CreA-independent carbon catabolite repression of cellulase genes by trimeric G-protein and protein kinase A in Aspergillus nidulans.
Aspergillus nidulans
/ genetics
Carbon
/ metabolism
Catabolite Repression
/ genetics
Cellulase
/ genetics
Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases
/ genetics
Cyclic GMP-Dependent Protein Kinases
/ genetics
Fungal Proteins
/ genetics
GTP-Binding Proteins
/ genetics
Gene Deletion
Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal
Glucose
/ metabolism
Repressor Proteins
/ genetics
Aspergillus nidulans
Carbon catabolite repression
Cellulase
GanB
PkaA
Journal
Current genetics
ISSN: 1432-0983
Titre abrégé: Curr Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8004904
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
29
09
2018
accepted:
14
02
2019
revised:
12
02
2019
pubmed:
24
2
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
entrez:
24
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cellulase production in filamentous fungi is repressed by various carbon sources. In our preliminary survey in Aspergillus nidulans, degree of de-repression differed depending on carbon sources in a mutant of creA, encoding the transcriptional repressor for carbon catabolite repression (CCR). To further understand mechanisms of CCR of cellulase production, we compared the effects of creA deletion with deletion of protein kinase A (pkaA) and G (ganB) genes, which constitute a nutrient sensing and signaling pathway. In plate culture with carboxymethyl cellulose and D-glucose, deletion of pkaA and ganB, but not creA, led to significant de-repression of cellulase production. In submerged culture with cellobiose and D-glucose or 2-deoxyglucose, both creA or pkaA single deletion led to partial de-repression of cellulase genes with the highest level by their double deletion, while ganB deletion caused de-repression comparable to that of the creA/pkaA double deletion. With ball-milled cellulose and D-glucose, partial de-repression was detected by deletion of creA but not of pkaA or ganB. The creA/pkaA or creA/ganB double deletion led to earlier expression than the creA deletion. Furthermore, the effect of each deletion with D-xylose or L-arabinose as the repressing carbon source was significantly different from that with D-glucose, D-fructose, and D-mannose. Consequently, this study revealed that PkaA and GanB participate in CreA-independent CCR and that contribution of CreA, PkaA, and GanB in CCR differs depending on the inducers, repressing carbon sources, and culture conditions (plate or submerged). Further study of CreA-independent mechanisms is needed to fully understand CCR in filamentous fungi.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30796472
doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-00944-4
pii: 10.1007/s00294-019-00944-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fungal Proteins
0
Repressor Proteins
0
CreA protein, Aspergillus nidulans
144516-87-0
Carbon
7440-44-0
Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases
EC 2.7.11.11
Cyclic GMP-Dependent Protein Kinases
EC 2.7.11.12
Cellulase
EC 3.2.1.4
GTP-Binding Proteins
EC 3.6.1.-
Glucose
IY9XDZ35W2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
941-952Subventions
Organisme : Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council
ID : 26011A
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 18H02125
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 17H06763
Organisme : Institute for Fermentation, Osaka
ID : L-2018-2-020
Références
Fungal Genet Biol. 1999 Apr;26(3):253-69
pubmed: 10361038
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999 Jun 15;175(2):239-45
pubmed: 10386374
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Oct;65(10):4340-5
pubmed: 10508057
J Bacteriol. 2000 Jan;182(1):233-5
pubmed: 10613888
J Bacteriol. 2001 Mar;183(5):1517-23
pubmed: 11160081
Mol Microbiol. 2002 Mar;43(5):1173-82
pubmed: 11918805
FEBS Lett. 2002 Sep 25;528(1-3):279-82
pubmed: 12297320
Genetics. 2003 May;164(1):95-104
pubmed: 12750323
Nature. 1951 Jul 28;168(4265):167
pubmed: 14875032
J Biol Chem. 1952 Mar;195(1):19-23
pubmed: 14938350
Mol Microbiol. 2004 Aug;53(3):929-40
pubmed: 15255903
Genetics. 2005 Sep;171(1):71-80
pubmed: 15944355
Yeast. 2006 Apr 15;23(5):399-405
pubmed: 16598691
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008 Feb;72(2):312-20
pubmed: 18256482
Fungal Genet Biol. 2008 Jun;45(6):984-93
pubmed: 18420433
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009 Feb;73(2):391-9
pubmed: 19202286
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Nov;85(1):141-54
pubmed: 19777228
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2011;75(5):953-9
pubmed: 21597200
Fungal Genet Biol. 2012 Feb;49(2):130-40
pubmed: 22142781
Microb Cell Fact. 2012 Feb 21;11:26
pubmed: 22353731
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58008
pubmed: 23505451
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Jun 25;6(1):91
pubmed: 23800192
Fungal Genet Biol. 2013 Nov;60:29-45
pubmed: 23892063
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;98(1):335-43
pubmed: 24213479
Fungal Genet Biol. 2015 Sep;82:136-44
pubmed: 26117687
Mol Microbiol. 2015 Oct;98(3):420-39
pubmed: 26179439
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015 Dec 18;8:213
pubmed: 26690721
Curr Genet. 1989 Jun;15(6):457-9
pubmed: 2673558
J Biol Chem. 2016 Apr 1;291(14):7267-85
pubmed: 26865637
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Apr;100(8):3621-35
pubmed: 26946171
Genetics. 2016 May;203(1):335-52
pubmed: 27017621
Curr Genet. 2017 Aug;63(4):647-667
pubmed: 27878624
Curr Genet. 2017 Aug;63(4):669-683
pubmed: 27915380
J Biosci Bioeng. 2018 Feb;125(2):141-147
pubmed: 28970110
Curr Genet. 2018 Dec;64(6):1245-1260
pubmed: 29654355
MBio. 2018 Jun 19;9(3):
pubmed: 29921666
Mol Microbiol. 2018 Oct;110(2):176-190
pubmed: 29995996
Mol Gen Genet. 1973 Nov 12;126(3):201-16
pubmed: 4593756
EMBO J. 1994 Jan 15;13(2):407-15
pubmed: 8313886
FEBS Lett. 1995 Nov 27;376(1-2):103-7
pubmed: 8521952
Can J Microbiol. 1996 Sep;42(9):950-9
pubmed: 8864218
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1997 Jan;50(1):45-52
pubmed: 9066765
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct;64(10):3615-9
pubmed: 9758775