To freeze or not to freeze: A culture-sensitive motion capture approach to detecting deceit.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
26
07
2018
accepted:
25
03
2019
entrez:
13
4
2019
pubmed:
13
4
2019
medline:
21
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We present a new signal for detecting deception: full body motion. Previous work on detecting deception from body movement has relied either on human judges or on specific gestures (such as fidgeting or gaze aversion) that are coded by humans. While this research has helped to build the foundation of the field, results are often characterized by inconsistent and contradictory findings, with small-stakes lies under lab conditions detected at rates little better than guessing. We examine whether a full body motion capture suit, which records the position, velocity, and orientation of 23 points in the subject's body, could yield a better signal of deception. Interviewees of South Asian (n = 60) or White British culture (n = 30) were required to either tell the truth or lie about two experienced tasks while being interviewed by somebody from their own (n = 60) or different culture (n = 30). We discovered that full body motion-the sum of joint displacements-was indicative of lying 74.4% of the time. Further analyses indicated that including individual limb data in our full body motion measurements can increase its discriminatory power to 82.2%. Furthermore, movement was guilt- and penitential-related, and occurred independently of anxiety, cognitive load, and cultural background. It appears that full body motion can be an objective nonverbal indicator of deceit, showing that lying does not cause people to freeze.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30978207
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215000
pii: PONE-D-18-22124
pmc: PMC6461255
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0215000Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 27;4:140
pubmed: 23543852
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 20;9:1672
pubmed: 30294288
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Jun;32(3):253-65
pubmed: 17694424
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2010 Dec;11(3):89-121
pubmed: 26168416
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jun 7;4(6):170128
pubmed: 28680668
Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;129(1):74-118
pubmed: 12555795
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 May 5;24(5):730-744
pubmed: 31983985
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):625-33
pubmed: 24142835
Curr Biol. 2014 Mar 31;24(7):738-43
pubmed: 24656830
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Jul;117:75-82
pubmed: 28454989
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(3):214-34
pubmed: 16859438
Am Psychol. 1997 Jun;52(6):613-29
pubmed: 9174398
Law Hum Behav. 2005 Dec;29(6):683-704
pubmed: 16382356