How To Identify Familial Premature Myocardial Infarction: Comparing Approaches To Identify Familial Hypercholesterolemia.
Age Factors
Aged
Apolipoprotein B-100
/ genetics
Cholesterol, LDL
/ blood
DNA Mutational Analysis
Denmark
/ epidemiology
Early Diagnosis
Female
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genetic Testing
Humans
Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II
/ blood
Male
Mass Screening
/ methods
Medical History Taking
Middle Aged
Mutation
Myocardial Infarction
/ diagnosis
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pregnancy
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Receptors, LDL
/ genetics
Risk Factors
Sex Factors
Journal
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
ISSN: 1945-7197
Titre abrégé: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375362
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2019
01 07 2019
Historique:
received:
19
10
2018
accepted:
04
02
2019
pubmed:
13
2
2019
medline:
28
5
2020
entrez:
13
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
How best to identify families with premature myocardial infarction is unclear. We compared approaches to identify familial premature myocardial infarction in the general population using different familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) criteria and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol cut-points. Clinical and mutation criteria for FH and LDL cholesterol cut-points were applied for identification of familial premature myocardial infarction in 106,732 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study. FH criteria identified 898 (13%) cases with familial premature myocardial infarction, leaving 5856 (87%) cases undetected. The ORs for familial premature myocardial infarction, compared with the respective remainder groups, were 4.7 (95% CI, 3.7 to 6.0) for clinical FH by Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria, 4.4 (4.0 to 4.7) for Simon Broome criteria, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.7 to 3.6) for Make Early Diagnosis to Prevent Early Death criteria, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.3) for FH mutation, and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.3 to1.6) for LDL cholesterol ≥5 mmol/L (193 mg/dL). For these risk groups, the sensitivity (true positive rate) for identification of familial premature myocardial infarction were 1.3%, 13%, 1.6%, 0.9%, and 7.1%, respectively. Compared with universal screening of a similar fraction of the population, the relative increase in sensitivity for these risk groups was 3.8-fold [fraction of population examined: 0.3%, 3.3-fold (4%), 2.0-fold (0.8%), 2.0-fold (0.4%), and 1.4-fold (5.3%), respectively]. Criteria for FH identify a small fraction of individuals with familial premature myocardial infarction in the general population. Actively identifying families with premature myocardial infarction would be of potential preventive importance, and this study provides data that could be used to choose the best method for such family identification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30753598
pii: 5307688
doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-02261
doi:
Substances chimiques
APOB protein, human
0
Apolipoprotein B-100
0
Cholesterol, LDL
0
LDLR protein, human
0
Receptors, LDL
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2657-2667Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Endocrine Society.