Oophorectomy and risk of contralateral breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.


Journal

Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 30 01 2019
accepted: 05 02 2019
pubmed: 14 2 2019
medline: 16 11 2019
entrez: 14 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Following a diagnosis of breast cancer, BRCA mutation carriers face an increased risk of developing a second (contralateral) cancer in the unaffected breast. It is important to identify predictors of contralateral cancer in order to make informed decisions about bilateral mastectomy. The impact of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (i.e., oophorectomy) on the risk of developing contralateral breast cancer is unclear. Thus, we conducted a prospective study of the relationship between oophorectomy and the risk of contralateral breast cancer in 1781 BRCA1 and 503 BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer. Women were followed from the date of diagnosis of their first breast cancer until the date of diagnosis of a contralateral breast cancer, bilateral mastectomy, date of death, or date of last follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of contralateral breast cancer associated with oophorectomy. Oophorectomy was included as a time-dependent covariate. We performed a left-censored analysis for those women who reported a primary breast cancer prior to study entry (i.e., from completion of baseline questionnaire). After an average of 9.8 years of follow-up, there were 179 (7.8%) contralateral breast cancers diagnosed. Oophorectomy was not associated with the risk of developing a second breast cancer (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.68-1.25). The relationship did not vary by BRCA mutation type or by age at diagnosis of the first breast cancer. There was some evidence for a decreased risk of contralateral breast cancer among women with an ER-positive primary breast cancer, but this was based on a small number of events (n = 240). Overall, our findings suggest that oophorectomy has little impact on the risk of contralateral breast cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30756284
doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05162-7
pii: 10.1007/s10549-019-05162-7
doi:

Substances chimiques

BRCA1 Protein 0
BRCA1 protein, human 0
BRCA2 Protein 0
BRCA2 protein, human 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

443-449

Subventions

Organisme : Canadian Cancer Society
ID : 703058

Auteurs

Joanne Kotsopoulos (J)

Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Jan Lubinski (J)

International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.

Henry T Lynch (HT)

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.

Nadine Tung (N)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Susan Armel (S)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Leigha Senter (L)

Division of Human Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Christian F Singer (CF)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Robert Fruscio (R)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Fergus Couch (F)

Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Jeffrey N Weitzel (JN)

Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.

Beth Karlan (B)

Gynecology Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

William D Foulkes (WD)

Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Pal Moller (P)

Inherited Cancer Research Group, Department for Medical Genetics, Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Andrea Eisen (A)

Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Peter Ainsworth (P)

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Susan L Neuhausen (SL)

Division of Biomarkers of Early Detection and Prevention, Department of Population Science, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.

Olufunmilayo Olopade (O)

Department of Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Ping Sun (P)

Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.

Jacek Gronwald (J)

International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.

Steven A Narod (SA)

Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada. steven.narod@wchospital.ca.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. steven.narod@wchospital.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH