Real-world virological efficacy and safety of daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in Japan.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antiviral Agents
/ administration & dosage
Benzazepines
/ administration & dosage
Carbamates
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Genotype
Hepacivirus
/ genetics
Hepatitis C, Chronic
/ drug therapy
Humans
Imidazoles
/ administration & dosage
Indoles
/ administration & dosage
Isoquinolines
/ administration & dosage
Japan
Male
Middle Aged
Pyrrolidines
Retrospective Studies
Sulfonamides
/ administration & dosage
Sustained Virologic Response
Treatment Outcome
Valine
/ analogs & derivatives
Asunaprevir
Beclabuvir
Chronic hepatitis C
Daclatasvir
Real-world effectiveness
Journal
Journal of gastroenterology
ISSN: 1435-5922
Titre abrégé: J Gastroenterol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9430794
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
07
11
2018
accepted:
27
02
2019
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
18
7
2020
entrez:
9
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The virological efficacy and safety of the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen consisting of daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir (DCV/ASV/BCV) for patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 have not been previously evaluated in Japanese real-world settings. In a Japanese nationwide multicenter study, the rate of sustained virologic response (SVR) and safety were analyzed in 91 patients who started the DCV/ASV/BCV regimen between November 2016 and July 2017. SVR rates were compared based on baseline patient characteristics. More than 60% of patients had a history of failure to achieve SVR with interferon (IFN)-free DAA therapy. Overall, 50 of 91 patients (54.9%) achieved SVR. Multivariate analysis identified a history of failure with IFN-free DAA therapy and pretreatment HCV RNA levels as factors significantly associated with treatment failure. Whereas the SVR rate in patients without a history of IFN-free DAA therapy was 91.7% (33 of 36 patients), it was only 30.9% (17 of 55 patients) among patients with a history of IFN-free DAA therapy. The rate of discontinuation due to an adverse event was 4.4%. Many patients treated with the DCV/ASV/BCV regimen have a history of a failure to achieve SVR with previous IFN-free DAA therapy. SVR rate was not as high as that in pre-approval clinical trial of this regimen in IFN-free DAA-naïve patients. In addition, most patients with a history of failure with IFN-free DAA therapy, particularly the DCV/ASV regimen, showed resistance to this regimen.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The virological efficacy and safety of the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen consisting of daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir (DCV/ASV/BCV) for patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 have not been previously evaluated in Japanese real-world settings.
METHODS
METHODS
In a Japanese nationwide multicenter study, the rate of sustained virologic response (SVR) and safety were analyzed in 91 patients who started the DCV/ASV/BCV regimen between November 2016 and July 2017. SVR rates were compared based on baseline patient characteristics.
RESULTS
RESULTS
More than 60% of patients had a history of failure to achieve SVR with interferon (IFN)-free DAA therapy. Overall, 50 of 91 patients (54.9%) achieved SVR. Multivariate analysis identified a history of failure with IFN-free DAA therapy and pretreatment HCV RNA levels as factors significantly associated with treatment failure. Whereas the SVR rate in patients without a history of IFN-free DAA therapy was 91.7% (33 of 36 patients), it was only 30.9% (17 of 55 patients) among patients with a history of IFN-free DAA therapy. The rate of discontinuation due to an adverse event was 4.4%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Many patients treated with the DCV/ASV/BCV regimen have a history of a failure to achieve SVR with previous IFN-free DAA therapy. SVR rate was not as high as that in pre-approval clinical trial of this regimen in IFN-free DAA-naïve patients. In addition, most patients with a history of failure with IFN-free DAA therapy, particularly the DCV/ASV regimen, showed resistance to this regimen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30848363
doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01568-8
pii: 10.1007/s00535-019-01568-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
8-cyclohexyl-N-((dimethylamino)sulfonyl)-1,1a,2,12b-tetrahydro-11-methoxy-1a-((3-methyl-3,8-diazabicyclo(3.2.1)oct-8-yl)carbonyl)cycloprop(d)indolo(2,1-a)(2)benzazepine-5-carboxamide
0
Antiviral Agents
0
Benzazepines
0
Carbamates
0
Imidazoles
0
Indoles
0
Isoquinolines
0
Pyrrolidines
0
Sulfonamides
0
Valine
HG18B9YRS7
daclatasvir
LI2427F9CI
asunaprevir
S9X0KRJ00S
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
742-751Références
Hepatology. 2006 Jun;43(6):1317-25
pubmed: 16729309
Hepatology. 2007 Jul;46(1):32-6
pubmed: 17567829
Gastroenterology. 2014 Feb;146(2):420-9
pubmed: 24184132
Hepatology. 2014 Jun;59(6):2083-91
pubmed: 24604476
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 14;9(11):e112647
pubmed: 25397971
J Hepatol. 2015 May;62(5):1204-6
pubmed: 25559328
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Jun;15(6):645-53
pubmed: 25863559
JAMA. 2015 May 5;313(17):1736-44
pubmed: 25942724
Hepatology. 2015 Oct;62(4):1037-46
pubmed: 26147154
Viruses. 2015 Oct 13;7(10):5328-42
pubmed: 26473914
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;52(1):94-103
pubmed: 27236547
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;52(3):385-395
pubmed: 27502287
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 24;11(10):e0165339
pubmed: 27776192
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;52(4):520-533
pubmed: 27873094
Liver Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1325-1333
pubmed: 28178397
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;32(12):1998-2005
pubmed: 28370350
World J Hepatol. 2017 Sep 8;9(25):1064-1072
pubmed: 28951778
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;53(4):566-575
pubmed: 29052790
J Viral Hepat. 2018 May;25(5):535-542
pubmed: 29274188
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;53(12):1276-1284
pubmed: 29740665
J Gen Virol. 2018 Aug;99(8):1058-1065
pubmed: 29916799
Hepatology. 1994 Jul;20(1 Pt 1):15-20
pubmed: 8020885
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan;35(1):201-7
pubmed: 8968908