Online training on how to diagnose anoperineal lesions of Crohn's disease: Do pictures matter? A nationwide randomized study.
Abscess
/ diagnosis
Anus Diseases
/ diagnosis
Crohn Disease
/ diagnosis
Education, Distance
/ methods
Educational Measurement
/ methods
Electronic Mail
Erythema
/ diagnosis
France
Gastroenterology
/ education
Humans
Medical Illustration
Perineum
Photography
Rectal Fistula
/ diagnosis
Skin Ulcer
/ diagnosis
Crohn's disease
E-learning
Perianal lesions
Journal
Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology
ISSN: 2210-741X
Titre abrégé: Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101553659
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
12
06
2018
accepted:
03
12
2018
pubmed:
3
4
2019
medline:
7
7
2020
entrez:
3
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Any gastroenterologist must be trained to properly diagnose anoperineal lesions in patients with Crohn's disease (APLOC). The aim of this study was to establish whether adding pictures would improve teaching effectiveness of the diagnosis of APLOC to French gastroenterology trainees. Trainees were asked to answer a first web-based survey consisting of evaluating 12 pictures of APLOC with a closed answer questionnaire. They were then randomized in 2 groups. Group A received an online teaching with typical pictures and APLOC definitions and group B definitions only. Trainees were asked again seven days later to answer a second survey with 12 other pictures of APLOC and 14 experts also answered this survey. Diagnostic scores were expressed in %. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the score of survey 2 between the two groups of trainees. Secondary endpoints were to compare results of survey 2 between trainees of both groups and experts, and assess diagnosis of each lesion. Two hundred fourty eight trainees among 465 answered survey 1, and 195 survey 2. The diagnostic score was 71.9% for groups A and B and 74.6% for experts (differences NS). After training diagnosis of ulceration was 72% for group A and 72.9% for group B, fistulae 85.2% versus 85.8%, erythema 44.1% vs. 55.6%, anoperineal scars 67.5% vs. 65.6%, and abscess 100% (differences NS). There was no difference between the two teaching methods. Further research should be performed aiming at improving teaching material and quotation baremes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30935906
pii: S2210-7401(18)30274-2
doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.12.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
483-496Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.