milk and closely engage with local communities to improve their understanding of milk safety to facilitate change in practices. Educating pastoralists on good milk production practices should be given priority. One of the ways to do this could be by strengthening the integration of milk hygiene in research and development programs as an entry point for behavioral change towards the safe handling and consumption of milk and milk products.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30732649
doi: 10.1186/s41043-019-0163-7
pii: 10.1186/s41043-019-0163-7
pmc: PMC6367795
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6Références
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 May;80(5):824-6
pubmed: 19407131
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017 Mar;49(3):445-450
pubmed: 27988853
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Dec 2;151(2):223-8
pubmed: 21944662
Germs. 2012 Sep 01;2(3):101-9
pubmed: 24432270
Zoonoses Public Health. 2012 Mar;59(2):118-25
pubmed: 21824377
Trop Med Int Health. 2004 Oct;9(10):1132-8
pubmed: 15482408
BMC Vet Res. 2017 Oct 23;13(1):303
pubmed: 29058605
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Feb;17(4):513-6
pubmed: 23467951
Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Feb 1;153(1-2):135-41
pubmed: 22104122
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010 Mar;42(3):357-62
pubmed: 19728137
Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 May 30;139 Suppl 1:S3-15
pubmed: 20153070
J Infect Dis. 2001 Apr 1;183(7):1063-70
pubmed: 11237831
Front Microbiol. 2011 Sep 27;2:200
pubmed: 21991264
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jan 15;32(2):263-9
pubmed: 11170916
Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Aug 15;103(1):11-21
pubmed: 16081180
J Food Prot. 2013 Nov;76(11):1908-15
pubmed: 24215695
Meat Sci. 2014 Jun;97(2):197-206
pubmed: 24583328
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2006 Apr;38(3):185-94
pubmed: 16986766
J Food Prot. 2014 Feb;77(2):299-307
pubmed: 24490925
Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 23;8:1612
pubmed: 28878759
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2016 Feb;49(1):4-10
pubmed: 26689277
Int J Food Microbiol. 2001 Sep 1;68(3):173-86
pubmed: 11529440
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Mar 15;50(6):882-9
pubmed: 20158401
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 1;48(1):93-100
pubmed: 19053805
J Infect Dis. 2005 Mar 1;191(5):809-14
pubmed: 15688300
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Aug 27;12(9):10490-507
pubmed: 26343693
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2005 Summer;2(2):115-29
pubmed: 15992306
Int Arch Med. 2013 Jul 17;6:29
pubmed: 23866682
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2009 Sep;6(7):793-806
pubmed: 19737059
Epidemiol Infect. 2012 May;140(5):887-96
pubmed: 21791149
Am J Med Sci. 2010 Sep;340(3):238-46
pubmed: 20823701
Risk Anal. 2005 Jun;25(3):503-17
pubmed: 16022686
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011 Apr;8(4):465-87
pubmed: 21117940