The prevalence of estrogen receptor-1 mutation in advanced breast cancer: The estrogen receptor one study (EROS1).


Journal

Cancer treatment and research communications
ISSN: 2468-2942
Titre abrégé: Cancer Treat Res Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101694651

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 31 10 2018
accepted: 18 02 2019
pubmed: 4 3 2019
medline: 5 9 2019
entrez: 4 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Breast cancer has, due its high incidence, the highest mortality of cancer in women. The most common molecular variety of breast cancer is luminal subtype that expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), encoded by the estrogen receptor1 (ESR1) gene, is expressed in approximately 70% of all breast cancers, and hormonal therapy represents a major treatment modality in all stages of ER positive breast cancers. Acquired mutations in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of ERα, referred as ESR1 mutation, result in resistance to different endocrine therapies leading to disease progression or recurrence. Recent studies reviled that these ESR1 mutations lead to constitutive activity of the estrogen receptor ER, meaning that the receptor is active in absence of its ligand conferring resistance against endocrine therapy and tumor growth. Published studies have not yet been able to determine the exact prevalence rate of ESR1 mutations, but set the outer boundaries between 11-55%. The goal of the present study is to determine the frequency rate of ESR1 mutations in ER positive recurrent breast cancer by using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) technique. This retrospective study was conducted in the Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp University Hospital. The seven most common ESR1mutations (c.1138G>C (p. (E380Q)), c.1610A>G (p.(Y537C)), c.1613A>G (p.(p.D538G)), c.1607T>G (p.(L536R)), c.1387T>C (p.S463R)), c.16410A>C (p.(Y537S)), c.609T>A (p.(Y537N)) were assessed in available baseline plasma samples of 21 patients with ER positive recurrent breast cancer. Inclusion criteria for study participation were: female, age above 18 years, ER positive breast cancer, 5years adjuvant hormonal therapy of primary disease, and disease recurrence or metastasis during or after stop of endocrine therapy. ESR1 mutations were analyzed in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). cfDNA was obtained from 21 patients with recurrent breast cancer. ESR1 mutations were found in 4/21 (19%; 95% CI, 5%-42%). The test sensitivity was lower than the targeted value <0.1% in 29% of patients (6/21). No significant statistical difference in baseline clinical characteristics was observed in patients with wild-type and mutant ER (p>0.05). Adjuvant endocrine therapy for primary disease was Tamoxifen (TAM) for 57% of patients (12 of 21) of whom 8 patients had received aromatase inhibitor (AI) after two years, while 43% of patients (9 of 21) had received AI as first line adjuvant hormonal therapy. All the patients had received aromatase inhibitor AI therapy in first or second line therapy with initially a variable period of good response. ESR1 mutation analysis could be determined in archived plasma samples using simple non-invasive methods. In the future, screening for mutation status could improve the therapeutic strategies in controlling ER signaling before the occurrence of wide spread disease metastasis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Breast cancer has, due its high incidence, the highest mortality of cancer in women. The most common molecular variety of breast cancer is luminal subtype that expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), encoded by the estrogen receptor1 (ESR1) gene, is expressed in approximately 70% of all breast cancers, and hormonal therapy represents a major treatment modality in all stages of ER positive breast cancers. Acquired mutations in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of ERα, referred as ESR1 mutation, result in resistance to different endocrine therapies leading to disease progression or recurrence. Recent studies reviled that these ESR1 mutations lead to constitutive activity of the estrogen receptor ER, meaning that the receptor is active in absence of its ligand conferring resistance against endocrine therapy and tumor growth. Published studies have not yet been able to determine the exact prevalence rate of ESR1 mutations, but set the outer boundaries between 11-55%.
PURPOSE
The goal of the present study is to determine the frequency rate of ESR1 mutations in ER positive recurrent breast cancer by using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective study was conducted in the Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp University Hospital. The seven most common ESR1mutations (c.1138G>C (p. (E380Q)), c.1610A>G (p.(Y537C)), c.1613A>G (p.(p.D538G)), c.1607T>G (p.(L536R)), c.1387T>C (p.S463R)), c.16410A>C (p.(Y537S)), c.609T>A (p.(Y537N)) were assessed in available baseline plasma samples of 21 patients with ER positive recurrent breast cancer. Inclusion criteria for study participation were: female, age above 18 years, ER positive breast cancer, 5years adjuvant hormonal therapy of primary disease, and disease recurrence or metastasis during or after stop of endocrine therapy. ESR1 mutations were analyzed in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR).
RESULTS
cfDNA was obtained from 21 patients with recurrent breast cancer. ESR1 mutations were found in 4/21 (19%; 95% CI, 5%-42%). The test sensitivity was lower than the targeted value <0.1% in 29% of patients (6/21). No significant statistical difference in baseline clinical characteristics was observed in patients with wild-type and mutant ER (p>0.05). Adjuvant endocrine therapy for primary disease was Tamoxifen (TAM) for 57% of patients (12 of 21) of whom 8 patients had received aromatase inhibitor (AI) after two years, while 43% of patients (9 of 21) had received AI as first line adjuvant hormonal therapy. All the patients had received aromatase inhibitor AI therapy in first or second line therapy with initially a variable period of good response.
CONCLUSION
ESR1 mutation analysis could be determined in archived plasma samples using simple non-invasive methods. In the future, screening for mutation status could improve the therapeutic strategies in controlling ER signaling before the occurrence of wide spread disease metastasis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30826563
pii: S2468-2942(18)30159-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2019.100123
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal 0
Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids 0
ESR1 protein, human 0
Estrogen Receptor alpha 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100123

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Omar Najim (O)

Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp, University Hospital of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10. Antwerp 2650, Belgium. Electronic address: omar.najim@outlook.com.

Manon Huizing (M)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Biobank Department, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Konstantinos Papadimitriou (K)

Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp, University Hospital of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10. Antwerp 2650, Belgium; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Xuan Bich Trinh (XB)

Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp, University Hospital of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10. Antwerp 2650, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Patrick Pauwels (P)

Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Sofie Goethals (S)

Biobank Department, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Karen Zwaenepoel (K)

Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Kevin Peterson (K)

Department of Medicine, General Hospital of Monica, Antwerp, Belgium.

Joost Weyler (J)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Sevilay Altintas (S)

Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp, University Hospital of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10. Antwerp 2650, Belgium; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Peter van Dam (P)

Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp, University Hospital of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10. Antwerp 2650, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Wiebren Tjalma (W)

Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp, University Hospital of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10. Antwerp 2650, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH