Overall survival and updated progression-free survival outcomes in a randomized phase II study of combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
BRCA1 Protein
/ genetics
BRCA2 Protein
/ genetics
Diarrhea
/ chemically induced
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
/ genetics
Fatigue
/ chemically induced
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Germ-Line Mutation
Humans
Hypertension
/ chemically induced
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Phthalazines
/ administration & dosage
Piperazines
/ administration & dosage
Platinum Compounds
/ pharmacology
Progression-Free Survival
Quinazolines
/ administration & dosage
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time Factors
PARP inhibitors
antiangiogenic therapies
combination targeted therapies
ovarian cancer
Journal
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2019
01 04 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
13
2
2019
medline:
21
4
2020
entrez:
13
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an oral anti-angiogenic. In the primary analysis of this phase II study, combination cediranib/olaparib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This updated analysis was conducted to characterize overall survival (OS) and update PFS outcomes. Ninety patients were enrolled to this randomized, open-label, phase II study between October 2011 and June 2013 across nine United States-based academic centers. Data cut-off was 21 December 2016, with a median follow-up of 46 months. Participants had relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer of high-grade serous or endometrioid histology or had a deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). Participants were randomized to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily until disease progression. In this updated analysis, median PFS remained significantly longer with cediranib/olaparib compared with olaparib alone (16.5 versus 8.2 months, hazard ratio 0.50; P = 0.007). Subset analyses within stratum defined by BRCA status demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PFS (23.7 versus 5.7 months, P = 0.002) and OS (37.8 versus 23.0 months, P = 0.047) in gBRCA wild-type/unknown patients, although OS was not statistically different in the overall study population (44.2 versus 33.3 months, hazard ratio 0.64; P = 0.11). PFS and OS appeared similar between the two arms in gBRCAm patients. The most common CTCAE grade 3/4 adverse events with cediranib/olaparib remained fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. Combination cediranib/olaparib significantly extends PFS compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Subset analyses suggest this margin of benefit is driven by PFS prolongation in patients without gBRCAm. OS was also significantly increased by the cediranib/olaparib combination in this subset of patients. Additional studies of this combination are ongoing and should incorporate analyses based upon BRCA status. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT0111648.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an oral anti-angiogenic. In the primary analysis of this phase II study, combination cediranib/olaparib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This updated analysis was conducted to characterize overall survival (OS) and update PFS outcomes.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Ninety patients were enrolled to this randomized, open-label, phase II study between October 2011 and June 2013 across nine United States-based academic centers. Data cut-off was 21 December 2016, with a median follow-up of 46 months. Participants had relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer of high-grade serous or endometrioid histology or had a deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). Participants were randomized to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily until disease progression.
RESULTS
In this updated analysis, median PFS remained significantly longer with cediranib/olaparib compared with olaparib alone (16.5 versus 8.2 months, hazard ratio 0.50; P = 0.007). Subset analyses within stratum defined by BRCA status demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PFS (23.7 versus 5.7 months, P = 0.002) and OS (37.8 versus 23.0 months, P = 0.047) in gBRCA wild-type/unknown patients, although OS was not statistically different in the overall study population (44.2 versus 33.3 months, hazard ratio 0.64; P = 0.11). PFS and OS appeared similar between the two arms in gBRCAm patients. The most common CTCAE grade 3/4 adverse events with cediranib/olaparib remained fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS
Combination cediranib/olaparib significantly extends PFS compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Subset analyses suggest this margin of benefit is driven by PFS prolongation in patients without gBRCAm. OS was also significantly increased by the cediranib/olaparib combination in this subset of patients. Additional studies of this combination are ongoing and should incorporate analyses based upon BRCA status.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT0111648.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30753272
pii: S0923-7534(19)31114-7
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz018
pmc: PMC6503628
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
BRCA1 Protein
0
BRCA1 protein, human
0
BRCA2 Protein
0
BRCA2 protein, human
0
Phthalazines
0
Piperazines
0
Platinum Compounds
0
Quinazolines
0
cediranib
NQU9IPY4K9
olaparib
WOH1JD9AR8
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
551-557Subventions
Organisme : ARRA NIH HHS
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Trends Cancer. 2016 Nov;2(11):646-656
pubmed: 28741503
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Aug;17(4):343-6
pubmed: 8889347
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30
pubmed: 29313949
Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 15;65(24):11597-604
pubmed: 16357170
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1207-14
pubmed: 25218906
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Sep 15;16(18):4553-60
pubmed: 20823145
Lancet. 2016 Mar 12;387(10023):1066-1074
pubmed: 27025186
Front Oncol. 2015 Jun 01;5:123
pubmed: 26082895
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 2;107(5):2201-6
pubmed: 20133863
Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Oct;24(19):8504-18
pubmed: 15367671
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Sep;49(14):2972-8
pubmed: 23810467