Transition to active learning in rural Nepal: an adaptable and scalable curriculum development model.
Curriculum
Education, Medical, Continuing
/ organization & administration
Educational Measurement
Feedback
Health Services Research
Humans
Needs Assessment
Nepal
Problem-Based Learning
/ organization & administration
Program Development
Program Evaluation
Rural Health Services
/ organization & administration
Teaching
/ organization & administration
Active learning
Continuing medical education
Curriculum development
Learners as teachers
Limited resource
Rural
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Feb 2019
20 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
27
09
2018
accepted:
12
02
2019
entrez:
22
2
2019
pubmed:
23
2
2019
medline:
19
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Traditional medical education in much of the world has historically relied on passive learning. Although active learning has been in the medical education literature for decades, its incorporation into practice has been inconsistent. We describe and analyze the implementation of a multidisciplinary continuing medical education curriculum in a rural Nepali district hospital, for which a core objective was an organizational shift towards active learning. The intervention occurred in a district hospital in remote Nepal, staffed primarily by mid-level providers. Before the intervention, education sessions included traditional didactics. We conducted a mixed-methods needs assessment to determine the content and educational strategies for a revised curriculum. Our goal was to develop an effective, relevant, and acceptable curriculum, which could facilitate active learning. As part of the intervention, physicians acted as both learners and teachers by creating and delivering lectures. Presenters used lecture templates to prioritize clarity, relevance, and audience engagement, including discussion questions and clinical cases. Two 6-month curricular cycles were completed during the study period. Daily lecture evaluations assessed ease of understanding, relevance, clinical practice change, and participation. Periodic lecture audits recorded learner talk-time, the proportion of lecture time during which learners were talking, as a surrogate for active learning. Feedback from evaluation and audit results was provided to presenters, and pre- and post-curriculum knowledge assessment exams were conducted. Lecture audits showed a significant increase in learner talk-time, from 14% at baseline to 30% between months 3-6, maintained at 31% through months 6-12. Lecture evaluations demonstrated satisfaction with the curriculum. Pre- and post-curriculum knowledge assessment scores improved from 50 to 64% (difference 13.3% ± 4.5%, p = 0.006). As an outcome for the measure of organizational change, the curriculum was replicated at an additional clinical site. We demonstrate that active learning can be facilitated by implementing a new educational strategy. Lecture audits proved useful for internal program improvement. The components of the intervention which are transferable to other rural settings include the use of learners as teachers, lecture templates, and provision of immediate feedback. This curricular model could be adapted to similar settings in Nepal, and globally.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Traditional medical education in much of the world has historically relied on passive learning. Although active learning has been in the medical education literature for decades, its incorporation into practice has been inconsistent. We describe and analyze the implementation of a multidisciplinary continuing medical education curriculum in a rural Nepali district hospital, for which a core objective was an organizational shift towards active learning.
METHODS
METHODS
The intervention occurred in a district hospital in remote Nepal, staffed primarily by mid-level providers. Before the intervention, education sessions included traditional didactics. We conducted a mixed-methods needs assessment to determine the content and educational strategies for a revised curriculum. Our goal was to develop an effective, relevant, and acceptable curriculum, which could facilitate active learning. As part of the intervention, physicians acted as both learners and teachers by creating and delivering lectures. Presenters used lecture templates to prioritize clarity, relevance, and audience engagement, including discussion questions and clinical cases. Two 6-month curricular cycles were completed during the study period. Daily lecture evaluations assessed ease of understanding, relevance, clinical practice change, and participation. Periodic lecture audits recorded learner talk-time, the proportion of lecture time during which learners were talking, as a surrogate for active learning. Feedback from evaluation and audit results was provided to presenters, and pre- and post-curriculum knowledge assessment exams were conducted.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Lecture audits showed a significant increase in learner talk-time, from 14% at baseline to 30% between months 3-6, maintained at 31% through months 6-12. Lecture evaluations demonstrated satisfaction with the curriculum. Pre- and post-curriculum knowledge assessment scores improved from 50 to 64% (difference 13.3% ± 4.5%, p = 0.006). As an outcome for the measure of organizational change, the curriculum was replicated at an additional clinical site.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We demonstrate that active learning can be facilitated by implementing a new educational strategy. Lecture audits proved useful for internal program improvement. The components of the intervention which are transferable to other rural settings include the use of learners as teachers, lecture templates, and provision of immediate feedback. This curricular model could be adapted to similar settings in Nepal, and globally.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30786884
doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1492-3
pii: 10.1186/s12909-019-1492-3
pmc: PMC6383231
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
61Références
JAMA. 1999 Sep 1;282(9):867-74
pubmed: 10478694
Med Teach. 2001 Mar;23(2):164-170
pubmed: 11371293
Med Teach. 2002 Jan;24(1):32-40
pubmed: 12098455
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9(1):15-27
pubmed: 14739758
Acad Med. 2004 Feb;79(2):186-94
pubmed: 14744724
Lancet. 2004 Jul 3-9;364(9428):29-34
pubmed: 15234853
Acad Med. 2004 Oct;79(10 Suppl):S70-81
pubmed: 15383395
Med Teach. 2006 Sep;28(6):497-526
pubmed: 17074699
Adv Physiol Educ. 2006 Dec;30(4):159-67
pubmed: 17108243
Med Teach. 2007 Feb;29(1):38-42
pubmed: 17538832
Med Educ. 2008 Feb;42(2):128-33
pubmed: 18194162
Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;29(6):636-44
pubmed: 20939639
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 1;108(5):1821-6
pubmed: 21245314
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Dec;20(12):1082-8
pubmed: 21949441
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):97-106
pubmed: 22150201
BMC Med Educ. 2012 May 16;12:31
pubmed: 22591729
Hum Resour Health. 2012 Aug 31;10:27
pubmed: 22938089
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Feb 08;11:5
pubmed: 23394308
Med Teach. 2014 May;36(5):422-9
pubmed: 24491186
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5
pubmed: 24821756
Med Teach. 2016;38(3):255-62
pubmed: 25776229
Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;40(4):667-71
pubmed: 27259491
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 19;16:492
pubmed: 27643684
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 19;16(1):275
pubmed: 27760535
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2017 May 2;4:e8
pubmed: 28596909