Prevalence and prognosis of lead masses in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices without infection.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Asymptomatic Diseases
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
/ adverse effects
Defibrillators, Implantable
/ adverse effects
Device Removal
Echocardiography, Transesophageal
Electric Countershock
/ adverse effects
Female
Heart Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Italy
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Pacemaker, Artificial
/ adverse effects
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis-Related Infections
/ diagnostic imaging
Time Factors
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.)
ISSN: 1558-2035
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101259752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
6
4
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
entrez:
6
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Finding of intracardiac lead masses in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices remains controversial, as such masses have been observed in cases of exclusively local infections whereas they have not been recognized in patients with positive cultures of intravascular lead fragments. In this study, we aim to describe the prevalence of intracardiac lead masses in true asymptomatic patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, to identify their predictive factors and to define their prognostic impact at long-term follow-up. Seventy-eight consecutive patients admitted over a 6-month period for elective generator replacement without clinical evidence of infection were evaluated by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and prospectively followed at in-clinic follow-up visits. Lead masses were found in 10 patients (12.8%). These patients had more frequently right ventricular dysfunction at univariate analysis (OR 2.71, P = 0.010) and after baseline variables adjustment (hazard ratio 6.25, P = 0.012). At 5-year follow-up without any specific therapy, none of the patients suffered from any cardiac device infections, or developed clinical signs of infections. There is an evidence of clinical lead masses in asymptomatic patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. The value of these findings is still debated for aetiological interpretation and for therapeutic strategy, but they are not necessarily associated with an infection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Finding of intracardiac lead masses in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices remains controversial, as such masses have been observed in cases of exclusively local infections whereas they have not been recognized in patients with positive cultures of intravascular lead fragments. In this study, we aim to describe the prevalence of intracardiac lead masses in true asymptomatic patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, to identify their predictive factors and to define their prognostic impact at long-term follow-up.
METHODS
METHODS
Seventy-eight consecutive patients admitted over a 6-month period for elective generator replacement without clinical evidence of infection were evaluated by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and prospectively followed at in-clinic follow-up visits.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Lead masses were found in 10 patients (12.8%). These patients had more frequently right ventricular dysfunction at univariate analysis (OR 2.71, P = 0.010) and after baseline variables adjustment (hazard ratio 6.25, P = 0.012). At 5-year follow-up without any specific therapy, none of the patients suffered from any cardiac device infections, or developed clinical signs of infections.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
There is an evidence of clinical lead masses in asymptomatic patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. The value of these findings is still debated for aetiological interpretation and for therapeutic strategy, but they are not necessarily associated with an infection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30950985
doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000797
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM