AUTS2 isoforms control neuronal differentiation.


Journal

Molecular psychiatry
ISSN: 1476-5578
Titre abrégé: Mol Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607835

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 27 11 2015
accepted: 18 03 2019
revised: 15 03 2019
pubmed: 7 4 2019
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 7 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Mutations in AUTS2 are associated with autism, intellectual disability, and microcephaly. AUTS2 is expressed in the brain and interacts with polycomb proteins, yet it is still unclear how mutations in AUTS2 lead to neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Here we report that when neuronal differentiation is initiated, there is a shift in expression from a long isoform to a short AUTS2 isoform. Yeast two-hybrid screen identified the splicing factor SF3B1 as an interactor of both isoforms, whereas the polycomb group proteins, PCGF3 and PCGF5, were found to interact exclusively with the long AUTS2 isoform. Reporter assays showed that the first exons of the long AUTS2 isoform function as a transcription repressor, but the part that consist of the short isoform acts as a transcriptional activator, both influenced by the cellular context. The expression levels of PCGF3 influenced the ability of the long AUTS2 isoform to activate or repress transcription. Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) with heterozygote mutations in Auts2 had an increase in cell death during in vitro corticogenesis, which was significantly rescued by overexpressing the human AUTS2 transcripts. mESCs with a truncated AUTS2 protein (missing exons 12-20) showed premature neuronal differentiation, whereas cells overexpressing AUTS2, especially the long transcript, showed increase in expression of pluripotency markers and delayed differentiation. Taken together, our data suggest that the precise expression of AUTS2 isoforms is essential for regulating transcription and the timing of neuronal differentiation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30953002
doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0409-1
pii: 10.1038/s41380-019-0409-1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Auts2 protein, mouse 0
Cytoskeletal Proteins 0
Protein Isoforms 0
Transcription Factors 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

