Coronary vascular function in patients with resistant hypertension and normal myocardial perfusion: a propensity score analysis.
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Humans
Hypertension
/ physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Propensity Score
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Radiopharmaceuticals
Risk Factors
PET/CT
myocardial blood flow
myocardial perfusion reserve
resistant hypertension
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
ISSN: 2047-2412
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101573788
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2019
01 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
21
11
2018
accepted:
30
01
2019
pubmed:
16
2
2019
medline:
3
11
2020
entrez:
16
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Impaired myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) may occur earlier than coronary atherosclerosis and it may be an early manifestation of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with resistant hypertension (RH). We evaluated the relationship between RH and MPR in patients with systemic arterial hypertension after balancing for coronary risk factors. We studied 360 subjects without overt CAD and normal myocardial perfusion at stress-rest 82Rb positron emission tomography/computed tomography. To account for differences in baseline characteristics between patients with resistant and controlled hypertension, we created a propensity score-matched cohort considering clinical variables and coronary risk factors. Before matching, patients with RH were significantly older, had higher prevalence of male gender and hypercholesterolaemia, and showed significantly lower global hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MPR compared with those with controlled hypertension, while baseline MBF and coronary artery calcium (CAC) content were similar in both groups. After matching, there were no significant differences in clinical variables and coronary risk factors between patients with resistant and controlled hypertension, but patients with RH still had lower hyperaemic MBF and MPR (both P < 0.001). At univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses, age, RH, and CAC resulted significant predictors of lower MPR values (all P < 0.05). After balancing clinical characteristic by propensity score analysis, patients with RH had a blunted hyperaemic MBF and MPR compared with patients with controlled hypertension. The identification of impaired MPR could help to identify early structural alterations of the arterial walls in patients with RH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30768182
pii: 5320318
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jez025
doi:
Substances chimiques
Radiopharmaceuticals
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
949-958Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.