Pirfenidone exerts beneficial effects in patients with IPF undergoing single lung transplantation.
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
/ therapeutic use
Combined Modality Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Germany
/ epidemiology
Graft Rejection
/ epidemiology
Graft Survival
Humans
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
/ drug therapy
Incidence
Lung Transplantation
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Primary Graft Dysfunction
/ epidemiology
Pyridones
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
clinical research/practice
critical care/intensive care management
lung (allograft) function/dysfunction
lung (native) function/dysfunction
lung disease
lung transplantation/pulmonology
organ transplantation in general
Journal
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
ISSN: 1600-6143
Titre abrégé: Am J Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100968638
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
08
01
2019
revised:
17
03
2019
accepted:
24
03
2019
pubmed:
4
4
2019
medline:
1
9
2020
entrez:
4
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pirfenidone demonstrated pleiotropic antiinflammatory effects in various experimental and clinical settings. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of previous treatment with pirfenidone on short-term outcomes after single lung transplantation (SLTx). Therefore, patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who were undergoing SLTx were screened retrospectively for previous use of pirfenidone and compared to respective controls. Baseline parameters and short-term outcomes were recorded and analyzed. In total, 17 patients with pirfenidone were compared with 26 patients without antifibrotic treatment. Baseline characteristics and severity of disease did not differ between groups. Use of pirfenidone did not increase blood loss, wound-healing, or anastomotic complications. Severity of primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours was less (0.3 ± 0.6 vs 1.4 ± 1.3, P = .002), and length of mechanical ventilation (37.5 ± 34.8 vs 118.5 ± 151.0 hours, P = .016) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (6.6 ± 7.1 vs 15.6 ± 20.3, P = .089) were shorter in patients with pirfenidone treatment. An independent beneficial effect of pirfenidone was confirmed by regression analysis while controlling for confounding variables (P = .016). Finally, incidence of acute cellular rejections within the first 30 days after SLTx was lower in patients with previous pirfenidone treatment (0.0% vs 19.2%; P = .040). Our data suggest a beneficial role of previous use of pirfenidone in patients with IPF who were undergoing SLTx.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30942945
doi: 10.1111/ajt.15378
pii: S1600-6135(22)09201-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
0
Pyridones
0
pirfenidone
D7NLD2JX7U
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2358-2365Informations de copyright
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.