Perspectives on End-of-Life Treatment among Patients with COPD: A Multicenter, Cross-sectional Study in Japan.
Advance Care Planning
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Communication
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Japan
Male
Physician-Patient Relations
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
/ psychology
Respiration, Artificial
Surveys and Questionnaires
Terminal Care
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
advanced care planning
end-of-life care
patient–physician communication
shared decision making
Journal
COPD
ISSN: 1541-2563
Titre abrégé: COPD
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101211769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
23
2
2019
medline:
19
3
2020
entrez:
22
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of mortality. Since patients with severe COPD may experience exacerbations and eventually face mortality, advanced care planning (ACP) has been increasingly emphasized in the recent COPD guidelines. We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study to survey the current perspectives of Japanese COPD patients toward ACP. "High-risk" COPD patients and their attending physicians were consecutively recruited. The patients' family configurations, understanding of COPD pathophysiology, current end-of-life care communication with physicians and family members, and preferences for invasive life-sustaining treatments including mechanical ventilation (MV) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were evaluated using a custom-made, structured, self-administered questionnaire. Attending physicians were also interviewed, and we evaluated the patient-physician agreement. Among the 224 eligible "high-risk" patients, 162 participated. Half of the physicians (54.4%) thought they had communicated detailed information; however, only 19.4% of the COPD patients thought the physicians did so (κ score = 0.16). Less than 10% of patients wanted to receive invasive treatment (MV, 6.3% and CPR, 9.4%); interestingly, more than half marked their decision as "refer to the physician" (MV 42.5% and CPR 44.4%) or "refer to family" (MV, 13.8% and CPR, 14.4%). Patients with less knowledge of COPD were less likely to indicate that they had already made a decision. Although ACP is necessary to cope with severe COPD, Japanese "high-risk" COPD patients were unable to make a decision on their preferences for invasive treatments. Lack of disease knowledge and communication gaps between patients and physicians should be addressed as part of these patients' care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30788987
doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.1573888
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM