Rapid reshaping: the evolution of morphological changes in an introduced beach daisy.
common-garden experiment
evolution of increased competitive ability
neoteny
paedomorphosis
plant traits
rapid evolution
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 02 2019
27 02 2019
Historique:
entrez:
10
4
2019
pubmed:
10
4
2019
medline:
20
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Thousands of species have been introduced to new ranges worldwide. These introductions provide opportunities for researchers to study evolutionary changes in form and function in response to new environmental conditions. However, almost all previous studies of morphological change in introduced species have compared introduced populations to populations from across the species' native range, so variation within native ranges probably confounds estimates of evolutionary change. In this study, we used microsatellites to locate the source population for the beach daisy Arctotheca populifolia that had been introduced to eastern Australia. We then compared four introduced populations from Australia with their original South African source population in a common-environment experiment. Despite being separated for less than 100 years, source and introduced populations of A. populifolia display substantial heritable morphological differences. Contrary to the evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesis, introduced plants were shorter than source plants, and introduced and source plants did not differ in total biomass. Contrary to predictions based on higher rainfall in the introduced range, introduced plants had smaller, thicker leaves than source plants. Finally, while source plants develop lobed adult leaves, introduced plants retain their spathulate juvenile leaf shape into adulthood. These changes indicate that rapid evolution in introduced species happens, but not always in the direction predicted by theory.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30963824
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1713
pmc: PMC6408894
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4392740']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20181713Références
Ecol Lett. 2008 Jul;11(7):701-9
pubmed: 18410377
Oecologia. 2005 Jun;144(1):1-11
pubmed: 15891837
Oecologia. 1993 Jun;94(3):415-427
pubmed: 28313680
New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(1):30-50
pubmed: 22085245
Funct Plant Biol. 2011 Jul;38(7):535-552
pubmed: 32480907
Nature. 2006 Feb 16;439(7078):803
pubmed: 16482148
Oecologia. 1991 Dec;88(4):486-493
pubmed: 28312617
Ann Bot. 2011 Nov;108(7):1337-45
pubmed: 21948627
Evol Appl. 2009 May;2(2):187-99
pubmed: 25567860
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Sep;22(9):481-8
pubmed: 17346848
Science. 2002 Jun 7;296(5574):1858-60
pubmed: 12052958
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
pubmed: 15103368
Oecologia. 1997 Mar;110(1):99-108
pubmed: 28307474
Ecol Lett. 2011 Jul;14(7):702-8
pubmed: 21592274
Ecol Evol. 2013 Mar;3(3):739-51
pubmed: 23531703
Evolution. 2009 Feb;63(2):498-513
pubmed: 19154361
Ecol Evol. 2013 Nov;3(13):4501-17
pubmed: 24340190
Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):942-7
pubmed: 16823378
Physiol Plant. 2008 Nov;134(3):464-72
pubmed: 18636986
Nature. 2015 Sep 3;525(7567):100-3
pubmed: 26287466