Genome-wide analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymorphisms reveals lineage-specific associations with drug resistance.
Bacterial Proteins
/ genetics
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Evolution, Molecular
Gene Transfer, Horizontal
Genome-Wide Association Study
/ methods
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
/ drug effects
Polymorphism, Genetic
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
Whole Genome Sequencing
Drug resistance
Evolution
Mutations
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Tuberculosis
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Mar 2019
29 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
11
04
2018
accepted:
15
03
2019
entrez:
30
3
2019
pubmed:
30
3
2019
medline:
13
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Continuing evolution of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) complex genomes associated with resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs is threatening tuberculosis disease control efforts. Both multi- and extensively drug resistant Mtb (MDR and XDR, respectively) are increasing in prevalence, but the full set of Mtb genes involved are not known. There is a need for increased sensitivity of genome-wide approaches in order to elucidate the genetic basis of anti-microbial drug resistance and gain a more detailed understanding of Mtb genome evolution in a context of widespread antimicrobial therapy. Population structure within the Mtb complex, due to clonal expansion, lack of lateral gene transfer and low levels of recombination between lineages, may be reducing statistical power to detect drug resistance associated variants. To investigate the effect of lineage-specific effects on the identification of drug resistance associations, we applied genome-wide association study (GWAS) and convergence-based (PhyC) methods to multiple drug resistance phenotypes of a global dataset of Mtb lineages 2 and 4, using both lineage-wise and combined approaches. We identify both well-established drug resistance variants and novel associations; uniquely identifying associations for both lineage-specific and -combined GWAS analyses. We report 17 potential novel associations between antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and Mtb genomic variants. For GWAS, both lineage-specific and -combined analyses are useful, whereas PhyC may perform better in contexts of greater diversity. Unique associations with XDR in lineage-specific analyses provide evidence of diverging evolutionary trajectories between lineages 2 and 4 in response to antimicrobial drug therapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Continuing evolution of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) complex genomes associated with resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs is threatening tuberculosis disease control efforts. Both multi- and extensively drug resistant Mtb (MDR and XDR, respectively) are increasing in prevalence, but the full set of Mtb genes involved are not known. There is a need for increased sensitivity of genome-wide approaches in order to elucidate the genetic basis of anti-microbial drug resistance and gain a more detailed understanding of Mtb genome evolution in a context of widespread antimicrobial therapy. Population structure within the Mtb complex, due to clonal expansion, lack of lateral gene transfer and low levels of recombination between lineages, may be reducing statistical power to detect drug resistance associated variants.
RESULTS
RESULTS
To investigate the effect of lineage-specific effects on the identification of drug resistance associations, we applied genome-wide association study (GWAS) and convergence-based (PhyC) methods to multiple drug resistance phenotypes of a global dataset of Mtb lineages 2 and 4, using both lineage-wise and combined approaches. We identify both well-established drug resistance variants and novel associations; uniquely identifying associations for both lineage-specific and -combined GWAS analyses. We report 17 potential novel associations between antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and Mtb genomic variants.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
For GWAS, both lineage-specific and -combined analyses are useful, whereas PhyC may perform better in contexts of greater diversity. Unique associations with XDR in lineage-specific analyses provide evidence of diverging evolutionary trajectories between lineages 2 and 4 in response to antimicrobial drug therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30922221
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5615-3
pii: 10.1186/s12864-019-5615-3
pmc: PMC6440112
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacterial Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
252Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K000551/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
ID : UID/Multi/04413/2013
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N010469/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M01360X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/J014567/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_15103
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 1;23(1):127-8
pubmed: 17050570
Genetics. 2008 Mar;178(3):1709-23
pubmed: 18385116
PLoS Biol. 2008 Dec 16;6(12):e311
pubmed: 19090620
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Apr;47(4):1119-28
pubmed: 19213699
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
PLoS Pathog. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1001307
pubmed: 21408618
Nat Genet. 2011 May;43(5):491-8
pubmed: 21478889
J Cell Biochem. 2011 Oct;112(10):2721-8
pubmed: 21678480
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21147
pubmed: 21698208
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23870
pubmed: 21931620
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 15;54(2):211-9
pubmed: 22198989
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 19;367(1590):850-9
pubmed: 22312052
J Infect Dis. 2012 Mar 15;205(6):964-74
pubmed: 22315279
Nat Genet. 2012 Jun 17;44(7):821-4
pubmed: 22706312
J Cell Biochem. 2013 Jan;114(1):1-6
pubmed: 22833514
J Infect Dis. 2012 Dec 1;206(11):1724-33
pubmed: 22984115
J Infect Dis. 2012 Dec 1;206(11):1642-4
pubmed: 22984117
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jan;57(1):629-32
pubmed: 23114755
Trends Genet. 2013 Mar;29(3):160-9
pubmed: 23245857
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Aug;68(8):1728-32
pubmed: 23539241
Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1183-9
pubmed: 23995135
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 May;20(5):O278-84
pubmed: 24102832
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 11;8(12):e83012
pubmed: 24349420
Nat Genet. 2014 Mar;46(3):279-86
pubmed: 24464101
Nat Rev Genet. 2014 May;15(5):307-20
pubmed: 24662221
Infect Immun. 2014 Aug;82(8):3446-56
pubmed: 24891105
Bioinformatics. 2014 Oct 15;30(20):2843-51
pubmed: 24974202
Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 01;5:4812
pubmed: 25176035
BMC Genomics. 2014 Nov 18;15:991
pubmed: 25407810
Elife. 2015 Mar 03;4:null
pubmed: 25732036
Bioinformatics. 2015 Aug 1;31(15):2577-9
pubmed: 25819675
Nat Commun. 2015 May 11;6:7119
pubmed: 25960343
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 May 13;16:155
pubmed: 25968323
Genome Med. 2015 May 27;7(1):51
pubmed: 26019726
Protein Cell. 2015 Jul;6(7):504-17
pubmed: 26081470
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2015 Jul;4(7):e42
pubmed: 26251830
Genome Biol. 2015 Nov 19;16:250
pubmed: 26581564
Nat Genet. 2016 Mar;48(3):318-22
pubmed: 26829749
BMC Med. 2016 Mar 23;14:31
pubmed: 27005572
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 May 23;60(6):3864-7
pubmed: 27021327
Nat Genet. 2016 May;48(5):544-51
pubmed: 27064254
Cell Rep. 2016 Aug 30;16(9):2512-24
pubmed: 27545883
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Apr 04;1:16041
pubmed: 27572646
Nat Genet. 2016 Dec;48(12):1535-1543
pubmed: 27798628
J Bacteriol. 2016 Dec 28;199(2):
pubmed: 27799329
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1519-1527
pubmed: 27997216
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):243-253
pubmed: 28099825
PLoS Pathog. 2017 Nov 27;13(11):e1006752
pubmed: 29176894
Nat Genet. 2018 Feb;50(2):307-316
pubmed: 29358649
Lancet. 1993 Mar 13;341(8846):647-50
pubmed: 8095569