Luring the Motor System: Impact of Performance-Contingent Incentives on Pre-Movement Beta-Band Activity and Motor Performance.
beta-band
electroencephalography
expected value
motivational salience
motor preparation
reaching
Journal
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
ISSN: 1529-2401
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8102140
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 04 2019
10 04 2019
Historique:
received:
18
07
2018
revised:
31
01
2019
accepted:
01
02
2019
pubmed:
10
2
2019
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
10
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It has been shown that when incentives are provided during movement preparation, activity in parieto-frontal regions reflects both expected value and motivational salience. Yet behavioral work suggests that the processing of rewards is faster than for punishments, raising the possibility that expected value and motivational salience manifest at different latencies during movement planning. Given the role of beta oscillations (13-30 Hz) in movement preparation and in communication within the reward circuit, this study investigated how beta activity is modulated by positive and negative monetary incentives during reach planning, and in particular whether it reflects expected value and motivational salience at different latencies. Electroencephalography was recorded while male and female humans performed a reaching task in which reward or punishment delivery depended on movement accuracy. Before a preparatory delay period, participants were informed of the consequences of hitting or missing the target, according to four experimental conditions: Neutral (hit/miss:+0/-0¢), Reward (hit/miss:+5/-0¢), Punish (hit/miss:+0/-5¢) and Mixed (hit/miss:+5/-5¢). Results revealed that beta power over parieto-frontal regions was strongly modulated by incentives during the delay period, with power positively correlating with movement times. Interestingly, beta power was selectively sensitive to potential rewards early in the delay period, after which it came to reflect motivational salience as movement onset neared. These results demonstrate that beta activity reflects expected value and motivational salience on different time scales during reach planning. They also provide support for models that link beta activity with basal ganglia and dopamine for the allocation of neural resources according to behavioral salience.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30737309
pii: JNEUROSCI.1887-18.2019
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1887-18.2019
pmc: PMC6462448
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2903-2914Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 the authors.
Références
Nature. 1999 Jul 15;400(6741):233-8
pubmed: 10421364
Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):163-78
pubmed: 10731767
Neuroimage. 2000 Jul;12(1):20-7
pubmed: 10875899
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Sep;90(3):1766-89
pubmed: 12801905
Science. 2004 Apr 9;304(5668):307-10
pubmed: 15073380
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499
Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1782-7
pubmed: 15205529
Science. 2004 Jul 9;305(5681):258-62
pubmed: 15247483
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):369-80
pubmed: 16356768
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):507-20
pubmed: 17031711
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90
pubmed: 17517438
Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1075-80
pubmed: 17546027
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):359-81
pubmed: 18251019
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jul;196(4):475-81
pubmed: 19526358
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 05;4(8):e6507
pubmed: 19654866
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 9;29(36):11182-91
pubmed: 19741125
Neuron. 2009 Sep 10;63(5):568-83
pubmed: 19755101
Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Oct;28(8):1135-42
pubmed: 20579829
PLoS Biol. 2010 Aug 03;8(8):e1000444
pubmed: 20689802
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Dec;20(6):704-16
pubmed: 20850966
Neuron. 2010 Dec 9;68(5):815-34
pubmed: 21144997
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
Front Neurosci. 2011 May 09;5:61
pubmed: 21720519
J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 7;31(36):12816-22
pubmed: 21900560
Trends Neurosci. 2011 Dec;34(12):611-8
pubmed: 22018805
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):17-29
pubmed: 22561022
Neuron. 2012 May 10;74(3):582-94
pubmed: 22578508
Exp Neurol. 2013 Jul;245:15-26
pubmed: 23022918
Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):262-6
pubmed: 23034651
Science. 2012 Oct 5;338(6103):132-5
pubmed: 23042897
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 16;33(3):863-9
pubmed: 23325225
Science. 1990 Aug 24;249(4971):892-5
pubmed: 2392679
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863
pubmed: 24324449
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 1;34(1):1-9
pubmed: 24381263
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):5000-5
pubmed: 24639493
Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Jun;39(11):1951-9
pubmed: 24890470
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 06;9(10):e108886
pubmed: 25285436
J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 5;34(45):14833-44
pubmed: 25378151
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Sep;97(3):277-84
pubmed: 25455426
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Sep;97(3):221-32
pubmed: 25958789
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Sep;97(3):210-20
pubmed: 25979156
Curr Biol. 2015 Jun 29;25(13):1707-16
pubmed: 26096975
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Aug;144(4):844-63
pubmed: 26097977
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2015 Apr;35(2):81-8
pubmed: 26460470
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 18;35(46):15369-78
pubmed: 26586823
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Mar;17(3):183-95
pubmed: 26865020
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Oct 1;116(4):1831-1839
pubmed: 27466131
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Feb 1;28(2):574-584
pubmed: 27999125
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov 1;118(5):2745-2754
pubmed: 28814633
J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;37(38):9197-9206
pubmed: 28821677
J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 25;37(43):10438-10450
pubmed: 28951452
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Jun 1;119(6):2347-2357
pubmed: 29537911
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Jun;21(6):787-793
pubmed: 29760524
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 1;179:63-78
pubmed: 29894825
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953