The early identification of disease progression in patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department: a multi-centre derivation and validation study.
Adolescent
Adrenomedullin
/ analysis
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Area Under Curve
Biomarkers
/ analysis
C-Reactive Protein
/ analysis
Disease Progression
Early Diagnosis
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ organization & administration
England
Female
France
Humans
Infections
/ diagnosis
Italy
Lactic Acid
/ analysis
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Organ Dysfunction Scores
Peptide Fragments
/ analysis
Proportional Hazards Models
Protein Precursors
/ analysis
Spain
Statistics, Nonparametric
Sweden
Switzerland
Validation Studies as Topic
Disease progression
Emergency department
MR-proADM
SOFA
Sepsis
qSOFA
Journal
Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Feb 2019
08 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
20
07
2018
accepted:
18
01
2019
entrez:
10
2
2019
pubmed:
10
2
2019
medline:
1
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a lack of validated tools to assess potential disease progression and hospitalisation decisions in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected infection. This study aimed to identify suitable blood biomarkers (MR-proADM, PCT, lactate and CRP) or clinical scores (SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, NEWS and CRB-65) to fulfil this unmet clinical need. An observational derivation patient cohort validated by an independent secondary analysis across nine EDs. Logistic and Cox regression, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess performance. Disease progression was identified using a composite endpoint of 28-day mortality, ICU admission and hospitalisation > 10 days. One thousand one hundred seventy-five derivation and 896 validation patients were analysed with respective 28-day mortality rates of 7.1% and 5.0%, and hospitalisation rates of 77.9% and 76.2%. MR-proADM showed greatest accuracy in predicting 28-day mortality and hospitalisation requirement across both cohorts. Patient subgroups with high MR-proADM concentrations (≥ 1.54 nmol/L) and low biomarker (PCT < 0.25 ng/mL, lactate < 2.0 mmol/L or CRP < 67 mg/L) or clinical score (SOFA < 2 points, qSOFA < 2 points, NEWS < 4 points or CRB-65 < 2 points) values were characterised by a significantly longer length of hospitalisation (p < 0.001), rate of ICU admission (p < 0.001), elevated mortality risk (e.g. SOFA, qSOFA and NEWS HR [95%CI], 45.5 [10.0-207.6], 23.4 [11.1-49.3] and 32.6 [9.4-113.6], respectively) and a greater number of disease progression events (p < 0.001), compared to similar subgroups with low MR-proADM concentrations (< 1.54 nmol/L). Increased out-patient treatment across both cohorts could be facilitated using a derivation-derived MR-proADM cut-off of < 0.87 nmol/L (15.0% and 16.6%), with decreased readmission rates and no mortalities. In patients presenting to the ED with a suspected infection, the blood biomarker MR-proADM could most accurately identify the likelihood of further disease progression. Incorporation into an early sepsis management protocol may therefore aid rapid decision-making in order to either initiate, escalate or intensify early treatment strategies, or identify patients suitable for safe out-patient treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is a lack of validated tools to assess potential disease progression and hospitalisation decisions in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected infection. This study aimed to identify suitable blood biomarkers (MR-proADM, PCT, lactate and CRP) or clinical scores (SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, NEWS and CRB-65) to fulfil this unmet clinical need.
METHODS
METHODS
An observational derivation patient cohort validated by an independent secondary analysis across nine EDs. Logistic and Cox regression, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess performance. Disease progression was identified using a composite endpoint of 28-day mortality, ICU admission and hospitalisation > 10 days.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One thousand one hundred seventy-five derivation and 896 validation patients were analysed with respective 28-day mortality rates of 7.1% and 5.0%, and hospitalisation rates of 77.9% and 76.2%. MR-proADM showed greatest accuracy in predicting 28-day mortality and hospitalisation requirement across both cohorts. Patient subgroups with high MR-proADM concentrations (≥ 1.54 nmol/L) and low biomarker (PCT < 0.25 ng/mL, lactate < 2.0 mmol/L or CRP < 67 mg/L) or clinical score (SOFA < 2 points, qSOFA < 2 points, NEWS < 4 points or CRB-65 < 2 points) values were characterised by a significantly longer length of hospitalisation (p < 0.001), rate of ICU admission (p < 0.001), elevated mortality risk (e.g. SOFA, qSOFA and NEWS HR [95%CI], 45.5 [10.0-207.6], 23.4 [11.1-49.3] and 32.6 [9.4-113.6], respectively) and a greater number of disease progression events (p < 0.001), compared to similar subgroups with low MR-proADM concentrations (< 1.54 nmol/L). Increased out-patient treatment across both cohorts could be facilitated using a derivation-derived MR-proADM cut-off of < 0.87 nmol/L (15.0% and 16.6%), with decreased readmission rates and no mortalities.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In patients presenting to the ED with a suspected infection, the blood biomarker MR-proADM could most accurately identify the likelihood of further disease progression. Incorporation into an early sepsis management protocol may therefore aid rapid decision-making in order to either initiate, escalate or intensify early treatment strategies, or identify patients suitable for safe out-patient treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30736862
doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2329-5
pii: 10.1186/s13054-019-2329-5
pmc: PMC6368690
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Peptide Fragments
0
Protein Precursors
0
mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, human
0
Adrenomedullin
148498-78-6
Lactic Acid
33X04XA5AT
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
40Subventions
Organisme : Thermo Fisher (Germany)
ID : N/A
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Clin Intensive Care. 1994;5(4):186-90
pubmed: 10150545
N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 31;293(5):257
pubmed: 1143310
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1250-6
pubmed: 12682500
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1589-96
pubmed: 16625125
Thromb Haemost. 2007 Nov;98(5):944-51
pubmed: 18000597
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):518-22
pubmed: 18080111
Chest. 2009 Sep;136(3):823-831
pubmed: 19363212
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Apr 07;11:41
pubmed: 21473747
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 May 03;11:112
pubmed: 21539743
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Jul 30;141:w13237
pubmed: 21805408
Chest. 2012 Dec;142(6):1447-1454
pubmed: 22661450
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Aug 08;12:184
pubmed: 22874067
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):215-21
pubmed: 23000327
Int J Cardiol. 2012 Nov 29;161(3):166-73
pubmed: 23017815
Eur Respir J. 2013 Oct;42(4):1064-75
pubmed: 23349444
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 21;369(21):2063
pubmed: 24256390
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Oct;20(10):1048-54
pubmed: 25039648
Respir Med. 2014 Nov;108(11):1569-80
pubmed: 25448309
J Infect. 2015 May;70(5):457-66
pubmed: 25499199
Clin Chem. 2015 Dec;61(12):1446-52
pubmed: 26510957
Crit Care. 2015 Oct 29;19:377
pubmed: 26511878
Shock. 2016 Mar;45(3):259-70
pubmed: 26871664
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74
pubmed: 26903335
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1117-8
pubmed: 26927525
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911
pubmed: 27649072
Crit Care. 2016 Nov 9;20(1):363
pubmed: 27825364
Chest. 2017 Mar;151(3):586-596
pubmed: 27876592
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):15
pubmed: 28185230
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):290-298
pubmed: 28221298
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Feb;5(3):55
pubmed: 28251134
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1602-1612
pubmed: 28466151
Med Clin (Barc). 2017 Sep 8;149(5):209-210
pubmed: 28545952
Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):1596-1606
pubmed: 28671898
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 18;18(8):null
pubmed: 28820494
Chest. 2018 Jan;153(1):34-38
pubmed: 29037526
J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:148
pubmed: 29121586
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2019 Jan;37(1):11-18
pubmed: 29289378
J Leukoc Biol. 2018 Apr;103(4):749-759
pubmed: 29360169
Crit Care. 2018 Mar 21;22(1):79
pubmed: 29562917
J Infect. 2018 Jul;77(1):18-24
pubmed: 29807091
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Dec;24(12):1282-1289
pubmed: 29870855
Crit Care. 2018 Jun 5;22(1):147
pubmed: 29871660
Crit Care. 2018 Aug 20;22(1):201
pubmed: 30122149
Intensive Care Med. 1995 Jul;21(7):602-5
pubmed: 7593905
Lancet. 1993 Feb 27;341(8844):515-8
pubmed: 8094770