Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) affects CT radiomics quantification in primary colorectal cancer.
Colorectal neoplasms
Computer-assisted
Fractals
Image processing
Multidetector computed tomography
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
17
10
2018
accepted:
05
02
2019
revised:
21
01
2019
pubmed:
20
3
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
20
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate whether adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), a hybrid iterative CT image reconstruction algorithm, affects radiomics feature quantification in primary colorectal cancer compared to filtered back projection. Additionally, to establish whether radiomics from single-slice analysis undergo greater change than those from multi-slice analysis. Following review board approval, contrast-enhanced CT studies from 32 prospective primary colorectal cancer patients were reconstructed with 20% ASIR level increments, from 0 to 100%. Radiomics analysis was applied to single-slice and multi-slice regions of interest outlining the tumour: 70 features, including statistical (first-, second- and high-order) and fractal radiomics, were generated per dataset. The effect of ASIR was calculated by means of multilevel linear regression. Twenty-eight CT datasets were suitable for analysis. Incremental ASIR levels determined a significant change (p < 0.001) in most statistical radiomics features, best described by a simple linear relationship. First-order statistical features, including mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, energy and entropy, underwent a relatively small change in both single-slice and multi-slice analysis (median standardised effect size B = 0.08). Second-order statistical features, including grey-level co-occurrence and difference matrices, underwent a greater change in single-slice analysis (median B = 0.36) than in multi-slice analysis (median B = 0.13). Fractal features underwent a significant change only in single-slice analysis (median B = 0.49). Incremental levels of ASIR affect significantly CT radiomics quantification in primary colorectal cancer. Second-order statistical and fractal features derived from single-slice analysis undergo greater change than those from multi-slice analysis. • Incremental levels of ASIR determine a significant change in most statistical (first-, second- and high-order) CT radiomics features measured in primary colorectal cancer, best described by a linear relationship. • First-order statistical features undergo a small change, both from single-slice and multi-slice radiomics analyses. • Most second-order statistical features undergo a greater change in single-slice analysis than in multi-slice analysis. Fractal features are only affected in single-slice analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30887205
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06073-3
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06073-3
pmc: PMC6717179
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5227-5235Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 09/22/49
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May;38(5):981-985
pubmed: 28341714
Radiology. 2015 Aug;276(2):339-57
pubmed: 26203706
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 29;11(12):e0166550
pubmed: 28033372
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct;85(10):1867-1874
pubmed: 27666629
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Sep;193(3):764-71
pubmed: 19696291
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 20;34(18):2157-64
pubmed: 27138577
Radiology. 2017 Mar;282(3):665-675
pubmed: 27700229
Med Phys. 2017 Mar;44(3):1050-1062
pubmed: 28112418
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):2009-18
pubmed: 26494642
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 20;6:33860
pubmed: 27645803
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Mar;114(3):345-50
pubmed: 25746350
Radiology. 2016 Apr;279(1):185-94
pubmed: 26624973
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jul;32(7):1009-1012
pubmed: 28497403
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Apr;19(4):349-362
pubmed: 27538267
Radiology. 2016 Dec;281(3):947-957
pubmed: 27347764
Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77
pubmed: 26579733
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):191-9
pubmed: 20028923
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Apr;12(4):624-632
pubmed: 27923715
Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):177-84
pubmed: 23151829
Radiology. 2014 Jul;272(1):100-12
pubmed: 24654970
Invest Radiol. 2015 Apr;50(4):239-45
pubmed: 25501017
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb;82(2):342-8
pubmed: 23194641
Elife. 2017 Jul 21;6:
pubmed: 28731408
Transl Oncol. 2014 Feb 01;7(1):88-93
pubmed: 24772211
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 24;6:23428
pubmed: 27009765
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):655-60
pubmed: 20729443
Med Phys. 2016 Aug;43(8):4854
pubmed: 27487903
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):8-18
pubmed: 22733888
Sci Rep. 2017 May 8;7(1):1556
pubmed: 28484211
Nat Commun. 2014 Jun 03;5:4006
pubmed: 24892406
Radiology. 2010 Jan;254(1):145-53
pubmed: 20032149
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Jun;63(6):1145-56
pubmed: 26441442
Radiology. 2016 Nov;281(2):382-391
pubmed: 27144536
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):3050-3059
pubmed: 27975146
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 May-Jun;36(3):347-53
pubmed: 22592622
J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Sep;30(5):300-7
pubmed: 26164165
Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):197-206
pubmed: 23169793
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 10;6:34921
pubmed: 27721474