666-681

Références

Sanders SJ, Murtha MT, Gupta AR, Murdoch JD, Raubeson MJ, Willsey AJ, et al. De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism. Nature. 2012;485:237–41.
pubmed: 22495306 pmcid: 3667984 doi: 10.1038/nature10945
Hamdan FF, Srour M, Capo-Chichi J-M, Daoud H, Nassif C, Patry L, et al. De novo mutations in moderate or severe intellectual disability. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004772.
pubmed: 25356899 pmcid: 4214635 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004772
Ben-David E, Shifman S. Combined analysis of exome sequencing points toward a major role for transcription regulation during brain development in autism. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18:1054–6.
pubmed: 23147383 doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.148
Pinto D, Delaby E, Merico D, Barbosa M, Merikangas A, Klei L, et al. Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:677–94.
pubmed: 24768552 pmcid: 4067558 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.018
Ronan JL, Wu W, Crabtree GR. From neural development to cognition: unexpected roles for chromatin. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:347–59.
pubmed: 23568486 pmcid: 4010428 doi: 10.1038/nrg3413
Suliman R, Ben-David E, Shifman S. Chromatin regulators, phenotypic robustness, and autism risk. Front Genet. 2014;5:81.
pubmed: 24782891 pmcid: 3989700 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00081
De Rubeis S, He X, Goldberg AP, Poultney CS, Samocha K, Ercument Cicek A, et al. Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature. 2014;515:209–15.
pubmed: 25363760 pmcid: 4402723 doi: 10.1038/nature13772
Ernst C. Proliferation and differentiation deficits are a major convergence point for neurodevelopmental disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39:290–9.
pubmed: 27032601 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.03.001
Casanova EL, Casanova MF. Genetics studies indicate that neural induction and early neuronal maturation are disturbed in autism. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:397.
pubmed: 25477785 pmcid: 4237056
Kaushik G, Zarbalis KS. Prenatal neurogenesis in autism spectrum disorders. Front Chem. 2016;4:12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2016.00012 .
Packer A. Neocortical neurogenesis and the etiology of autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;64:185–95.
pubmed: 26949225 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.002
Fromer M, Pocklington AJ, Kavanagh DH, Williams HJ, Dwyer S, Gormley P, et al. De novo mutations in schizophrenia implicate synaptic networks. Nature. 2014;506:179–84.
pubmed: 24463507 pmcid: 4237002 doi: 10.1038/nature12929
Shohat S, Ben-David E, Shifman S. Varying intolerance of gene pathways to mutational classes explain genetic convergence across neuropsychiatric disorders. Cell Rep. 2017;18:2217–27.
pubmed: 28249166 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.007
Zhu X, Need AC, Petrovski S, Goldstein DB. One gene, many neuropsychiatric disorders: lessons from Mendelian diseases. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:773–81.
pubmed: 24866043 doi: 10.1038/nn.3713
Sultana R, Yu C-E, Yu J, Munson J, Chen D, Hua W, et al. Identification of a novel gene on chromosome 7q11. 2 interrupted by a translocation breakpoint in a pair of autistic twins. Genomics. 2002;80:129–34.
pubmed: 12160723 doi: 10.1006/geno.2002.6810
Kalscheuer VM, FitzPatrick D, Tommerup N, Bugge M, Niebuhr E, Neumann LM, et al. Mutations in autism susceptibility candidate 2 (AUTS2) in patients with mental retardation. Hum Genet. 2007;121:501–9.
pubmed: 17211639 doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0284-0
Huang X-L, Zou YS, Maher TA, Newton S, Milunsky JM. A de novo balanced translocation breakpoint truncating the autism susceptibility candidate 2 (AUTS2) gene in a patient with autism. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2010;152:2112–4.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33497
Ben-David E, Granot-Hershkovitz E, Monderer-Rothkoff G, Lerer E, Levi S, Yaari M, et al. Identification of a functional rare variant in autism using genome-wide screen for monoallelic expression. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:3632–41.
pubmed: 21680558 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr283
Elia J, Gai X, Xie HM, Perin JC, Geiger E, Glessner JT, et al. Rare structural variants found in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder are preferentially associated with neurodevelopmental genes. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;15:637–46.
pubmed: 19546859 pmcid: 2877197 doi: 10.1038/mp.2009.57
Mefford HC, Muhle H, Ostertag P, von Spiczak S, Buysse K, Baker C, et al. Genome-wide copy number variation in epilepsy: novel susceptibility loci in idiopathic generalized and focal epilepsies. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000962.
pubmed: 20502679 pmcid: 2873910 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000962
Amarillo IE, Li WL, Li X, Vilain E, Kantarci S. De novo single exon deletion of AUTS2 in a patient with speech and language disorder: a review of disrupted AUTS2 and further evidence for its role in neurodevelopmental disorders. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:958–65.
pubmed: 24459036 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36393
Beunders G, Voorhoeve E, Golzio C, Pardo LM, Rosenfeld Ja, Talkowski ME, et al. Exonic deletions in AUTS2 cause a syndromic form of intellectual disability and suggest a critical role for the C terminus. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;92:210–20.
pubmed: 23332918 pmcid: 3567268 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.12.011
Bedogni F, Hodge RD, Nelson BR, Frederick EA, Shiba N, Daza RA, et al. Autism susceptibility candidate 2(Auts2) encodes a nuclear protein expressed in developing brain regions implicated in autism neuropathology. Gene Expr Patterns. 2010;10:9–15.
pubmed: 19948250 doi: 10.1016/j.gep.2009.11.005
Oksenberg N, Stevison L, Wall JD, Ahituv N. Function and regulation of AUTS2, a gene implicated in autism and human evolution. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003221.
pubmed: 23349641 pmcid: 3547868 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003221
Hori K, Nagai T, Shan W, Sakamoto A, Taya S, Hashimoto R, et al. Cytoskeletal regulation by AUTS2 in neuronal migration and neuritogenesis. Cell Rep. 2014;9:2166–79.
pubmed: 25533347 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.045
Gao Z, Lee P, Stafford JM, von Schimmelmann M, Schaefer A, Reinberg D. An AUTS2–Polycomb complex activates gene expression in the CNS. Nature. 2014;516:349–54.
pubmed: 25519132 pmcid: 4323097 doi: 10.1038/nature13921
Gao Z, Zhang J, Bonasio R, Strino F, Sawai A, Parisi F, et al. PCGF homologs, CBX proteins, and RYBP define functionally distinct PRC1 family complexes. Mol Cell. 2012;45:344–56.
pubmed: 22325352 pmcid: 3293217 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.002
