Nitrogen- and phosphorus-starved Triticum aestivum show distinct belowground microbiome profiles.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
12
2018
accepted:
05
02
2019
entrez:
21
2
2019
pubmed:
21
2
2019
medline:
31
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many plants have natural partnerships with microbes that can boost their nitrogen (N) and/or phosphorus (P) acquisition. To assess whether wheat may have undiscovered associations of these types, we tested if N/P-starved Triticum aestivum show microbiome profiles that are simultaneously different from those of N/P-amended plants and those of their own bulk soils. The bacterial and fungal communities of root, rhizosphere, and bulk soil samples from the Historical Dryland Plots (Lethbridge, Canada), which hold T. aestivum that is grown both under N/P fertilization and in conditions of extreme N/P-starvation, were taxonomically described and compared (bacterial 16S rRNA genes and fungal Internal Transcribed Spacers-ITS). As the list may include novel N- and/or P-providing wheat partners, we then identified all the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that were proportionally enriched in one or more of the nutrient starvation- and plant-specific communities. These analyses revealed: a) distinct N-starvation root and rhizosphere bacterial communities that were proportionally enriched, among others, in OTUs belonging to families Enterobacteriaceae, Chitinophagaceae, Comamonadaceae, Caulobacteraceae, Cytophagaceae, Streptomycetaceae, b) distinct N-starvation root fungal communities that were proportionally enriched in OTUs belonging to taxa Lulworthia, Sordariomycetes, Apodus, Conocybe, Ascomycota, Crocicreas, c) a distinct P-starvation rhizosphere bacterial community that was proportionally enriched in an OTU belonging to genus Agrobacterium, and d) a distinct P-starvation root fungal community that was proportionally enriched in OTUs belonging to genera Parastagonospora and Phaeosphaeriopsis. Our study might have exposed wheat-microbe connections that can form the basis of novel complementary yield-boosting tools.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30785878
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210538
pii: PONE-D-18-36321
pmc: PMC6382137
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fertilizers
0
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Phosphorus
27YLU75U4W
Nitrogen
N762921K75
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0210538Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Science. 2015 Feb 13;347(6223):1259855
pubmed: 25592418
Microbes Environ. 2014;29(1):50-9
pubmed: 24463575
Microb Biotechnol. 2016 Sep;9(5):635-40
pubmed: 27418200
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
New Phytol. 2012 Apr;194(2):523-535
pubmed: 22292929
ISME J. 2010 Mar;4(3):315-26
pubmed: 19924157
New Phytol. 2004 Nov;164(2):347-355
pubmed: 33873547
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 29;8:2048
pubmed: 29238358
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2015 Mar;28(3):212-7
pubmed: 25514681
Microb Ecol. 2018 Jan;75(1):183-191
pubmed: 28634640
Mycol Res. 2004 Sep;108(Pt 9):1079-88
pubmed: 15506019
Nature. 2014 Oct 23;514(7523):486-9
pubmed: 25186728
Microbes Environ. 2017 Dec 27;32(4):314-323
pubmed: 29187692
Microbes Environ. 2016;31(1):4-10
pubmed: 26960961
Nat Plants. 2018 May;4(5):247-257
pubmed: 29725101
Front Microbiol. 2018 May 29;9:1074
pubmed: 29896167
Nature. 2017 Mar 23;543(7646):513-518
pubmed: 28297714
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 30;7:41766
pubmed: 28134326
Front Microbiol. 2015 Aug 04;6:771
pubmed: 26300854
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Feb 13;8:132
pubmed: 28243246
Plant Physiol. 2005 Jun;138(2):998-1008
pubmed: 15908608
J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Sep;70(3):565-9
pubmed: 17683816
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Feb;65(Pt 2):578-586
pubmed: 25404481
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018 Aug;44:129-136
pubmed: 29684704
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195345
pubmed: 29621291
Front Microbiol. 2015 Oct 16;6:984
pubmed: 26528243
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
pubmed: 17586664
Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:269-89
pubmed: 26421509
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Feb;111:30-38
pubmed: 27894005
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
pubmed: 20709691
J Integr Plant Biol. 2016 Mar;58(3):203-12
pubmed: 26667884
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Jan;23(1):25-41
pubmed: 29050989
Ann Bot. 2013 May;111(5):769-79
pubmed: 23508650
J Bacteriol. 2011 Mar;193(5):1183-90
pubmed: 21183664
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63
pubmed: 21903629
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2918
pubmed: 24346131
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 6;113(49):E7996-E8005
pubmed: 27864511
Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45:119-44
pubmed: 21838550
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Apr 09;14(4):7681-701
pubmed: 23612324
New Phytol. 2006;172(3):536-43
pubmed: 17083683
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Mar;77(6):1973-80
pubmed: 21239540
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015 Nov;96:199-208
pubmed: 26298806
BMC Microbiol. 2005 May 18;5:28
pubmed: 15904497
Plant Mol Biol. 2016 Apr;90(6):561-74
pubmed: 26821805
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2015 May;28(5):615-25
pubmed: 25608181
ISME J. 2015 May;9(5):1177-94
pubmed: 25350160