Factors influencing recruitment to a randomised placebo-controlled trial of oral naltrexone and extended release implant naltrexone: Qualitative study.
Adult
Delayed-Action Preparations
Female
Health Personnel
/ psychology
Humans
Injections, Intramuscular
Interviews as Topic
Male
Naltrexone
/ administration & dosage
Narcotic Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Opioid-Related Disorders
/ rehabilitation
Qualitative Research
Research Personnel
/ psychology
Time Factors
Clinical trial
Naltrexone
Opioid dependence
Qualitative
Social marketing
Study recruitment
Journal
Journal of substance abuse treatment
ISSN: 1873-6483
Titre abrégé: J Subst Abuse Treat
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8500909
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
15
10
2018
revised:
15
01
2019
accepted:
15
01
2019
entrez:
25
2
2019
pubmed:
25
2
2019
medline:
26
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To understand the influences on recruitment to the Naltrexone Enhanced Addiction Treatment (NEAT) study, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) implants for opioid use disorder (OUD), to learn lessons for the design and conduct of similar future research. 29 face-to-face, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients recruited to NEAT (n = 6), patients not recruited (n = 11), researchers who designed the trial (n = 5), and staff who delivered the trial (n = 7). The social marketing mix was used as a framework to guide the data analyses. Dimensions of the 7Ps of the social marketing mix - product, price, place, promotion, physical environment, people, and processes all influenced recruitment to the NEAT trial. Among other things, the potential to receive a naltrexone implant (product); the provision of transport passes and shopping vouchers (price); clear verbal explanations (promotion); familiarity of the trial setting (physical environment); and approachable, friendly and informative trial delivery staff (people) positively influenced recruitment. Whereas, wanting a less medical approach to recovery (product); the perceived time, physical, and psychological costs of taking part (price); service ideological opposition to naltrexone in recovery (place); inaccessible written information (promotion); the location and nature of the trial setting (physical environment); a lack of knowledge about implants (people); and the blind allocation and potential of placebo (processes) deterred people from joining the trial. Qualitative research informed by the social marketing mix as an analytical framework yielded detailed insights into understanding the factors and circumstances that influenced recruitment to the NEAT trial. Our findings have implications for the planning and implementation of future addiction trials, especially trials of extended-release formulations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30797394
pii: S0740-5472(18)30502-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.012
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Delayed-Action Preparations
0
Narcotic Antagonists
0
Naltrexone
5S6W795CQM
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
52-60Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.