Oksenberg N, Haliburton GDE, Eckalbar WL, Oren I, Nishizaki S, Murphy K, et al. Genome-wide distribution of Auts2 binding localizes with active neurodevelopmental genes. Transl Psychiatry. 2014;4:e431.
pubmed: 25180570 pmcid: 4199417 doi: 10.1038/tp.2014.78
Gaspard N, Bouschet T, Herpoel A, Naeije G, van den Ameele J, Vanderhaeghen P. Generation of cortical neurons from mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1454–63.
pubmed: 19798080 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.157
Gaspard N, Bouschet T, Hourez R, Dimidschstein J, Naeije G, van den Ameele J, et al. An intrinsic mechanism of corticogenesis from embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2008;455:351–7.
pubmed: 18716623 doi: 10.1038/nature07287
Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:2281–308.
pubmed: 24157548 pmcid: 3969860 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143
Ernst J, Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods. 2012;9:215–6.
pubmed: 22373907 pmcid: 3577932 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1906
Ge H, Liu Z, Church GM, Vidal M. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet. 2001;29:482–6.
pubmed: 11694880 doi: 10.1038/ng776
Jansen R, Greenbaum D, Gerstein M. Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 2002;12:37–46.
pubmed: 11779829 pmcid: 155252 doi: 10.1101/gr.205602
Deane CM, Salwiński Ł, Xenarios I, Eisenberg D. Protein interactions: two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1:349–56.
pubmed: 12118076 doi: 10.1074/mcp.M100037-MCP200
Jansen R, Yu H, Greenbaum D, Kluger Y, Krogan NJ, Chung S, et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science. 2003;302:449–53.
pubmed: 14564010 doi: 10.1126/science.1087361
Chen J, Xu H, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. Improved human disease candidate gene prioritization using mouse phenotype. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:392.
pubmed: 17939863 pmcid: 2194797 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-392
Isono K, Mizutani-Koseki Y, Komori T, Schmidt-Zachmann MS, Koseki H. Mammalian polycomb-mediated repression of Hox genes requires the essential spliceosomal protein Sf3b1. Genes Dev. 2005;19:536–41.
pubmed: 15741318 pmcid: 551574 doi: 10.1101/gad.1284605
Kfir N, Lev-Maor G, Glaich O, Alajem A, Datta A, Sze SK, et al. SF3B1 association with chromatin determines splicing outcomes. Cell Rep. 2015;11:618–29.
pubmed: 25892229 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.048
Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, Cuff J, et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2006;125:315–26.
pubmed: 16630819 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041
Harikumar A, Meshorer E Chromatin remodeling and bivalent histone modifications in embryonic stem cells. EMBO Rep. 2015;16:1609–19.
Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, Lieberman E, Giannoukos G, et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature. 2007;448:553–60.
pubmed: 17603471 pmcid: 2921165 doi: 10.1038/nature06008
Endoh M, Endo TA, Endoh T, Isono K, Sharif J, Ohara O, et al. Histone H2A mono-ubiquitination is a crucial step to mediate PRC1-dependent repression of developmental genes to maintain ES cell identity. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002774.
pubmed: 22844243 pmcid: 3405999 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002774
Ku M, Koche RP, Rheinbay E, Mendenhall EM, Endoh M, Mikkelsen TS, et al. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000242.
pubmed: 18974828 pmcid: 2567431 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000242
McEvilly RJ, de Diaz MO, Schonemann MD, Hooshmand F, Rosenfeld MG. Transcriptional regulation of cortical neuron migration by POU domain factors. Science. 2002;295:1528–32.
pubmed: 11859196 doi: 10.1126/science.1067132
Brennaman LH, Zhang X, Guan H, Triplett JW, Brown A, Demyanenko GP, et al. Polysialylated NCAM and ephrinA/EphA regulate synaptic development of GABAergic interneurons in prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23:162–77.
pubmed: 22275477 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr392
Nishikimi M, Oishi K, Tabata H, Torii K, Nakajima K. Segregation and pathfinding of callosal axons through EphA3 signaling. J Neurosci. 2011;31:16251–60.
pubmed: 22072676 pmcid: 6633229 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3303-11.2011
Sado T, Nakajima N, Tada M, Takagi N. A novel mesoderm-specific cDNA isolated from a mouse embryonal carcinoma cell line (embryonal carcinoma cell/cDNA/in situ hybridization/mesoderm/mouse embryo). Dev Growth Differ. 1993;35:551–60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.1993.00551.x
Martin BL, Kimelman D. Brachyury establishes the embryonic mesodermal progenitor niche. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2778–83.
pubmed: 21159819 pmcid: 3003196 doi: 10.1101/gad.1962910
Bedogni F, Hodge RD, Elsen GE, Nelson BR, Daza RAM, Beyer RP, et al. Tbr1 regulates regional and laminar identity of postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:13129–34.
pubmed: 20615956 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002285107 pmcid: 2919950
Edupuganti RR, Harikumar A, Aaronson Y, Biran A, Sailaja BS, Nissim-Rafinia M, et al. Alternative SET/TAFI promoters regulate embryonic stem cell differentiation. Stem Cell Reports. 2017;9:1291–303.
pubmed: 28966118 pmcid: 5639460 doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.021
Oksenberg N, Ahituv N. The role of AUTS2 in neurodevelopment and human evolution. Trends Genet. 2013;29:600–8.
pubmed: 24008202 doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.08.001
Vierbuchen T, Ostermeier A, Pang ZP, Kokubu Y, Südhof TC, Wernig M. Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature. 2010;463:1035–41.
pubmed: 20107439 pmcid: 2829121 doi: 10.1038/nature08797

Auteurs

Galya Monderer-Rothkoff (G)

Department of Genetics, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Nitzan Tal (N)

Department of Genetics, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Marina Risman (M)

Department of Genetics, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Odem Shani (O)

Department of Genetics, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Malka Nissim-Rafinia (M)

Department of Genetics, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Laura Malki-Feldman (L)

Department of Genetics, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Vera Medvedeva (V)

Inserm, UMR-S839, Sorbonne Universités, Pierre et Marie Curie Université Paris 06, Institut du Fer à Moulin, Paris, 75005, France.

Matthias Groszer (M)

Inserm, UMR-S839, Sorbonne Universités, Pierre et Marie Curie Université Paris 06, Institut du Fer à Moulin, Paris, 75005, France.

Eran Meshorer (E)

Department of Genetics, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Sagiv Shifman (S)

Department of Genetics, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. sagiv.shifman@mail.huji.ac.il.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH