Evolving Trends in Liver Transplant for Metabolic Liver Disease in the United States.
Adult
Age Factors
Child
Child, Preschool
End Stage Liver Disease
/ etiology
Female
Graft Survival
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Liver Transplantation
/ standards
Male
Metabolic Diseases
/ complications
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Registries
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Survivors
/ statistics & numerical data
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
/ epidemiology
Journal
Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
ISSN: 1527-6473
Titre abrégé: Liver Transpl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909185
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
01
08
2018
accepted:
02
02
2019
pubmed:
13
2
2019
medline:
11
8
2020
entrez:
13
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Indications for liver transplantation (LT) in metabolic disease are evolving. We reviewed the US experience with primary LT for metabolic disease in the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (October 1987 to June 2017) to determine the following: temporal changes in indications, longterm outcomes, and factors predicting survival. Patients were grouped by the presence of structural liver disease (SLD) and whether the defect was confined to the liver. There were 5996 patients who underwent LT for metabolic disease, 2354 (39.3%) being children. LT for metabolic disease increased in children but not in adults. Children experienced a 6-fold increase in LT for metabolic disease without SLD. Indications for LT remained stable in adults. Living donor liver transplantation increased between era 1 and era 3 from 5.6% to 7.6% in children and 0% to 4.5% in adults. Patient and graft survival improved with time. The latest 5-year patient survival rates were 94.5% and 81.5% in children and adults, respectively. Outcomes were worse in adults and in those with extrahepatic disease (P < 0.01), whereas SLD did not affect outcomes. Survival improved with younger age at LT until age <2 years. On multivariate analysis, diagnostic category, inpatient status, age at LT, and transplant era significantly predicted outcomes in all ages with male sex predicting survival in childhood only. Children without structural disease were less likely to die awaiting LT and had improved post-LT survival compared with children with chronic liver disease. In conclusion, LT for metabolic disease is increasingly used for phenotypic correction in children; extrahepatic manifestations significantly impact survival at all ages; where indicated, transplantation should not be unnecessarily delayed; and the development of new allocation models may be required.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
911-921Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK109907
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.