Evaluating visual analytics for health informatics applications: a systematic review from the American Medical Informatics Association Visual Analytics Working Group Task Force on Evaluation.


Journal

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
ISSN: 1527-974X
Titre abrégé: J Am Med Inform Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9430800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2019
Historique:
received: 10 10 2018
revised: 06 12 2018
accepted: 21 12 2018
entrez: 7 3 2019
pubmed: 7 3 2019
medline: 27 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This article reports results from a systematic literature review related to the evaluation of data visualizations and visual analytics technologies within the health informatics domain. The review aims to (1) characterize the variety of evaluation methods used within the health informatics community and (2) identify best practices. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed searches were conducted in February 2017 using search terms representing key concepts of interest: health care settings, visualization, and evaluation. References were also screened for eligibility. Data were extracted from included studies and analyzed using a PICOS framework: Participants, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes, and Study Design. After screening, 76 publications met the review criteria. Publications varied across all PICOS dimensions. The most common audience was healthcare providers (n = 43), and the most common data gathering methods were direct observation (n = 30) and surveys (n = 27). About half of the publications focused on static, concentrated views of data with visuals (n = 36). Evaluations were heterogeneous regarding setting and measurements used. When evaluating data visualizations and visual analytics technologies, a variety of approaches have been used. Usability measures were used most often in early (prototype) implementations, whereas clinical outcomes were most common in evaluations of operationally-deployed systems. These findings suggest opportunities for both (1) expanding evaluation practices, and (2) innovation with respect to evaluation methods for data visualizations and visual analytics technologies across health settings. Evaluation approaches are varied. New studies should adopt commonly reported metrics, context-appropriate study designs, and phased evaluation strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30840080
pii: 5320044
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy190
pmc: PMC7647177
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

314-323

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 04;3(4):e101
pubmed: 26537656
IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):6-9
pubmed: 16711210
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):90-96
pubmed: 28113160
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Apr 1;25(4):428-434
pubmed: 29106585
JAMA. 1990 Mar 2;263(9):1265, 1269, 1272 passim
pubmed: 2304243
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2009 Nov-Dec;15(6):921-8
pubmed: 19834155
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):260-2
pubmed: 25814539
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):330-9
pubmed: 25336597
Nat Genet. 2001 Dec;29(4):365-71
pubmed: 11726920
IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):16-7
pubmed: 19642611

Auteurs

Danny T Y Wu (DTY)

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Annie T Chen (AT)

Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.

John D Manning (JD)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health's Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

Gal Levy-Fix (G)

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Uba Backonja (U)

Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nursing & Healthcare Leadership, University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, Washington.

David Borland (D)

Renaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Jesus J Caban (JJ)

National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Dawn W Dowding (DW)

Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Harry Hochheiser (H)

Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Vadim Kagan (V)

SentiMetrix, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Swaminathan Kandaswamy (S)

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.

Manish Kumar (M)

MEASURE Evaluation, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Eric Pan (E)

Healthcare Delivery Research and Evaluation, Westat, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

David Gotz (D)

Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Articles similaires

Software Behavior, Animal Animals Internet Computational Biology
1.00
DNA Epigenesis, Genetic Information Storage and Retrieval Templates, Genetic DNA Methylation
Computer Security Algorithms Neural Networks, Computer Information Storage and Retrieval Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Humans Multiple Sclerosis Epilepsy Qualitative Research Depression

Classifications MeSH