Generalizable Inter-Institutional Classification of Abnormal Chest Radiographs Using Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks.
Chest radiographs
Classification
Convolutional neural networks
Deep learning
Generalizability
Journal
Journal of digital imaging
ISSN: 1618-727X
Titre abrégé: J Digit Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9100529
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
7
3
2019
medline:
18
11
2020
entrez:
7
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of efficient convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for abnormality detection in chest radiographs and investigate the generalizability of our models on data from independent sources. We used the National Institutes of Health ChestX-ray14 (NIH-CXR) and the Rhode Island Hospital chest radiograph (RIH-CXR) datasets in this study. Both datasets were split into training, validation, and test sets. The DenseNet and MobileNetV2 CNN architectures were used to train models on each dataset to classify chest radiographs into normal or abnormal categories; models trained on NIH-CXR were designed to also predict the presence of 14 different pathological findings. Models were evaluated on both NIH-CXR and RIH-CXR test sets based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). DenseNet and MobileNetV2 models achieved AUROCs of 0.900 and 0.893 for normal versus abnormal classification on NIH-CXR and AUROCs of 0.960 and 0.951 on RIH-CXR. For the 14 pathological findings in NIH-CXR, MobileNetV2 achieved an AUROC within 0.03 of DenseNet for each finding, with an average difference of 0.01. When externally validated on independently collected data (e.g., RIH-CXR-trained models on NIH-CXR), model AUROCs decreased by 3.6-5.2% relative to their locally trained counterparts. MobileNetV2 achieved comparable performance to DenseNet in our analysis, demonstrating the efficacy of efficient CNNs for chest radiograph abnormality detection. In addition, models were able to generalize to external data albeit with performance decreases that should be taken into consideration when applying models on data from different institutions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30838482
doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00180-9
pii: 10.1007/s10278-019-00180-9
pmc: PMC6737122
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
888-896Références
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2):545-558
pubmed: 22315122
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2402-2410
pubmed: 27898976
Invest Radiol. 2017 May;52(5):281-287
pubmed: 27922974
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118
pubmed: 28117445
Invest Radiol. 2017 Jul;52(7):434-440
pubmed: 28212138
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Aug;30(4):427-441
pubmed: 28275919
Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):574-582
pubmed: 28436741
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Aug;30(4):460-468
pubmed: 28600640
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):313-322
pubmed: 29095675
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Apr;25(2):139-145
pubmed: 29119408
JAMA. 2017 Dec 12;318(22):2199-2210
pubmed: 29234806
JAMA. 2017 Dec 12;318(22):2211-2223
pubmed: 29234807
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 15;8(1):4165
pubmed: 29545529
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2388-2396
pubmed: 30318264
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 6;15(11):e1002683
pubmed: 30399157
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002686
pubmed: 30457988